Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
By Kendra AsherOverview
This is an opportunity for you to develop, teach, and assess a lesson that highlights discussion
of literature or poetry, where you will work on facilitating interactive dialogue. This dialogue will
be focused on helping children understand, interpret and appreciate a selection of children's
literature or poetry. During the discussion, you will provide support that helps children be
actively involved in asking questions, listening to and interacting with one another, and making
interpretations. This project is also an occasion to reflect on your use of questioning to support
response to literature and higher level thinking. You will analyze how the discourse fostered
during the lesson helps you and the students work toward the goals of the lesson
remain projected as a
reminder. He tends to
talk when not
appropriate when he
should be listening. I
will give examples of
when and how to use
these linking
statements for a
common known story.
Name: __________________________________________
Theme
Beginning
Middle
End
Name: __________________________________________
Please circle the
smiley face based
on how well you
did for questions
1-3
1. I used the Linking
Statement I agree
with________
I did ok
I can do better
5. Did you
share this out
loud?
Yes or No
Name: __________________________________________
6. I disagreed with
___________ and said:
7. Did you
share this out
loud?
Yes or No
Student will link their comments to remarks of others after the teacher reads a fiction
story by using linking statements.
I deleted the word being
b. For each objective listed on the plan, find and label each part listed below
Each objective states:
Performance (what a learner is expected to do to demonstrate learning)
Conditions (the conditions under which a student is able to perform the taskwhen/where the
student displays the performance)
Criterion (how well the student must perform the task in order for the performance to be
acceptable)
If any parts are unclear, incomplete, or missing, offer suggestions for improvement
yes
no
suggestions
Its about making friends but how will you motivate them to
stay interested in the lesson?
b. DURING READING: Model how to engage with the text (e.g., use of reading strategies and analytic
thinking process, inserting vocabulary support, comments and questions to support and extend
comprehension and interpretation)
Are all parts of the
plan complete?
How will you read the text?
List examples of what you will
say to model how to engage
in higher level thinking about
text: analytic thinking and
interpretation; particular
reading strategies (e.g.,
visualizations, inferences,
verifying predictions); provide
vocabulary support or
additional background
knowledge (if needed).
List details you will point out
during reading and/or
questions you will ask.
yes
no
suggestions
Great question!
yes
no
suggestions
d. POST-ASSESSMENT: gather evidence to evaluate the extent to which your students met the stated
objectives for the lesson
Are all parts of the
plan complete?
How will you know the
students are progressing
toward your identified
objectives?
What will you include in a
rubric or other postassessment activity to find
out?
yes
no
suggestions
4. Re-read the goals and objectives listed for the lesson. Do the planned pre-reading, during reading
and post-reading activities help students work toward them? ___yes ___ no. If not, please offer
suggestions for how the plan could fit more specifically with the goals and objectives.
5. Adaptations
For focus student, are specific notations about adaptations for academic, social and/or linguistic
support made that match with information provided about the students needs? Yes
What questions/suggestions do you have about possible adaptations that may need to be made?
If Alex is being disruptive, will you have him go in the hallway or to his seat to calm down?
6. Assessment
Is there a concrete post-assessment plan or rubric for knowing whether the students are progressing
toward each lesson goal? Yes, make sure to attach it before you send it to Dawnmarie.
If not, please offer suggestions:
Facilitator of
Interaction
Facilitator of
Interpretation
Respondent
Evaluator
3. Questions and Type of Thinking: Judith Langer argues that teachers need to focus their attention
on helping readers understand literature to promote the intellectual development of the human mind.
She says that open-ended questions serve as thought tappers to support and extend students
thinking, and she points out that different question types are likely to tap a different stance, providing
students with an array of vantage points from which to muse about a piece (1990, p. 816).
Some question types for literature discussions include:
a) Probing initial understandings: Once students share their responses, teachers or students
can ask questions that encourage students to ponder their own responses and concerns.
b) Developing interpretations: Teachers or students can ask questions that move students to
deeper and more reasoned responsesexplore motivations, causes and implicationsboth as
they read and how they think the piece might end.
c) Reflecting on personal experiences: Teachers or students can ask questions that help
students make connections between the text and their personal knowledge and experience
rethink current or previous understandings, feelings or questions.
d) Elaborating and extending interpretations: Eventually, teachers and students can
encourage one another to:
analyze, evaluate, argue and defend
compare this selection with other selections
compare their own understandings with others interpretations
use literary elements to extend meaning
do a critical analysis of the selection
Langer (1990), Almasi (1996) and McGee (1996) contrast these types of questions with those that
simply ask students to engage in a recitation. Questions asked during literature recitations
include:
e) Remembering, recalling or retelling: Teachers ask questions that require reporting about
events in stories, recalling characters, and so on. The answers are already known by simply
reading the text.
