Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
II.
III.
IV.
V.
D- Once the clip has run its course, I will pass out a worksheet on the
Holocaust, which I will have the students read out loud. I will preface the
worksheet by tying it into Mein Kamf, reminding them the year it was written,
so that they realize that the idea of a final solution was already in Hitlers
head. After the worksheet I will introduce Hitlers Top 6 officials and explain
their roles. I will simultaneously pass around photos of them with their name
on it so students have a visual. Once that is done, and I reiterate that once
Hitler becomes Chancellor in 1933 he begins to spew anti-Semistism to the
German people, I will pass out a Nuremburgh Law worksheet which students
will work on in pairs for 10 minutes. Once that is completed I will read the
students the Top Secret Authorization letter from Goering to Heydrich, while
holding up a copy of the primary document. I will tie that into the Top Secret
Wannsee Protocol, which I have a copy of, reading specific highlighted parts
that discuss the Final Solution. Hopefully a student chomps at the bit and
realizes that these were all intended to remain top secret, and ask questions. If
not, I will let them know the background story as to how these became public
knowledge. When that is done, I will play a clip from the movie Conspiracy.
A- When we have concluded the lesson I will begin an open discussion with
the students about Hitlers top 6 men, and review their roles in Nazi Germany.
Domain 3b Student Participation
VI.
VII.
Appendix B
Lesson Analysis and Reflection Rubric
(6 total points)
No evidence
0-2
Below
Expectations
Meets
Expectations
Exceeds
Expectations
3-4
Reflects on
degree to
which learning
goals were met
citing specific
examples.
Does not
mention if
learning goals
are met.
Mentions
learning goals
but makes
inaccurate
statements as to
whether or not
they are met.
Mentions
learning goals,
whether they
are met, cites
accurate
examples
Mentions
learning goals,
cites accurate
examples, and
evidence
showing the
degree to which
they were met.
Takes
feedback and
uses it to
influence
instruction/ins
tructional
strategies.
Does not
consider
feedback from
Cooperating
Teacher,
University
Supervisor
and/or Seminar
Instructor.
Mentions
feedback but
does not
discuss how it
was used to
influence
instruction.
Mentions
feedback and
discusses how
it was used to
influence
instruction.
Discusses and
reflects on prior
feedback and
how it was used
to change
instruction/stud
ent learning
citing specific
examples from
the lesson.
Discusses
performance
in each
domain
Does not
discuss
performance in
each of the four
domains.
Discusses
performance in
each of the four
domains.
Discusses
performance in
each of the four
domains and
cites specific
examples.
Discusses
performance in
each of the four
domains, cites
specific
examples, and
includes
artifacts.
No evidence
0-2
Below
Expectations
Meets
Expectations
Exceeds
Expectations
3-4
Lists and
reflects on
personal
teaching goals
Does not
mention any
personal
teaching goals
Lists 1-2
personal
teaching goals.
Lists 1-2
personal
teaching goals
with
reasoning/evide
nce.
Conventions,
organization,
composed
writing
Writing is
disorganized
and includes
many grammar
and convention
mistakes (5 or
more mistakes)
Writing is
disorganized
and includes
several
grammar and
convention
mistakes (3 or
more mistakes)
Writing is
organized,
includes proper
grammar and
conventions.
Writing is
organized,
includes proper
grammar and
conventions.
(One or more
mistakes)
(Zero mistakes)
Appendix C
Developing 1-2
Planning and
Planning and
1a.
instruction reflect
Demonstrati instruction reflect
-content
errors
awareness of
ng
knowledge of -lack of knowledge -content
-prerequisite
content and of prerequisite
relationships
relationships
pedagogy
-lack
of knowledge
Teacher
demonstrates -instructional
Planning and
1b.
instruction represent
Demonstrati little or no
knowledge of
that the teacher has
ng
-student
development
some general
knowledge of
-learning process
knowledge of the
students
-student interests and following and
needs
applies the
-special needs
knowledge to the
backgroundsclass
as a whole:
Instructional
Instructional
1c. Setting -cultural
instructional outcomes are
-not appropriate for
outcomes
content and/or
students
-low level
No knowledge of or
1d.
Demonstrati use of resources to
enhance
ng
knowledge of -instruction
-professional
resources
development
-student need
outcomes are
-appropriate for
some students
-listed as activities
and goals
Teacher shows some
familiarity with
resources available;
however, does not
seek to use them to
improve
-instruction
-professional
development
Designs
instruction
1e. Designing Instruction
-is not aligned with that
coherent
-is partially aligned
instruction instructional
outcomes
with instructional
-does not follow
outcomes
organized structure -may engage few
-is not suitable for all students in higher
students
level learning
Proficient 3-4
Distinguished 5
Components Unsatisfactory 0
Developing 1-2
Proficient 3-4
Distinguished 5
Developing 1-2
Proficient 3-4
Distinguished 5
Components
Communicating
with students
Unsatisfactory 0
-Teacher
communication is
unclear or confusing
to the students.
-Teacher uses
language that contains
errors or is
inappropriate to the
students cultures and
developmental levels.
Developing 1-2
Teacher
-communicates
expectations for
learning
-communicates
directions and
procedures
-clarifies explanations
of content after initial
confusion.
-uses language that is
correct but may not be
appropriate to students
cultures and
developmental levels.
Proficient 3-4
Teacher clearly
communicates:
-expectations for
learning
-directions and
procedures
-explanations of
content
Communications are
appropriate to
students cultures
developmental
levels.
