Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Kexin XU
Management of Business Operations
Issue Description
XU2
I was working in a Finance and Wealth Management Company CreditEast in winter of year 2014. This company has thousands of
sales in China main cities. I was working in a new branch in my hometown Shenyang. This company has experienced high liquidity of
Sales person. I was also one of these. Mostly new employees only work there for less than three months. The employees in CreditEase
have working in the best office building in my hometown. And salary is also above the average. But why the CreditEase still suffer from
the high liquidity of salesmen. So, Ishikawa Diagram analysis is very helpful to find out the specific reasons at this issue. And
Prioritization Matrix would also be a good tool to weight the factors
Ishikawa Diagram
XU3
External
Environment
area
Products
Sustainability
Publicize
of Brand
Market
Environment
Competitors
Not
Encourage
Basic Salary
Working
Environment
Careless
Communication
Skill
Company
Environment
Basic
Salary
Pay less
attention
Training
Reputation
Sales
Strategy
Attitude
towards New
sales
Manager
Sale Strategy
Job-hopping
Not
Patient
Skills
Rebates
to Sales
Employee
Welfare
Rebates to
Sales
Employee
Welfare
Sales Skill
Attitude
towards New
Sales
Careless
Lack of
Cooperation
Not very
loyal to
Company
Seldom
Teach new
Salesmen
High
liquidity of
New
Salesmen
Promotion
Development
Career Plan
New Employees
Old Employees
Not Confident
Sales Skill
Lack of
Belongingness
Communication
Skills
Pressure
Lack of Experience
Nervous
Skills
Salesmen
Sense
XU4
Prioritization Matrix
Frequency
Importanc
e
Causal/Contributory Factor
1
3
3
4
5
4
2
2
5
5
2
2
1
1
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
2
2
5
4
5
5
5
4
3
4
5
2
2
2
2
3
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
2
Feasibility
Sum
Product
4
5
4
5
4
4
4
4
4
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
2
2
2
4
2
7
13
11
14
14
13
10
9
13
15
5
5
4
4
6
5
8
9
8
10
10
12
6
8
75
48
100
100
80
32
24
80
125
4
4
2
2
6
4
18
27
18
32
32
64
8
XU5
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
6
6
7
8
8
12
Ps. Rate each causal factor from 1-5 on each one of the dimensions. Remember that the higher the rating in each area, the more the factor rises to the top to be
investigated or addressed. Therefore, if the factor is feasibility, 5 is most feasible, 1 least. If the factor is cost, 5 is the least costly, 1 is the most costly.