Review your audio tape one more time to consider the nature of the questions you asked and
the questions students asked. Consider also how those questions may have influenced the content
of the discussion. Fill in the three-column chart below where you list at least 3 questions you asked
and 3 questions students asked at any time during the lesson (pre-reading, during reading, after
reading, post-assessment). Then record student response(s), and your explanation of which category
best describes the question and level of thinking generated. (Note: You may have some blank cells in
this table if you do not find any examples during your discussion or if you were not able to capture
some contributions on your audio tape.)
B) Developing interpretations
C) Reflecting on experiences
Student question:
Student question:
Student question:
PART B: Use the information above to interpret what happened as you respond to the questions
below.
4. Interpretation of Evidence: Based on the evidence produced for question 1 (participation and turntaking), 2 (teacher and student roles), and question 3 (questions and level of thinking), please
respond to the following questions. Explain your thinking and use specific evidence from the
information you provided above to support your claims:
Students were given opportunities to participate through out the lesson. In the pre reading,
students were given the chance to raise their hand to share with others if they had friends, had to make
new friends or if they ever felt lonely. This gave students a warm up into sharing their ideas and
experiences with the class but without having to speak. For the few shy students in the class, who also
tend to not be confident they were more comfortable raising their hand then when they were called on
during the discussion. During reading, I asked questions and had students raise their hand if they had
something to share. Due to time constraints that would affect the entire lesson, I was not able to call on all
the students who had ideas to share. I tried to call on students whose hand may not be raised but asked if
they had something to share in order to help everyone participate. After reading, students made
comments about what they thought the theme of the book was and would then call on a student whose
hand was raised. I encouraged them to call on students who had not said anything before. I made an
effort to give all students an opportunity to get involved and engaged but I think I could do better next time
given more time for the lesson.
After teaching the lesson, I realized I did not give students enough time or guidance in generating
questions. Although they had a space on their worksheet to ask the author questions, I should have put a
place to write down a question they would ask other students. I could have also allowed students to ask
questions during the reading of the book. I could have asked them if they had any questions about what
might happen or why something happened. I modeled these behaviors but I did not tell them why I was
doing it. Perhaps if I had explained to them that these are good reader behaviors and I wanted them to
think of similar questions, they could have been able to generate questions. While students did connect
the book to experiences in their lives, they did not do may other higher level thinking in the lesson. They
did not analyze the text or question it. I hope that with more practice students can start to do these types
of higher-level thinking.
During the discussion students tried to use the linking statements. After looking at the
assessment and how students performed during the lesson, I decided to alter the objective to include only
the linking statement of I agree with The students only used this one and I think having three at once
to work on was too much. Students would say a comment about the theme such as thinking it was about
how to make friends and then call on a student whose hand was raised. The second student almost
always said they agreed with the first student and then said why. This happened throughout the lesson.
Almost all the students used this statement and I believe they are working towards the objective as a
result.
Although students did not ask each other questions, I believe my lesson turned out to be more of
a discussion than a recitation. Since students did not ask each other questions this aspect fits better
under the Inquisitor category of a recitation. In regards to Facilitator of Interaction, students were not
called on by the teacher but instead called on each other based on raised hands. This is evidence of a
discussion as well. However students did not fulfill all aspects of this role and did not ensure they
remained on the topic or encouraging each other to participate. I would have liked to see the bolder
students with more confidence, being encouraging to the shy students to share their ideas. In regards to
Interpretation, students did a very good job relating elements of the book to their lives and provided many
examples such as describing a time their friend was mean to them and how it made them feel. However,
students did not discuss the authors craft or the characters, or question each other. Even though the
discussion did not fulfill these elements, it was not a recitation because students did think about what
helps them to understand the text. The respondent role details the student responding to each others
questions but since they did not ask each other questions, this was not completely satisfied but the
students did respond and connect to others comments with the linking statements. Students did respond
to the teacher questions while the book was being read however. The reading of the book fits more under
a recitation as a result. Finally in the role of Evaluator students did not challenge each other but supported
each others ideas with the linking statement. They need to work on why though. Many would share a
similar experience but would not connect the experiences. For example, student A described how their
siblings can be demanding like Lucy and student B agreed and shared a similar experience. The students
need to work on describing how the ideas connect. During the lesson, activities flowed smoothly but since
it was the students first experience taking control over a discussion of a book I do not think they had
enough time to get used to the style. They still required scaffolding on what to do during the discussion of
the book.
