Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 14

Design Verification Test Report

Test Description: Tensile Force Tests of Contacts Crimped at Multiple Tool Settings

Product Number / Product Identification: Revision A

Test Period: November 5-7, 2014

Test Report Number: TR-14-0012

Test Report Revision: A

Test Protocol Reference Number (if applicable):

Customer (if applicable):

Product Tester(s): R. Dobrzynski and D. Addison

Prepared By:

R. Dobrzynski and D. Addison

Reviewed By:

J. Meszaros

Report Date:

November 7, 2014

Approved By:
Date:

FORM: EF 2.04.03-1 REV Page 1 of 14

Design Verification Test Report

1.

Test Procedures and Equipment


1.1
Test Description: Examination of Product (Dimensional). Ref. TP-14-0012-01 section 3.1
1.1.1
Test Sample Description:
1.1.1.1 Re-designed crimp pin, revision A, un-plated.
1.1.1.2 Sample population consists of (3) units
1.1.2
Test Equipment:

FORM: EF 2.04.03-1 REV Page 2 of 14

Design Verification Test Report


1.1.3

1.1.2.1 #T-909 (Caliper), calibration due 10/31/15


1.1.2.2 Reference gage pins verified with #T-391 (micrometer) before use.
Micrometer calibration due 10/31/15
Applicable Standard:
Yes

If YES, list Standard (e.g. IEC, EIA,


etc.)

No

drawing #103422 Revision A


1.1.4
1.1.5

Procedure:
1.1.4.1 Measure crimp area o.d., i.d. and depth dimensions.
1.1.4.2 Record results on form EF2.04-04-4 for PQR #3536.
Acceptance Criteria

Pass Criteria Specified

If Yes, List all


applicable
O.D. 0.074 0.002

Pass Criteria Specified

I.D. 0.036 0.001

NA

Pass Criteria Specified

Depth 0.31 0.01

NA

Yes

1.1.6

Sample
1
2
3
1.1.8

No

If YES, describe
deviation
NA

Test Results
0.074 0.002
0.074
0.074
0.074

P/F
P
P
P

0.036 0.001
0.036
0.036
0.036

P/F
P
P
P

0.31 0.01
0.310
0.308
0.312

P/F
P
P
P

Summary / Conclusion
All Criteria
Pass

1.2

If No, List Reason (e.g., Specification to be


developed from test, information only, other)
NA

Deviations (Customer and/or Internal; If YES, describe deviation and attach evidence)
Yes

1.1.7

No

All Criteria
Fail

Partial Criteria
Pass

Data Review
Required?

Test Description: Examination of Product (Visual). Ref. TP-14-0012-01 Section(s) 3.2, 3.3, 3.5 & 3.6
1.2.1
Test Sample Description: Duplex cable #453564381001 (#104936-01) prepared and terminated
to plated crimp pin #103422, using one crimp tool, according to the following procedure.
1.2.1.1 Cut duplex cable into 8 lengths (18 lengths per test group). Note, 3 lengths are spares
1.2.1.2 Split cable into separate legs along jacket web for entire length (36 legs per test group)
1.2.1.3 Remove jacket & shield over full length & label both ends with unique serial number
1.2.1.4 Strip conductive layer & insulation at 7/16 long both ends
1.2.1.5 Set tool selector & verify with go/no-go gage per table 1. Set pressure gage at 100 psi.
1.2.1.6 Insert wire into contact barrel until strands are visible within inspection window both ends
1.2.1.7 Place contact & wire into tool positioner at blue turret location & crimp both ends
1.2.1.8 Re-check tool selector setting at completion of test group with go/no gage per table 1
DMC #WA27F (Crimp Tool) S/N 807298 with DMC #TH1A (Positioner) Cage #11851

FORM: EF 2.04.03-1 REV Page 3 of 14

Design Verification Test Report


Test Group
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Sample Qty
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
2

Tool Selector
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Go Dia.
0.028
0.032
0.036
0.039
0.045
0.052
0.059
0.068

