. .

- -
mazindhafer@yahoo.com

.

.

.


.
Abstract
The Globalization has emerged and developed over several decides. This ideology
which was set to constitutes the globe was not just to serve the world but to serve the entrusts
of its believers for control and dominance. Theyre for this ideology had to create anew
world system, capable of constant reformation and changing. This new ideology made tools
of technology, science, and economy as means have achieve its fundamental gals, no matter
how these means have deferred and contradicted towards achieving the gals, they will
seventhly serve the its main propose, which this comprehensive ideology seeks for. This
contempory ideology points its efforts and tools the weak parts of this world, where the real
meaning of system concept and its tools of implementing are unseen in the various fields
specifically in architect as such.
The contemporary Iraqi, and Arabic cites has been for a long period of time suffering
absence for a role of a comprehensive and integral urban system, cities suffer from enormous
urban problems mainly, because of the basic urban system itself and its tools of
implementation.
This research reveals the need and importance to rely upon an urban system, which
bears the real meaning of its name that is on both academic and implementation levels. This
should only be through comprehensive and not partial view, because partial problem dealing
will only give partial and temporary results, with the use of such comprehensive system and
implementational tools will consequently give out gains concerning identity, urban
personalization.
:


.
.
.
:

.
.

 :

.
:
,

.
)(
) ( .
)(1 :
)( .
) (1-1 -:
:

")1999.(7
) (2-1 -:
"
,
) 1997,.(11
) (3-1 -:
) (
, .
"
")..(741999,
)(4-1 :
) (1-4-1 -:
).
1999, .(61
).1999, .(20
).2000,.(3
)(
).1999, .(13
).1999,.(9
) (2-4-1 -:

)1997 .(43
)(
).1999.(20
) (3-4-1 -:
.
.
,
) .1999,.(132

. ).1999, .(165
). 1999,.(77

.
)(
.
) (2 -:

 -
.
- .
)" (2 -:
) (
-:
-: )(
. )
(
)1988Haider.(67


.
-:
.
) (
)1987Grube.(15
) (1-2 -:

.

) .1996.(36
) .1998.(1
) ( )(
) .1998 .(35

.
) ( .
)1999.(56

)1998 .(9
.
) .1999.(8
) (2-2 -:

)( "

.

)2001 .(94

).1997.(25

) .1997.(75
) (3-2 -:
, .
,
. .
)1999,.(11

 .
.
, .
,

.
) ( ,
,
,
.
.
) .1999,.(13
) (4-2 :

-:
) (1-4-2 -:

) ( .
.

.
) (Gelernter )(
) ( ,
.
.
1996,Gelernter)..(36


.
) 1982,Warren.(214
)( Traditional
-:
-: .
-: .
.
)1996, Gelernter.(45

. )( "
" "
)1989,.(169
) (2-4-2 -:
, -:
:
-

,
) ( , )(
. )(.
, , , , , ...
.

 :
-
, ,

.
:
-

.
:
-
,
,
.
.
) (3-4-2 -:
-:
) -: ( .
) -: (
.

.

) -:1989,.(171-169
-1 ) ( .
-2 ,
.
.

-3

-4 .

-5

(.
-6 .
)(3 :
-:
) (1-3 -:
.
.

) (
.

-:
-:
-: : .Deconstruc
)(New Revivalism
1988,Jenchs.12
-:
.
-
.
-
.
-
.
-
.
-

) .1992 ,.(42

) -:1998,.(196
:
-
.
-
:
.
: .
-
: .
-


. )
( -:
.Discontinuity
-
.Fragmentation
-
- .Transformation
-:
Disturbance
-
- Dislocation
- Deflection
Deviation
-
).Distortion1999.(38
-
) (2-3 -:
Metaphor
. )
( ,
-:
-:
-:
1981Schulz.42
-:
.Formal

. Intellectual

)( Intertextuality
.
.
.

) .1996,.(30


) (4 :

-:
)(1-4 -:


. .
.


-:
.

) (1-1-4 -:

-:
-: .
-: .
)( )( )(
) (
) .1999,.(128
,
.
. .


.

, .
) (.
)1999, .(6
.
) .1999,.(14
) (2-1-4 -:
,

) .1999,.(25
,
) .1999, .(44


)1997,.(15

.
)2000,.(142

-:
.
-

-
.

-

.