Using questioning
and discussion
techniques
Questions are
-low level and
inappropriate
-limited to one student
participating
-recitation, not
discussion
Questions
-are low level
-promote one student to
answer at a time
-allow few
opportunities for
students to discuss, ask
questions
Engaging students
in learning
Distinguis
Teacher cl
communic
-expectatio
learning (l
outcomes
assessmen
-directions
procedures
-accurate e
of content
written
communic
-clear and
-appropria
developme
and culture
-anticipate
student qu
Questions
discussion
-require st
think on a
-promote a
discussion
students
-promote c
and develo
appropriat
discussion
questions
-promote s
develop an
level quest
ensure tha
are heard
All studen
-are engag
level think
discussing
explanatio
thinking
-work to e
other in di
and learnin
experience
Components
Unsatisfactory 0
fast.
Developing 1-2
to explain thinking.
The lesson has a
recognizable structure
but lacks appropriate
pace.
Using assessment
in instruction
Demonstrating
flexibility and
responsiveness
Teacher
-adheres to lesson plan
-does not adjust to
meet student needs
-does not answer
student questions
Teacher
-attempts to modify
lesson
-has limited use of
instructional strategies
Proficient 3-4
materials and
resources
The lessons
structure is coherent,
with appropriate
pace.
Distinguis
-make con
learning ex
group wor
-are engag
effectively
materials a
resources
-have oppo
reflect on t
thinking
Structure a
allow for s
reflection
-Assessments are
-Assessme
used regularly
throughou
throughout
informal a
instruction and
-Assessme
provide high quality if all stude
feedback.
learning ob
-Students self-Both stud
assess.
teachers se
-Students are fully
and monito
aware of assessment -Both stud
criteria.
teachers pr
meaningfu
Teacher
Teacher
-promotes successful -monitors
learning of all
lesson
students
-is flexible
-monitors and
responsive
adjusts instruction
-takes opp
-accommodates
build on an
questions, needs,
learning
and interests of
-uses exten
learners
repertoire
instruction
Components
Components
Participating
in a
professional
community
Proficient 3-4
Distinguished 5
-Engages in several
Growing and
engage in
professional
professional development
developing
professional
development
experiences.
professionally
development. experiences.
-Welcomes feedback.
-Resists
-Reluctantly
-Participates in and
feedback.
accepts feedback. contributes to profession.
-Does not share -Makes few
knowledge
contributions to
with
peers.
profession. -Teacher displays honesty,
-Professional the
-Professional
Showing
professionalism interactions are interactions are integrity, and
dishonest.
honest.
confidentiality.
-Teacher shows -Teacher shows -Teacher assures that all
lack of
inconsistent
students are fairly served.
awareness of attempts to serve -Teacher complies with
student needs. students.
school/district regulations.
-Teachers
-Teacher does not
decisions are always comply
self-serving. with
professional development
opportunities both online and
face-to- face.
-Welcomes feedback.
-Participates in and contributes
to profession.
-Uses information from
professional
resources
to in
Teacher shows
leadership
Appendix A
Student Teacher Evaluation Form for Videotaped Lesson
Lesson plans reflect coherent instructional design, which includes clear, sequenced
procedure that is aligned with instructional goals and assessments
__1__
Lesson plans have a clear assessment(s) that measures whether all students can meet the
lesson instructional goals
__1__
_0___
Uses different levels of questioning and discussion strategies that engages all students in
higher level thinking
____1
Uses different types of instructional strategies that actively engage the learners
throughout the lesson
__1__
Checks for understanding throughout the lesson and adjusts lesson to meet needs of
student(s)
___1_
__1__
___1_
Provides opportunities for independent practice that challenges students and allows them
to apply what they have learned
__1__
__1___
__1__
Professionalism (1 point)
_1___
Student teacher exhibits professionalism in appearance and written and spoken language
in lesson plans and during videotaped lesson
Lesson Reflection (6 points)
(Use Lesson Analysis and Reflection Rubric to evaluate reflection)
__6__
Student teacher views his/her videotape and shows evidence of being a reflective
practitioner in video reflection/reflects on the above (lesson planning, quality of
instruction, classroom management and professionalism)
Reflection on Domain 3
I seem to have the only version of Microsoft Word that does not allow comments. I had to
create a text box after I went to the Geek Squad who could not find my Comment box. They also
couldnt find a proper footer/header. Guess I will be investing in a new laptop soon.
Anyhow, I feel like my overall performance in Domain 3 has been pleasant. In this
particular class, US 2, my content knowledge is exactly where it should be. I have no issues
answering questions posed by students; I am very comfortable with the material. Because of that,
instruction goes a bit smoother with them (as opposed to my US 1 classes).
This class ran smoothly. It was the first time a class I had taught followed the lesson plan
to a T. From the moment the students walked in, I was able to connect everything together from
previous classes. The opening scene from Band of Brothers was such a great table setter you
could hear a pin drop when they came across the concentration camp. The students were so very
interested in learning about Hitlers Top 6. When I read the letter from Goering to Heydrich,
again you could hear a pin drop. The snippets that I chose to read from the Wannsee Protocol,
followed up with the clips from the movie Conspiracy, really drew the students in. The students
were in disbelief that the Nazis were that nonchalant about murdering millions of Jews.
One thing I must work on in this domain is assessment. The next class the students are
getting a pop quiz when they come in the room, so I will be able to assess how I did as an
instructor the previous class. Something tells me they really got this lesson. World War 2 has
been easier for them to learn because we have access to so many primary sources. These sources
make it more tangible, and easier to understand.
I recognize that lessons are not always going to run like a well-oiled machine. But this
time around, it did and I (as well as my cooperating teacher) was very pleased with the end
result.