No-Go Dia.
0.033
0.037
0.041
0.044
0.050
0.057
0.064
0.073

Gage No.
T-391*
T-492
T-480
T-449
T-623
T-629
T-626
T-638

Gage Calibration
Due 10/31/15*
Due 10/31/15
Due 10/31/15
Due 3/31/15
Due 3/31/15
Due 3/31/15
Due 3/31/15
Due 3/31/15

*Go/No-Go Gage unavailable. Used reference gage pins verified with T-391 (micrometer)

Table 1
1.2.2
1.2.3

Test Equipment:
1.2.2.1 Bausch & Lomb Stereozoom 7 (Microscope), calibration N/A
Applicable Standard(s):
Yes

1.2.4

1.2.5

If Yes, List all applicable

No

Gap between wire insulation & contact < 2X dia.


Indenters centered within crimp barrel
Wire strands visible within inspection window
Loose strand(s) outside of contact crimp barrel
Cracks visible in contact crimp barrel
1.2.6

Yes

If YES, list Standard (e.g. IEC,


EIA, etc.)
IPC/WHMA-A-620 Section 5.3

Procedure: Inspect crimped contact for each of the following per class 1 of standard
1.2.4.1 Insulation clearance between back of contact and end of wire insulation
1.2.4.2 Indenter position within contact crimp barrel
1.2.4.3 Wire strand visibility within contact inspection window
1.2.4.4 Strand visibility outside of contact
1.2.4.5 Cracks visibility within contact crimp barrel
Acceptance Criteria:

Yes
Pass Criteria Specified
Pass Criteria Specified
Pass Criteria Specified
Fail Criteria Specified
Fail Criteria Specified

No

Deviations (Customer and/or Internal; If YES, describe deviation and attach evidence):

No

If YES, describe deviation


Revised wire strip length from 3/4 to 7/16 for compliance to IPC standard.
Added Test Groups 7 & 8 to check full range of crimp tool settings
1.2.7
Test Results:
Group 1

Gaging

If No, List Reason (e.g., Specification to be


developed from test, information only, other)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA

P/F

Group 2

Reason (if failure)

Gaging

P/F

Reason (if failure)

Pre

NA

Pre

NA

Sample

P/F

Reason (if failure)

Sample

P/F

Reason (if failure)

1 crack in crimp area

NA

3 cracks in crimp area

NA

NA

NA

4 cracks in crimp area

NA

4 cracks in crimp area

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

3 cracks in crimp area

NA

FORM: EF 2.04.03-1 REV Page 4 of 14

Design Verification Test Report


9

4 cracks in crimp area

NA

10
11

1 crack in crimp area

10

NA

3 cracks in crimp area

11

NA

12

1 crack in crimp area

12

NA

13

1 crack in crimp area

13

NA

14

2 cracks in crimp area

14

NA

15

2 cracks in crimp area

15

NA

16

2 cracks in crimp area

16

NA

17

1 crack in crimp area

17

NA

18

NA

18

NA

19

2 cracks in crimp area

19

NA

20

2 cracks in crimp area

20

NA

21

3 cracks in crimp area

21

NA

22

1 crack in crimp area

22

NA

23

2 cracks in crimp area

23

NA

24

1 crack in crimp area

24

NA

25

1 crack in crimp area

25

NA

26

1 crack in crimp area

26

NA

27

2 cracks in crimp area

27

NA

28

1 crack in crimp area

28

NA

29

NA

29

NA

30

NA

30

NA

Gaging

P/F

Reason (if failure)

Gaging

P/F

Reason (if failure)

Post

NA

Post

NA

Gaging

P/F

Reason (if failure)

Gaging

P/F

Group 3

Group 4
Reason (if failure)

Pre

NA

Pre

NA

Sample

P/F

Reason (if failure)

Sample

P/F

Reason (if failure)

