Assignment Rubrics

Criteria

Weight

Strategy of
teaching science

Fair

Above average

Excellent

2
The introduction
previewed the
structure of the
paper in a clear
manner.

3
The introduction
previewed the
structure of the paper
and objectives in a
clear manner.

4
The introduction
previewed the structure
and objectives of the
paper clearly. Important
concepts were also
clearly explained.

No discussion
on current
achievement

No focus on current
achievement

Vague description
of current
achievement

No literature
search.

Insignificant literature
search on supporting the
current achievement

Describe clearly the

details of current
achievements with a
clear focus
3 correct references to
support the current
achievement

No discussion
on relationship
between KSSR
Science and
Vision 2020

No focus on relationship
between KSSR Science
and Vision 2020

1 correct reference
to support the
current
achievement
Vague description
of relationship
between KSSR
Science and Vision
2020

Describe in sufficient
detail of currant
achievements with a
clear focus
2 correct references to
support the current
achievement
Described in
sufficient detail of
relationship between
KSSR Science and
Vision 2020

Described clearly the

details of relationship
between KSSR Science
and Vision 2020

No discussion
on strategy of
teaching
science

Not discussion was

focused on strategy of
teaching science

The strategy of
teaching science was
clearly described.

The strategy of teaching

science was described
in detail.

0.5

Literature search
to Support for
current
achievement.
Relationships
between KSSR
Science and
Vision 2020.

Low
1
The introduction did not
mention the structure
and objectives of the
paper and important
concepts.

Introduction

Discussion on
current
achievement

Missing
Item
0
There was no
introduction to
the paper.

Vague description
of the strategy used
in teaching science

Max
Marks

12

12

Criteria

Weight

Organisation
0.5

Missing
Item
0
Not relevant

Low

Fair

1
2
Many details were not in Details were not in
logical order. There was logical order and
little sense that the
distracts the reader
writing was organised.
TOTAL MARKS

Above average

Excellent

3
Details were placed in
a logical order but
presented less
effectively

4
Details were placed in a
logical order and
presented effectively.
The paper was
interesting.

Max
Marks

2
40