EDOUARD GLISSANT
Poetics of Relation
TOTP AT,
translated by Betsy Wing
Ann Arbor
‘Tue Untversrry oF Micitca ParssContents
“Translator’s Introduction, Baty Wing
Glowary
Imaginary
APPROACHES
‘The Open Boat
Poetics”
AA Rooted Errantry
ELEMENTS
Repestions
Expanse and Filation
Closed Place, Open Word
Concerning « Baroque Abroad in the World
Concerning the Poems Information
PATHS
Dictate, Decree
‘Transparency and Opacity
The Black Beach
3
7
45
“7
6
al
uu
BITHEORIES
Redation
“The Relative and Choe
Distancing, Determining
That That
Relinked, (Relayed), Retated
POETICS
Generatzation
“That Those Beings Be Not Being
For Opacity
Open Circle, Lived Relation
The Burning Beach
Notes
References
13
135
m1
159
ass
21
235
Translator’s Introduction
Basy Wing
“Je ise rcher mon langage
{iy language wh rocks)
Ginn, Lentini
The stumbling blocks of a translation frequently exist a its
‘most productive points. Their usual fist effect is frustration
‘used by obstinate resistance (on both sides), but, i helt
ererrenewed demand for conjecture, these apparent abst
les can allow ust exape the cramped, habicial posites of
‘our own thought, This i the hopedfor reward of transla
tore—nhote first work isto be attentive, even hopeful read
ers—then, with as many premonitions of disaster as prospects
of opening posibiliies within their own languages, they
‘must confront the tack of making these new apenings si:
Able to new readers
‘All of Edouard Glisant’s work, a a poet, novelist, pla
wright, or deoredcian from the very beginning (Las Fader
in Slade a conse (1956], La Lizard (1959]) has been
concerned with exploring the posibiliies ofa language that,
‘would be fully Antllean. Such a language would be capable
‘of writing the Anuiles into history. generating a conception
‘of time finding pat and founding a future. It would escape
the pastity astociated with an impoted language of fixed
forms (French) ae elle the folklore rape ofa language thatum
PATHS
Out oud, to mark he spitAL
GREOLIZATIONS
FO LEN,
Cralisaton, eof the wey forming a complex isan
rol ery linguistic eli only xr ys
process ond cotinty ot by the contents” on which dase
erate Ths share we part fo the cca of elo
Though this ton covers (no more and noes) tha which
sccounts for crlizations, ges on propa to ft
tntenions. The fit ons ont broader ekocuural
‘eam, from the Antilles tthe naan Ocean. But variations
1 hs sot dno em be termining factors, because the
Sper hich hy change in Raion is 0 great. The
booed i ap to gota Beng Bul that would con-
Site stp backs ncomperion with how zations
‘0% function, Wx propre neler human's Being nor its
Io, ae nat prope soy bythe defining of er
denies buy thr lation to eveything pnb a wel—
‘he mutual tations parted by this ineplyof ations.
Crefcatons bring nte Ration but nt twee the
priciptsofeaenese rg ward nagituds, des of
che, of Latinnes ol goealsingconyps—mere oF
ea tenoeenlyDictate, Decree
Baroque derangement and the guarantee provided by sei
etic rigor just yesterday these were the counterpoises of
four movement (out Balan, otr singe, our momentum)
tovard tlaiiemoide!
But the baroque no longer constitutes a derangement,
since it has turned into a “natural” expression of whatever
featters and comes together. The age of clasicisms (0 deep
ning an inteenal unity ated to the dimensions of univer-
‘al vel portslated) 36 past. no doubt, for all cultures Ie
emains to make the newworkof their converyences Work, OF
to untangle ic Itremains to study those culeures that have not
had time, before coming into planetary contact (or eontlict),
to realize “thelr oven” clascism, Are their powers not
impede as they come to the meeting? Then again, what
Stall we say about composite cultures, whose compesition
didnot reslt fom a union of "none" but, rather, was built
inthe margins wih all kinds of materials cha by heir very
nature were exceptions (0 the patience of the rue, o be
thnist headlong into the world by necessity, oppression,
anguish, greed, orn appelte for advencure?
"The baroque isthe favored speech of these euluures, even
ithtenceforth it belongs to all. We ealliebaroque, becase we
know that conflucnces always partake of marginal, hat
classics partake of intolerance and that, for ws, the subst
tute for the hidden violence of dese incolerant exclusions
the manifest and integrating violence of contamination
onNote that metsage exists in places where categories make
Ing their essences distinct were formerly in opposition. The
more miisgebecame realized, the more the idea oft fed
‘As the baroque became naturalized inthe world, it tended vo
become a commonplace, a generality (which is hot the same
asa generalization), of new regime, Because it proliferated
rather than deepened a norm tis unable to consent to “clay
sicisms.” There it no culture rightfully impeded in the
baroque; none imposes its tradition, even if there are some
that export thei generaliving products everywhere
Hows can continuity (which is "desrable”) be practiced in
‘thisincessant turnover? How can the stabilizing action af for
‘mee clasiclss be replaced? And with what?