-
.
) (3-1-4 -:

 ) (
. .
-:
-: -:

.
.
.
-:
.
-
.
-
-: -:

.
) (
. ).
1997,.(16
) ( ) ( )
( )( .
) .1999, .(40 ) (
.
)1999, .(74 )( )
(
) .2000,.(18
) (4-1-4 -:
) .1999, .(20
.
)1999,(130
)(2-4 -:

:
-: -:
" ". "
" ) .1996,.(57
-: -:
.
.


) .1995,.(38
.
-: -:

.
) .2002,.(6
-: -:
.


. ) .1999,.(116
-: -:
-:

-

.

-
.

.
-: -:
. )(
-:
.
-

-

.
) (5 -:
) ( )( ) (
-:
-:
) . 2000, .(29 ) ( "
") .1999, .(124
"
.
) , , , ,
...., ( ).
)
1999,.(8
( ) .151997,( .
.
)1999,. (7
) .1999,.(127
-:
).1999, .(105

.
) .1999,.(106
) (1-5 -:
)( "
)2000, .(17


).2000,.(18
)( "
" . .

. .
)2001,.(138
) (2-5 -:

 ,
) ( ,
) -:1999,.(120
-
.
.
-
)(
) ( ) . 1999, .(120
)( ,
)( )( .
. )(
)( . )(
-:
-: -:
) , ,...(
. .
)(
.
)1999,.(135
-: -:



.
)2001,.(16 )(
) (
) (


) .2001,.(98
-: -:
) , , , , ,... ,(

.
) .2001,.(13

. ) ( ,
,
) .1999,.(117

,
) ( " ".
)2001, .(139 , )(
" .
) ( .
)2001,.(145
)(3-5 :
.
.

. .
.

 "
") ( ] : : [ The West :Unique Not
Universal " " Modernization " " Westernization ":

. .
.
. . " . ":
.

. ) (


) .2005,.(58




.

)2005,.(60



)2005,(60

)2005,(59

) (4-5 :




.

:

1
2
3
4

1
.



) (.
)(
.
) (
.
:
-1
.
-2 .
-3
.
-4
)2005,61.(62

)) 1

%80 ((.


)2005,(63
:
-1 ) ...(
.
-2 .
-3
.
-4
.
-5
.
-6 .
-7 .
-8 .
-9
.
-10
.
-11
.
-12 .
:
-1
.
-2 .
-3 .
-4 .
-5
.
-6
.
-7
.

 -8
.
-9
.
:
-1 .) ( 1999
-2 ) (
.1996
-3 . ) ( -
251 .2000
-4) ( .1999
-5 ) (
: .1999
-6 ) (
- .2000
-7 ) ( -
.1997
-8 ) (
.1992
-9 . )
( .1999
-10 ) (
46 . 1999
-11 ) (
.199924

-12 ) (
- .1998
-13 ) (
.1997
-14 . ) (
263 .2001
-15 ) (
32 .2001
-16 . ) ( 10
. 1999
-17 ) (
.1999
-18 ) (
.1997
-19 ) ( -
.1999
-20 .) (
23 .1999
-21 . ) (
.1999
-22 ) (
- .1997
-23 ) (
248.1999
-24 .) (

 .2000
-25 ) ( . 1999
-26 ) ( . -
.1995
-27 . ) (
.1999
-28 . ) (
1999
-29 . ) (
16 -14 .1989
-30 ) (
.1997
-31 . ) ( - .1996
-32 . ) (
179 .2000
-33 ) ( -
.1999
-34 ) ( -
.1996
-35 ) ( 1998
-36 ) (
- .1998
-37 .) ( ) (
15 .2000
-38 ) (
263 .2001
-39 ) (
1999
-40 ) ( -
.1999
-41 . ) (
. 1999
-42 ) ( .2001
] [ 1996
-43
-44 . ) ( 1997
-45 ,. ), (
, , 2005.
:
1-Haider,S.Gulzar," Islam Cosmology", Architecture A symposium held by the
Tgakhan,1988.
2-Jencks,Charles," Architecture Today", Academy Editions,London,1988
3-Gelernter,Mark," Sources of Architectural Forms", A critical history of western design
theory,1996.
4-Grube, Ernest," What is Islamic Architecture", Architecture of the Islamic word ,Lts.
History & social meaning, Thomas & Hudson,1987.
5-Warrn,John & Fathi,Ihsan," Traditional Houses In Baghdad ",The coat publication house
limited Horsham,England,1982.
6-Schulz,Christion Norberg," Intention In Architecture " ,M.I.T., Press ,Cambridge
,Massachusetts , U.S.A., 1981.