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

10

NA

10

NA

11

NA

11

NA

12

NA

12

NA

13

NA

13

NA

14

NA

14

NA

FORM: EF 2.04.03-1 REV Page 5 of 14

Design Verification Test Report


15

NA

15

NA

16

NA

16

NA

17

NA

17

NA

18

NA

18

NA

19

NA

19

NA

20

NA

20

NA

21

NA

21

NA

22

NA

22

NA

23

NA

23

NA

24

NA

24

NA

25

NA

25

NA

26

NA

26

NA

27

NA

27

NA

28

NA

28

NA

29

NA

29

NA

30

NA

30

NA

Gaging

P/F

Reason (if failure)

Gaging

P/F

Reason (if failure)

Post

NA

Post

NA

Group 5

Group 6

Gaging

P/F

Reason (if failure)

Gaging

P/F

Reason (if failure)

Pre

NA

Pre

NA

Sample

P/F

Reason (if failure)

Sample

P/F

Reason (if failure)

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

10

NA

10

NA

11

NA

11

NA

12

NA

12

NA

13

NA

13

NA

14

NA

14

NA

15

NA

15

NA

16

NA

16

NA

17

NA

17

NA

18

NA

18

NA

19

NA

19

NA

FORM: EF 2.04.03-1 REV Page 6 of 14

Design Verification Test Report


20

NA

20

NA

21

NA

21

NA

22

NA

22

NA

23

NA

23

NA

24

NA

24

NA

25

NA

25

NA

26

NA

26

NA

27

NA

27

NA

28

NA

28

NA

29

NA

29

NA

30

NA

30

NA

Gaging

P/F

Reason (if failure)

Gaging

P/F

Reason (if failure)

Post

NA

Post

NA

Group 7

Group 8

Gaging

P/F

Reason (if failure)

Gaging

P/F

Reason (if failure)

Pre

NA

Pre

NA

Sample

P/F

Reason (if failure)

Sample

P/F

Reason (if failure)

NA

No Crimp Indentation Visible

NA

No Crimp Indentation Visible

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

10

NA

10

NA

NA

11

NA

11

NA

NA

12

NA

12

NA

NA

13

NA

13

NA

NA

14

NA

14

NA

NA

15

NA

15

NA

NA

16

NA

16

NA

NA

17

NA

17

NA

NA

18

NA

18

NA

NA

19

NA

19

NA

NA

20

NA

20

NA

NA

21

NA

21

NA

NA

22

NA

22

NA

NA

23

NA

23

NA

NA

24

NA

24

NA

NA

FORM: EF 2.04.03-1 REV Page 7 of 14

Design Verification Test Report


25

NA

25

NA

NA

26

NA

26

NA

NA

27

NA

27

NA

NA

28

NA

28

NA

NA

29

NA

29

NA

NA

30

NA

30

NA

NA

Gaging

P/F

Reason (if failure)

Gaging

P/F

Reason (if failure)

Post

NA

Post

NA

NA

Crimp Results by Test Group (Tool Setting)

Setting 1

Setting 2

Setting 3

Setting 4

Setting 5

Setting 6

Setting 7

Setting 8

1.2.8

Summary / Conclusion:

All Criteria Pass

FORM: EF 2.04.03-1 REV Page 8 of 14

All Criteria Fail

Partial Criteria Pass

Data Review Required?

Design Verification Test Report

1.3

Test Description: Pull Test to Destruction. Ref. TP-14-0012-01 Section(s) 3.3, 3.4, 3.5 & 3.6
1.3.1
Test Sample Description: Per section 1.2.1
1.3.2
Test Equipment:
1.3.2.1 DMC Alphatron #PT-150H, Serial #866795, Calibration Due 5/31/15
1.3.2.2 Bausch & Lomb Stereozoom 7 (Microscope), calibration N/A
1.3.3
Applicable Standard(s):
Yes

No

If YES, list Standard (e.g. IEC, EIA, etc.)


