Shloss v. Sweeney et al Doc.

93

1
2
3
4
5
6
7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9 SAN JOSE DIVISION
10 Carol Shloss, NO. C 06-03718 JW
11 Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING HEARING
United States District Court

v.
For the Northern District of California

12
Seán Sweeney, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14 /
15 The Court finds Plaintiff’s Motion for Judicial Clarification (docket item no. 87) appropriate
16 for submission without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Accordingly, the Court VACATES the
17 hearing presently scheduled for December 10, 2007.
18
19 Dated: December 5, 2007
JAMES WARE
20 United States District Judge
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dockets.Justia.com
 1 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO:
2 Anthony T. Falzone anthony.falzone@stanford.edu
Bernard A. Burk bburk@howardrice.com
3 David S. Olson dolson@law.stanford.edu
Dorothy Rebecca McLaughlin dmclaughlin@kvn.com
4 Jennifer Stisa Granick JENNIFER@LAW.STANFORD.EDU
Maria K. Nelson mknelson@jonesday.com
5 Mark A. Lemley mlemley@kvn.com
Matthew Mickle Werdegar mmw@kvn.com
6
7 Dated: December 5, 2007 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
8
By: /s/ JW Chambers
9 Elizabeth Garcia
Courtroom Deputy
10
11
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28