5. Post-Assessments are used to help teachers gather specific information about what each student
learned or took away from the lesson. Fill in the chart below to summarize your post-assessment and
to briefly discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the post-assessment tool used.
whole class
small group
focus student(s)
Artifact(s) Used (e.g., written assignment, checklist): filled out a chart and used examples
List the objective(s) that were
included on your lesson plan
below
a. Strengths: What was useful about this assessment approach? It was a familiar format for students
who had experience with circling faces that correspond to how they think they did. It also would work
well to track the use of the Linking Statements over many lessons.
b. Limitations: What did the approach lack in helping you assess student learning? Although
students had experience with the format, they were not sure what equates each face such as how
many uses counts as very good. They asked many questions and seemed to get caught up in this
portion of the assessment.
c. Revisions: How might you revise your post-assessment to address the limitations? I would write
on the assessment how many uses by each face option to make it more explicit for the students. While
it would be great for students to access with out a standard and to make the judgment themselves, I
think their lack of experience with a format like that would have hindered the results.
6. Your Learning: Explain what you learned from teaching this lesson and from your post-assessment
about the following, using specific examples:
I learned a lot as a result of my lesson including information about my students, the content, the
story and myself. In regards to my students, I learned that they have lots of ideas to share. They were sad
and bummed when I had to stop taking answers to the questions during the story. This also shows me
that the book was good selection and was able to engage students. Many students always had something
to share but the lesson also inspired students who do not talk as often. One student in particular does not
participate in class and often gets behind in class. However, during the discussion she was smiling and
could not wait to share her personal experience. Perhaps this is how she gets motivated to participate. I
also learned my students do their best when they do not have supplies to handle while sitting at their
classroom risers. The students sat on the risers during the discussion with their story outline worksheet.
Although I intended this to be a reference tool for the students it became more of a distraction. They kept
flopping it around and making noise with the paper. Even when I asked them to stop and keep the paper
still, it was a noise distraction. Thus I learned the students need more direction on how to have materials
at the risers or not have any.
Through the results of the assessment I learned that my students need more time to work on the
content of the lesson. They only utilized the one linking statement and only did so on average once. Thus
I think the content was too much when it includes more than one linking statement. This taught me to
keep my goals and objectives simple and obtainable in one or two lessons. In regards to the students, it
informed me that they could only work on simple objectives when it involves a new format such as the
discussion. In addition, the assessment showed me to also keep post assessments simple as well.
Students got caught up in what to do if they had not used one of the linking statements. With the limited
time I had to teach the lesson, I think if they had not been distracted by this element then I would have
gotten better results. Thus I need to make my assessments simple and clear.
Lastly, I learned about myself. I learned that when I get engaged in the text and change my voice
for characters, students will respond. My level of engagement influences the students. I need to keep this
is mind in the future. In addition, even when I teach something in the future that I am not thrilled to teach, I
can use this ability to engage students to make them excited about a challenging topic for example. I
gained confidence in my ability to teach students and to manage them. While there were some behavioral
distractions I was also able to get the students to stop by informing them of their distraction such as
talking. These are some of the things I learned as the result of teaching the lesson and reflecting on it.
7. Next Steps: Now think about potential revisions to this lesson and what follow-up lessons are
needed.
If I were to teach this again I would make some changes. One change I would make is to simplify
the objective and make it only one linking statement. I think this would be more manageable in one or two
lessons. Thus, for this lesson I would change the objective to Students will link their comments to
remarks of others after being the teacher reads a fiction story by using linking statement such as I agree
with Another change I would make is to not teach children how to have a discussion while having
another objective. It seemed like a lot to accomplish in one session. My mentor teacher suggested that to
teach the students the format and structure of the discussion that the students learn in small groups. She
believed this would give students practice before coming all together and thus more students would
participate and more. I think this is a good idea because it gives students a less formal situation to learn
with less peers. Also, working in small groups would make it easier for me to scaffolding and model for the
students how a discussion works. Another change I would make would be in the assessment. I would
simplify it and have students circle a smiley for their efforts and then provide an example of their use of
the linking statement. The hope of this change is that students can give a more accurate assessment of
their work. These are some changes that I would make to the lesson.
Students still need to work on using the linking statement I agree with. More specifically they
need to work on explaining how what they say following this linking statement connects with the other
student. They need to explain why they agree with more than a personal example. Students also need to
work on using all of the statements as the original objective stated. They only used the agree linking
statement. However, I think with more experiences and practice students will easily complete the
objectives. They just need time to get accustomed to the discussion style and the use of the linking
statements. Thus, the students are on their way to complete the objective. If I were to teach a follow up
lesson I would either work on students using the linking statements more and giving and explanation. I
could have students work and perfect the agree statement or move on to a lesson using the disagree
statement. I would chose to teach these as a follow up lesson because I want students to be able to use
all the statements with confidence.