ANSI/EIA-364-08
NASA-STD-8739.4, Chapter 12

1.3.4

1.3.5

Procedure:
1.3.4.1
slotted grip per photo below.
1.3.4.2
below
1.3.4.3
until wire is removed
1.3.4.4
pulled out of contact
1.3.4.5

FORM: EF 2.04.03-1 REV Page 9 of 14

Place free end of sample between cam wheels per photo


Pull the operating lever back in a slow & consistent motion
Record pull force reading & whether wire strands broke or
Press the reset button

Acceptance Criteria:
Yes

Pass Criteria Specified

Select proper slot & place contact from sample into rear

If Yes, List all applicable


Pull Force 12 lbf

No

If No, List Reason (e.g., Specification to be


developed from test, information only, other)
NA

Design Verification Test Report


1.3.6

Deviations (Customer and/or Internal; If YES, describe deviation and attach evidence):
Yes

1.3.7

No

If YES, describe deviation


NA

Test Results:

Legend: BC=Break at Crimp, BO=Break Outside Crimp, FB=Fray Break, PO=Pull Out, NC=No Crimp, NA=Not Applicable
Group 1

Group 2

Group 3

Group 4

Sample

Lbf

Type

Sample

Lbf

Type

Sample

Lbf

Type

Sample

Lbf

Type

9.0

BC

12.1

BC

17.9

BC

18.5

BC

8.2

BC

13.6

BC

17.7

BC

18.4

BC

8.8

BC

12.6

BC

17.4

BO

18.3

BO

8.4

BC

12.4

BC

16.8

BC

18.3

BO

7.2

BC

13.0

BC

17.3

BC

18.4

BC

9.0

BC

13.0

BC

17.8

BC

18.5

BC

9.3

BC

12.9

BC

17.2

BC

18.7

BO

8.0

BC

14.0

BC

18.0

BC

18.8

BC

5.4

BC

11.1

BC

17.6

BC

18.6

BO

10

7.9

BC

10

13.5

BC

10

16.7

BC

10

17.7

BC

11

6.0

BC

11

11.1

BC

11

16.3

BO

11

18.9

BC

12

8.1

BC

12

14.7

BC

12

17.5

BC

12

18.9

BC

13

8.3

BC

13

13.7

BC

13

17.2

BC

13

19.3

BO

14

6.1

BC

14

13.0

BC

14

18.0

BO, FB

14

17.6

BO

15

5.8

BC

15

13.6

BC

15

16.5

BC

15

18.7

BO

16

8.7

BC

16

12.3

BC

16

16.9

BC

16

18.5

BO

17

8.5

BC

17

11.7

BC

17

17.3

BC

17

17.7

BO

18

6.8

BC

18

13.1

BC

18

17.4

BC

18

15.6

BO

19

8.1

BC

19

12.2

BC

19

15.0

BC

19

19.2

BO

20

6.3

BC

20

12.8

BC

20

16.8

BC

20

17.5

BO

21

7.6

BC

21

12.7

BC

21

18.0

BC

21

16.5

BC

22

9.5

BC

22

11.4

BC

22

17.8

BC

22

18.4

BC

23

8.6

BC

23

13.9

BC

23

18.0

BC

23

18.8

BC

24

8.3

BC

24

13.2

BC

24

17.5

BC

24

18.7

BO

25

8.1

BC

25

13.4

BC

25

16.8

BC

25

18.3

BC

26

5.8

BC

26

11.4

BC

26

17.1

BC

26

18.7

BC

27

8.3

BC

27

12.3

BC

27

17.5

BC

27

18.3

BC

28

7.9

BC

28

14.1

BC

28

16.9

BC

28

16.0

BO

29

9.0

BC

29

13.7

BC

29

17.1

BC

29

18.4

BC

30

8.5

BC

30

12.9

BC

30

17.5

BC

30

18.9

BC

FORM: EF 2.04.03-1 REV Page 10 of 14

Design Verification Test Report


Legend: BC=Break at Crimp, BO=Break Outside Crimp, FB=Fray Break, PO=Pull Out, NC=No Crimp, NA=Not Applicable
Group 5

