Scribd Logo
Importer

Bienvenue sur Scribd !

  • Criteriond Evaluation

    Transféré par

    api-254014031
    11 vues2 pages
    This document contains Luna's self-evaluation and peer evaluation of a geography game they created. [1] Luna gave their game moderate scores in their self-evaluation, noting it could be more fun and challenging. [2] Peer feedback indicated the game was mostly satisfying but had weaknesses like only allowing players to answer one question without knowing if it was correct. [3] Luna made changes from the original design like removing time and points since the game structure did not support those elements, ending with a single question game rather than the planned multi-question format.

    Description originale:

    Titre original

    criteriond evaluation (1)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Formats disponibles

    PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd

    Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

    Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

    Signaler ce document
    This document contains Luna's self-evaluation and peer evaluation of a geography game they created. [1] Luna gave their game moderate scores in their self-evaluation, noting it could be more fun and challenging. [2] Peer feedback indicated the game was mostly satisfying but had weaknesses like only allowing players to answer one question without knowing if it was correct. [3] Luna made changes from the original design like removing time and points since the game structure did not support those elements, ending with a single question game rather than the planned multi-question format.

    Droits d'auteur :

    © All Rights Reserved
    Téléchargez comme PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
    Signaler comme contenu inapproprié
    11 vues2 pages

    Criteriond Evaluation

    Transféré par

    api-254014031
    This document contains Luna's self-evaluation and peer evaluation of a geography game they created. [1] Luna gave their game moderate scores in their self-evaluation, noting it could be more fun and challenging. [2] Peer feedback indicated the game was mostly satisfying but had weaknesses like only allowing players to answer one question without knowing if it was correct. [3] Luna made changes from the original design like removing time and points since the game structure did not support those elements, ending with a single question game rather than the planned multi-question format.

    Droits d'auteur :

    © All Rights Reserved
    Téléchargez comme PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
    Signaler comme contenu inapproprié
    sur 2

    Name:

    Luna

    Date:

    12Feb2015

    CriterionD.Evaluating

    DEADLINE:16Feb(T)12midnight

    PartI.ProductTesting
    A.Selftesting
    Rateyourowngameusingtherubricbelow.

    0:Notachieved

    12Minimallyachieved

    34:Moderatelyachieved

    56:Mostlyachieve
    d
    78:Fullyachieved

    Aspects:

    SelfScore

    ReasonsforScoreGiven

    1.Isitfunandengaging?

    ithinkitisgoodbecauseitteachesbutidon'tthinkpeoplehavemuchfun.

    2.Doesthegamehaveaclearandspecific
    educationaltopicorcontent?

    geography

    3.Aretheinstructionsclear?

    Itmightnotbecleartoeverybody.

    4.Isthegamechallenging?

    notreally

    5.Isthegameoriginaloramodification?

    modificationaremix

    6.Doesthegamehaveaspecifictarget
    audience?

    notreally

    7.Isthescriptorcodecorrectlydone?

    no

    8.Wereimagesandsoundscreatively
    used?

    yesitwasfullofimages.

    B.PeerEvaluation
    1.Askatleast5peopletoplayyourgameandansweryoursurvey.
    Putthelinkstoyourgameandsurveyhere:
    surveylink:
    http://goo.gl/Ki5RCA
    gamelink:
    http://goo.gl/zagQeA

    2.Whenyouhavegathered
    atleast5feedbacks
    inyoursurvey,postthe
    linktothesummaryofresults(theonewith
    graphs
    below.

    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17Qjnbt22n6j1nsKA_9K1G4WUezmEl8e4o7M4nOv86gQ/edit#gid=1803012070

    3.Comparetheresultsofyourevaluationsurveytoyourselfevaluation.Completethetablebelow.

    Accordingtoyourselfevaluation

    Accordingtoyoursurveyresults

    a.Howwelldidyourfinal
    productsatisfy
    your
    design
    specification
    ?

    Notverywell.
    Myfirstgamedidn'twork.

    Mostlysatisfiedbutnotineverything.

    b.Strongpointsofyour
    finalproduct

    Itmayteachpeoplemorestufftheydidn'tknow.

    Itteachespeople.


    c.Weakpointsand
    suggestionsfor
    improvement

    thepeopledon'tgettotesttheirownknowledgeand
    thereonlyisonequestion.

    onlygettoansweronequestion.doesn'tsayifyou
    gettherightanswer.

    PartII.SuccessoftheFinalProduct
    1.Didyoustrictlyandthoroughlyfollowyouroriginalplananddesign?Ifnot,describethechangesthatyoumadetothe
    finalproduct,andgivereasonswhyyoumadethesechanges.

    Changesmadetotheoriginaldesignandplan:

    Reasonsforthesechanges:

    1.time

    ididn'tputtimebecauseitwasn'taverygoodtypeofgamewhereyou
    puttime.

    2.points

    Thegameisntaansweringquestiongameandsoididn'tputthe
    points.

    3.answeringquestions

    thereisonlyonequestiontheplayeranswers,andmygamewas
    supposedtobefullofquestions.

    4.

    5.

    2.Generally,howwelldoyouthinkyourfinalscreencastingsuccessfullyachieveditsoriginalgoalorpurpose:todesignan
    engaginglearninggame?
    Ithinkitworkedbecausepeoplesaidtheylearntnewthingsaboutgeography.

    3.Discussthe
    impactofyourfinalproduc
    t.

    Discussatleast3benefitsofusingyourgamebyyour
    targetaudience?

    Discussatleast3limitationsordisadvantagesofusing
    yourgame?

    learningmoreaboutgeography
    humour
    attentionskills

    onlyansweronequestion
    doesn'tsayiftheansweriscorrect
    long

    Vous aimerez peut-être aussi