Acfrst our only recourse in the matter seemed be the pos:
ltivity of scientific method. This, for example, war the
method adopted for the defense and. promotion of lan
guages, corresponding to the ambition of linguists to set
‘self up ara sience. A profitable pretense; despite its failure
tobe confirmed, it provided the basis for a sytem and gat
ered together its catered materials. But scence had ceased
having any desire to obtain this sort of guarantee, having,
meanwhile, ventused not outside the postive but beyond
Posivism. Ic had come face w face with the baroque and
"understood tha the work ofthe latter deserved cogniance
The most cecent developments of science insite is, there=
fore, to ventre in our quest beyond the las aid down by its
Philosophies. For a long ime we have dvined both order
And disorder in the world and projected these ax measure
land excess But every poetics led sto belive something
that, ofcourse, is not wrong: that excestveness of order and
a measured disorder exist as well The only discernible sabi
iis in Relation have todo withthe interdependence of the
cycles operative there, how their corresponding patterns of
‘movement are in tune. In Relaion analyie though sled.
construct unities whose imwerdependent variances jointly
%
i
picce gether the interactive rotaity. These unites are not
‘models but revealing whos monde, Thought makes music
‘Wiliata Faulkner's work, Bob Mareys song, the theories of|
Benoit Mandelbrot, are all ébasmonde.Wilredo Laun’sp
ing (lowing together) or that of Roberto Maca (tearing
apart); the architecture of Chicago and just as eaiy the
shantytowne of Rio or Caracas; Ezra Pounds Cants but also
the marching of schoolehildren in Soweto ate éehormonde
‘Finnegan's Wake was a dhe that was prophetic and
consequently absolute (wichout admision into the real)
‘Antonin Artaud’s words constitute an homonde outside of
the world
Whatever, coming from a tradition, enters ito Relation;
whatever, defending a tradition, juries Relation; whatever,
having lefe behind or refuted exery wadition, provides the
bss for another fllsense to Relation; whatever, born of
Relation, contradicts and embodies i. Anglo-American pid
‘gin (something, therefore, spoken nether by de English nor
by the Americans) i a negative dckomonds, whose concrete
force weaves the folds of Relation and neutralizes its subsi=
“The Creole language i fragile and revealing échemonde,
born of a reality of relation and linited within thie reality by
its dependence
Spoken languages, without exception, have become dor
monde, whose tack we are only just beginning to feel each
{ime one is wiped out by this circularity evotion
Echormonde are not exacerbations that result directly fom
the convulsive conditions of Relation. They ae at workin the
matter ofthe world; dey prophesy or uminae it, divert it
‘or conversely gain strength within i
In order to cope with or express confluences, every ind
vidual, every community, forme is own ‘harmonds, imagined
from power or vainglory, from suffering or impatience. Fach
individual makes this sor of music nd each community 35
93ell. As does he totality composed of individuals and com
Behosmonde thus allow ws to sense and cite the cultures of
peoples in the turbulent confluence whose globalty orga
izes our chaasamnde. They patter its constituent (not com
lusive) elements and its expressions,
What we earlier remarked in SasntJobn Perse as an ses-
thetics of the universe "narration af the universe), we now
describe ina different manner. lis anaesthetic ofthe chase
The chaosmondeis only disorder ifone assumes there to be
an order whose full force poetics is not prepared to reveal
(poetics is nota science). The ambition of poetics, rather, x
to safeguard the energy of this order. The aesthetics of the
universe assumed preesablshed norms the aesthetics of
chaoemonde's the impassioned illurtration and refutation of
these, Chaos isnot devoid of norms, but these neither cot
sutute a goal nor govern a method there
(Chace monde x nether fasion nor confusion: it acknowl
fedges neither the uniform blend-—a ravenous integration —
hor muddled nothingness. Chao ie not chaotie.”
‘But its hidden order does not presuppose hierarchies
precellencies—neither of chosen languages nor of prince
nations, The chaasmindeis nota mechanism thas no key,
‘The aesthetic of the chant monde (what we were thus calling
the aesthetics ofthe universe but cleared of prior! valves)
embraces all the elements and forms of expression of this
totaly within us its tori’ act and it uit, totals’
reflection and agent in motion
The baroque is the notestablished outcome of this
Relaion is that which simultaneously realizes and
‘expres this motion eis the chaoe monde elating (oie).
The poescs of Relation (which is, therefore, part of the
esthetics ofthe chane mond) senses, assumes opens gathers,
*
scatters, continucs, and transforms the thought oF these ele
rents, these forms, and ths mation
Destnitare these facts, declare them void replace them,
reinvent dheir nisi: totaly’ imagination i inexhawsable
and always, in every form, wholly Legitimate—thats, tree of
aM legitimacy.
‘An equilibrium and ability to endure are resved through
‘chosmonde Individuals and communities go beyond sain
fry or suffering, power oF impatience, together—however
Iinperceptiby, The important thing is that ch a proces
represents an optimum Ii results are unpredictable, but the
beginnings ofthe capacity to endure are detecuble, coming.
where formerly there were