Group 6

Group 7

Group 8

Sample

Lbf

Type

Sample

Lbf

Type

Sample

Lbf

Type

Sample

Lbf

Type

18.7

BO, FB

14.4

PO

0.0

PO

NA

NC

19.0

BO, FB

14.5

PO

0.0

PO

NA

NC

17.9

BO

14.6

PO

0.0

PO

NA

NA

17.2

BO

14.3

PO

0.0

PO

NA

NA

18.8

BO, FB

14.9

PO

0.0

PO

NA

NA

18.6

BO

15.0

PO

0.0

PO

NA

NA

18.1

BO

14.6

PO

0.0

PO

NA

NA

17.0

BO

15.0

PO

0.0

PO

NA

NA

17.3

BO

14.5

PO

0.0

PO

NA

NA

10

17.0

BO

10

14.9

PO

10

0.0

PO

10

NA

NA

11

18.6

BO, FB

11

14.8

PO

11

0.0

PO

11

NA

NA

12

19.0

BO, FB

12

14.8

PO

12

0.0

PO

12

NA

NA

13

18.1

BC

13

14.9

PO

13

0.0

PO

13

NA

NA

14

18.0

BC

14

14.5

PO

14

0.0

PO

14

NA

NA

15

19.8

BO, FB

15

14.8

PO

15

0.0

PO

15

NA

NA

16

17.7

BO

16

14.9

PO

16

0.0

PO

16

NA

NA

17

18.3

BC

17

14.5

PO

17

0.0

PO

17

NA

NA

18

18.8

BO

18

14.0

PO

18

0.0

PO

18

NA

NA

19

19.1

BO, FB

19

14.4

PO

19

0.0

PO

19

NA

NA

20

18.9

BO, FB

20

14.9

PO

20

0.0

PO

20

NA

NA

21

19.1

BO, FB

21

13.8

PO

21

0.0

PO

21

NA

NA

22

18.8

BO, FB

22

13.3

PO

22

0.0

PO

22

NA

NA

23

18.9

BO, FB

23

12.5

PO

23

0.0

PO

23

NA

NA

24

18.8

BO, FB

24

12.9

PO

24

0.0

PO

24

NA

NA

25

18.9

BO

25

15.1

PO

25

0.0

PO

25

NA

NA

26

19.0

BO

26

13.1

PO

26

0.0

PO

26

NA

NA

27

18.4

BO, FB

27

11.8

PO

27

0.0

PO

27

NA

NA

28

18.7

BO, FB

28

14.2

PO

28

0.0

PO

28

NA

NA

29

18.3

BO, FB

29

15.1

PO

29

0.0

PO

29

NA

NA

30

18.6

BO

30

12.7

PO

30

0.0

PO

30

NA

NA

Crimp Barrel View by Test Group (Tool Setting)

FORM: EF 2.04.03-1 REV Page 11 of 14

Design Verification Test Report

Group 1 Sample 7

Group 2 Sample 3

Group 3 Sample 2

Group 4 Sample 2

Group 5 Sample 13

Group 6 Sample 2

Crimp Capability by Test Group (Tool Setting)

FORM: EF 2.04.03-1 REV Page 12 of 14

Design Verification Test Report


Process Capability Report for Setting 1

Process Capability Report for Setting 2

LSL
Process Data
LSL
12
Target
*
USL
*
Sample Mean 7.85
Sample N
30
StDev(Overall) 1.14402
StDev(Within) 1.14637

LSL
Overall
Within
Overall Capability
Pp
*
PPL -1.21
PPU
*
Ppk -1.21
Cpm
*
Potential (Within) Capability
Cp
*
CPL -1.21
CPU
*
Cpk -1.21

10

11

Process Data
LSL
12
Target
*
USL
*
Sample Mean 12.8467
Sample N
30
StDev(Overall) 0.919045
StDev(Within) 1.02715

11

13

14

15

Process Capability Report for Setting 4

LSL

LSL

Process Data
LSL
12
Target
*
USL
*
Sample Mean 17.25
Sample N
30
StDev(Overall) 0.633409
StDev(Within) 0.574713

Observed
0.00
*
0.00

12

Performance
Observed Expected Overall Expected Within
PPM < LSL 166666.67
178460.96
204887.26
PPM > USL
*
*
*
PPM Total 166666.67
178460.96
204887.26

