Netflix, Inc. v. Blockbuster, Inc. Doc.

204
Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA Document 204 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 1 of 2

1 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP

JEFFREY R. CHANIN - #103649
2 DARALYN J. DURIE - #169825
ASHOK RAMANI - #200020
3 710 Sansome Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-1704
4 Telephone: (415) 391-5400
Facsimile: (415) 397-7188
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff
6 NETFLIX, INC.

7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9

10
NETFLIX, INC., a Delaware corporation, Case No. C 06 2361 WHA (JCS)
11
Plaintiff, NETFLIX’S RESPONSE TO THE
12 COURT’S MAY 1, 2007 ORDER
v.
13
BLOCKBUSTER, INC., a Delaware Complaint filed: April 4, 2006
14 corporation, DOES 1-50,

15 Defendant.

16
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS
17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

394919.01 NETFLIX’S RESPONSE TO THE COURT’S MAY 1, 2007 ORDER

CASE NO. C 06 2361 WHA (JCS)
Dockets.Justia.com
 Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA Document 204 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 2 of 2

1 Netflix respectfully submits this response to the Court’s May 1, 2007 Order requesting

2 input on page limits for summary judgment motions: Netflix has no objection to the proposed

3 limitations set forth in the Court’s May 1, 2007 Order.

5 Dated: May 7, 2007 Respectfully submitted,

6 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP

8
By: _____/s/ Eugene M. Paige___________
9 Eugene M. Paige
Attorneys for Plaintiff
10 NETFLIX, INC.
11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1
394919.01 NETFLIX’S RESPONSE TO THE COURT’S MAY 1, 2007 ORDER
CASE NO. C 06 2361 WHA (JCS)