19. RAFAEL E. MANINANG and SOLEDAD L. MANINANG, petitioners, vs.

COURT OF
APPEALS, HON. RICARDO L. PRONOVE, JR., as Judge of the Court of First Instance of
Rizal and BERNARDO S. ASENETA, respondents.
Topic: Production and Probate of Will, Rule 75

FACTS:
1.
Clemencia Aseneta died at the Manila Sanitarium. She left a holographic will all her
real properties and personal properties shall be inherited by Dra. Soledad Maninang.
2.

Petitioner Soledad filed a petition for probate of the will of the decedent.

3.
Aseneta who as the adopted son, claims to be the sole heir of the decedent. He filed a
motion to dismiss the testate case on the ground that the holographic will was null and void
because he, as the only compulsory heir, was preterited and therefore, intestacy should ensue.
4.
In her Opposition to said Motion to Dismiss, petitioner Soledad averred that it is still the
rule that in a case for probate of a Will, the Court's area of inquiry is limited to an examination of
and resolution on the extrinsic validity of the will; and that respondent Bernardo was effectively
disinherited by the decedent.
5.

The lower court dismissed the testate case.

6.
CA denied petitioners certiorari and rule that the trial judges order of dismissal was final
in nature and therefore appeal is the proper remedy.
ISSUE: Whether or not the lower court correctly dismissed the testate case.
HELD:
No. The law enjoins or directs the probate of the Will and public policy requires it,
because unless the Will is probated and notice thereof given to the whole world, the right
of a person to dispose of his property by Will may be rendered nugatory.
Normally, the probate of a Will does not look into its intrinsic validity.
The authentication of a will decides no other question than such as touch upon the
capacity of the testator and the compliance with those requisites or solemnities which the law
prescribes for the validity of wills. It does not determine nor even by implication prejudge the
validity or efficiency (sic) of the provisions, these may be impugned as being vicious or null,
notwithstanding its authentication. The que0stions relating to these points remain entirely
unaffected, and may be raised even after the will has been authenticated ...
As a general rule, in a probate case, only the extrinsic validity of the will should be
examined. The exception is where practical considerations demand that the intrinsic validity of
the will be passed upon, before it is probated.