Process Capability Report for Setting 3

PPM < LSL


PPM > USL
PPM Total

Overall Capability
Pp
*
PPL 0.31
PPU
*
Ppk 0.31
Cpm
*
Potential (Within) Capability
Cp
*
CPL 0.27
CPU
*
Cpk 0.27

12

Performance
Observed Expected Overall Expected Within
PPM < LSL 1000000.00
999856.93
999852.77
PPM > USL
*
*
*
PPM Total 1000000.00
999856.93
999852.77

Overall
Within
Overall Capability
Pp
*
PPL 2.76
PPU
*
Ppk 2.76
Cpm
*
Potential (Within) Capability
Cp
*
CPL 3.05
CPU
*
Cpk 3.05

12.0

Overall
Within

13.2

14.4

15.6

Performance
Expected Overall Expected Within
0.00
0.00
*
*
0.00
0.00

FORM: EF 2.04.03-1 REV Page 13 of 14

16.8

Process Data
LSL
12
Target
*
USL
*
Sample Mean 18.2367
Sample N
30
StDev(Overall) 0.86761
StDev(Within) 0.745904

18.0

Overall
Within
Overall Capability
Pp
*
PPL 2.40
PPU
*
Ppk 2.40
Cpm
*
Potential (Within) Capability
Cp
*
CPL 2.79
CPU
*
Cpk 2.79

12.0

PPM < LSL


PPM > USL
PPM Total

Observed
0.00
*
0.00

13.5

15.0

16.5

Performance
Expected Overall Expected Within
0.00
0.00
*
*
0.00
0.00

18.0

19.5

Design Verification Test Report


Process Capability Report for Setting 5

Process Capability Report for Setting 6

LSL

LSL

Process Data
LSL
12
Target
*
USL
*
Sample Mean 18.4467
Sample N
30
StDev(Overall) 0.677589
StDev(Within) 0.522744

Overall
Within
Overall Capability
Pp
*
PPL 3.17
PPU
*
Ppk 3.17
Cpm
*
Potential (Within) Capability
Cp
*
CPL 4.11
CPU
*
Cpk 4.11

12.0

PPM < LSL


PPM > USL
PPM Total

Observed
0.00
*
0.00

Process Data
LSL
12
Target
*
USL
*
Sample Mean 14.2567
Sample N
30
StDev(Overall) 0.869278
StDev(Within) 0.602225

13.2

14.4

15.6

16.8

18.0

19.2

PPM < LSL


PPM > USL
PPM Total

All Criteria Pass

Overall Capability
Pp
*
PPL 0.87
PPU
*
Ppk 0.87
Cpm
*
Potential (Within) Capability
Cp
*
CPL 1.25
CPU
*
Cpk 1.25

12

Performance
Expected Overall Expected Within
0.00
0.00
*
*
0.00
0.00

1.3.8

Overall
Within

Observed
33333.33
*
33333.33

13

14

15

16

Performance
Expected Overall Expected Within
4715.46
89.41
*
*
4715.46
89.41

Summary / Conclusion:
All Criteria Fail

Partial Criteria Pass

Data Review Required?

Conclusions/Recommendations:
Pull test & visual inspection results indicate an over crimp condition exits when using tool settings (1 & 2) as the wire strands
for all samples were compressed or partially severed by the crimp and produced marginal or failing pull force results.
Pull test & visual inspection results indicate an under crimp condition exits when using tool settings (6, 7 & 8) as the wire
strands for all samples pulled out of the contact crimp barrel with little or no evidence of wire deformation producing marginal
or failing pull force results.
The remaining settings (3, 4 & 5) each produced acceptable results, both in terms of average pull force and an increase in wire
breaks outside of the crimp area, indicating the crimp strength exceeded the wire tensile strength.
However setting 5 produced the optimum results as evidenced by the greatest mean pull force and highest level of process
capability and is therefore recommended as the desired setting for use in further process validation testing.

DFMEA Update Required : (If NO, Justification Required)


Yes

No

Justification
Design change for process (crimp) improvement.

Customer Sign-off Required


Yes

No

Customer Signature ___________________________________________

FORM: EF 2.04.03-1 REV Page 14 of 14

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi