Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Gallaudet University
!2
!3
principles which led to political tension, and influenced the course of development work.
According to Black (2007) US President Truman had a different agenda with regards to
development. He stressed the importance of the advancement of poor countries using democratic
principles, for the purposes of combating communism and protecting the political interests of the
USA and its allies. Therefore, the concept of development has ideological connotations.
In the 1960s, the UNs Decade of Development was launched (Black, 2007). Every
industrialized country was required by the UN to contribute one percent of their Gross National
Product (GNP) to Official Development Assistance (ODA), which was used as aid to support
underdeveloped economies. US President Kennedy followed up on several initiatives which
included the Peace Corps, Food for Peace and the Alliance for Progress. The media was
increasingly used to promote images of suffering around the world. The UNs Food and
Agriculture Organization launched the Freedom from Hunger campaign which moved people to
compassion in the West (Black, 2007). This led to other non-profit organizations such as Oxfam
International being established. The US Agency for International Development also came about
to provide aid to foreign countries to foster social and economic development (USAID, 2015).
In 2000, the eight Millenium Development Goals (MDGs) were implemented. Countries
committed to halving extreme poverty and addressing other needs such as curbing the spread of
HIV/AIDS by 2015 (United Nations, 2015). In the same year, there was a new wave of
philanthropy headed by Bill Gates which saw the creation of the Bill and Melinda Gates
Foundation (2015). The organization introduced several initiatives in global health, global
development, policy and advocacy, US education programs, and also allocates grants to
international non-profit organizations. Presently, the UN acts on issues such as peace and
!4
security, sustainable development, climate change, terrorism, human rights, disarmament, gender
equality and more (United Nations, 2015). It is evident that development assistance from the
Northern countries changes according to global issues that arise such as terrorism.
Colonialism and its Impact on Development
Colonialism has influenced the nature of development work and is responsible for the
state that developing countries are in, to a large extent. It accounts for why some countries are
developed while others remain underdeveloped. Graham (2015) stated in A review of William
Easterlys The Tyranny of Experts: Economists, Dictators and the Forgotten Rights of the Poor,
that the tyranny of experts is referred to as the development community in the international
financial institutions, the policy arena, and D.C. think tanks (p. 93). It is evident that those who
wield power and are involved in decision-making in development are the colonialists. This has
negative repercussions on development work because decisions that are made often serve the
interests of the colonialists instead of the recipient country. Development work has political
aspects to it as most of the funding of development projects come from the U.S. government (K.
Giddens, personal communication, March 10, 2015). This means that the way that the funds are
allocated is often subject to the interest of the U.S. government.
Black (2007) highlighted that it has been approximately 60 years since development work
came about to assist backward countries in catching up with developed nations. Instead of
achieving its desired result, the irony is that the numbers of people in poverty have increased.
Thus, development work has caused more harm than good. Diamond (2005) revealed in his
documentary Guns, Germs and Steel that the colonization of Africa has created modern high
density, cities and towns where many Africans have moved to, from their small communities.
!5
This has created countries in Africa where the spread of diseases is rampant. Furthermore, the
International Monetary Fund (IMF) compounded Jamaicas development problems during the
1970s and 1980s by imposing conditions such as restricting the way funds could be allocated to
programs and making Jamaica accept imports from America that were sold at a cheaper price
(Black, 2001). This affected the local market adversely as people could not sell their products.
Collier (2007) pointed out that some regard aid as a form of reparations for colonialism in order
to resolve the guilt of Western society, instead of about development. Maathai (2009) asserted
that the colonial governments had deliberately restricted the education of Africans and barred
them access to the professional classes so as to prevent them from threatening their positions of
power. They also ensured that the new people in power did not possess the ability to lead on their
own. This maintained Africas dependency on the colonialists. Consequently, when the
colonialists withdrew, there were very few qualified Africans capable of leading the country.
Colonialism and development are clearly intertwined. Colonialism has hindered
development instead of fostering it because the rights of the recipients of development are often
exploited. The interests of the colonialists are being propagated in development work and power
is concentrated in the hands of international organizations to a large degree. It can be inferred
that the term development is often misused by those with covert political agendas.
The Aid Debate and Solutions for Improvement in Development
There are two diverging perspectives in the aid debate. Raster (1990) and Hayer (1971)
stated that foreign assistance is either viewed as the external intervention by richer nations to
serve as a catalyst for economic success for developing countries, or as imperialism in disguise
!6
(as cited in Andrews, 2009). Sach (2005) purported that foreign aid is necessary to spur
economic development. However, outcomes of foreign aid seem to suggest otherwise.
Aid does hasten the growth process and has prevented the countries of the bottom billion
from falling apart (Collier, 2007). However, aid on its own, is highly unlikely to be able to
address the issues of poverty. Mathaai (2009) indicated that frequently the recipients of
development assistance fail to understand the intrinsic value of what they have been given. As a
result, when donors and development assistance come to a halt, the individuals return to their
original state of poverty and passivity. They do not take the initiative to address problems within
their community such as repairing taps, which development assistance has previously focused
on. Hence, development assistance has perpetuated the cycle of dependency on foreign aid with
nobody assuming responsibility or accountability for the ongoing development of the community
(Maathai, 2009). This has impaired the capacity of the African people to develop solutions to
solve the multitude of problems they face.
Sach (2014) mentioned that Easterly, a long-standing opponent of aid, theorized that
large-scale aid projects would inevitably fail, and recently made the declaration that the aid
debate was over. Easterly (2013) is highly critical of Sachs ideas on how to end poverty. Sach
purported that having adequate money could simply solve the issues of those mired in poverty by
paying for the technical solutions to their problems. This involved provision of bed nets to
prevent the spread of malaria from mosquito bites, constructing wells to supply clean water,
building hospitals to treat ailments, and increasing the yield of food crops by using fertilizers.
Easterly asserted that the problem goes deeper than that and that it was important to dig beneath
the surface. Glennie (2011) highlighted that giving aid is not actually an act of generosity but
!7
instead used to support the political and economic interests of donors. He stated that it is
important for rich nations to restructure the way they handled development assistance instead of
just rendering aid. This can be achieved by establishing fair trade rules, making quick
adaptations to climate change, and addressing problems of resource scarcity by placing limits on
consumption, and introducing other reformations that will not disadvantage recipient countries.
If such restructuring is achieved, development work will reap more positive results.
Birdsall (2005) also discussed the problems with donors by highlighting their seven
deadly sins. She implied that people who are for development assistance tend to lose sight of the
big picture and focus on advancing their own interests instead. When listing the seven deadly
sins she pointed out that donors are impatient where institution building is concerned, are
envious of other donors projects and accomplishments, ignorant of their own failures, are unable
to exit a program due to pride even when it is appropriate to do so, display sloth by pretending
participation is adequate for ownership, are greedy by allowing unreliable and miserly transfers,
and show foolishness by mismanaging funds for global and regional public goods such as
vaccines. Birdsall (2005) then suggested solutions to these issues. She is not against development
assistance but indicates that those providing development assistance need to firstly recognize
how important the challenge is and to fix those issues, take efforts to address them, and be
tenacious in implementing a new approach to development assistance.
While it appears that development has been unsuccessful to a large extent, there are
development projects that have been successful. Development projects that responds to the needs
and the culture of the local people and are focused on equipping them with skills to carry out
their work independently have yielded positive results (Krishna, Uphoff & Esman, 1997). This is
!8
evident in the agriculture program established in the San Martin area in Guatemala for the Indian
farmers, which adopted best agricultural practices that ensured the sustainability of the program.
The program focused on getting the villagers to make the changes to their agricultural practices
themselves by teaching them techniques and ideas they could easily implement with the
equipment they owned or could afford. In this case, development work was contextualized which
caused major increases in crop yields and fostered a sense of partnership in the community as the
local people were directly involved in the planning and implementing of the project.
Development assistance has clearly hindered economic development to a large extent and
it has created a culture of dependency and even greater poverty especially when foreign
development workers take on all the responsibility. The more foreign intervention a country
receives, the further it sinks into poverty because the local people do not learn how to help
themselves. However, development work when focused on training and equipping people with
the skills to implement projects independently, are successful.
Personal Thoughts on how Development can be Successful
Smith (2005) states that problems surrounding illiteracy can be subtle, and devising
solutions to them is no easy feat. Millions of people in Asia, African and Latin American
converse only in indigenous and tribal languages that are very contrasting to the dominant
language. This makes it difficult to acquire literacy. Imagine what the world would be like if
every individual had full access to an education in their mother tongue. People would develop a
sense of confidence and pride in their cultural identities and communities. What would it also
look like if every single person had English as a second and shared language? Not just one
standard form of English per se, but their cultural version of English? Just like American and
!9
British English differ, there is also Konglish in Korea, Singlish in Singapore, and so on. People
would be able to educate and inform other ethnic groups and nationalities about the beliefs,
values, norms and worldview of their cultures. There would be intercultural understanding, racial
harmony and equality among various people groups.
Skutnabb-Kangas (2001) highlights that language is rooted in ones identity and for most
minority groups, ethnic conflicts arise due to their identities being threatened by not being
granted language rights. Issues of power and dynamics of oppression are perpetuated. Thus, the
solution to preventing or reducing conflict is allowing minority groups their rights to language
and education. Therefore, it is essential for language rights all over the world to be established
and protected. Schools that deliver and teach content in the native language of local communities
need to be built. English should be taught in all schools as a second language by local teachers
and used as a tool for empowerment and bridging communication across various cultures
(Giddens, personal communication, March 10, 2015). Teachers need to be trained to impart
curriculum in their mother tongue as well as in English. When all children and adults have a
strong sense of cultural identity and the skills for intercultural communication, they will not view
other cultures as superior or inferior to them. This is the starting point, for how development can
be done successfully as issues of racial equality, power dynamics and oppression caused by
colonialism, would be addressed. Ethnic minorities and other people groups would not look to
the West as the experts and the West would not think of themselves as better than those in the
Global South. This would level the playing field among professionals in the field of international
development worldwide. Leaders and advocates in their local communities would also feel
empowered to make their own decisions, ones that would best benefit and promote development
!10
!11
counseling and testing services for deaf people, and educational materials were not converted to
Braille for people with limited vision. There is also a general lack of awareness in the public
about the needs of PWDs (Vanter, Savill, Rickert, Bogopane, Venkatesh, Camba, Mulikita,
Khaula, Stone & Maunder, n.d.). A person with a vision impairment in India reported that
passer-bys clutched his shirt collar or sleeves when he requested for assistance to cross the road.
This made him feel insignificant and inferior.
According to the World Health Organization (2011), the needs of PWDs in the past have
been catered to in the form of segregated settings such as special schools and residential
institutions. Prior to the 1970s, there was a lack of organization of Disabled Peoples
Organizations (DPOs) and disability was not regarded as a human rights issue. Furthermore,
PWDs have often not been directly consulted with on projects designed for them. Wilson (2005)
found that the Jamaican Deaf Community was frequently excluded from the planning, designing
and evaluating stages of development programs and the American assistance they received did
not best meet their needs. A view of charity is adopted when providing assistance to Deaf
people and PWDs, instead of empowering them to devise their own solutions. Lastly, legislation
in certain countries have failed to protect the rights of PWDs (Independent Living Institute, n.d.).
Effective Approaches for the Inclusion of PWDs in Development Assistance
Training international development workers in disability awareness and inclusion,
employing PWDs to work on development projects and in international organizations, and
removing barriers in the environment by making specific adaptations, are effective approaches
for the inclusion of PWDs in development assistance.
!12
!13
!14
References
Andrews, N. (2009). Foreign aid and development in Africa: What the literature says and what
the reality is. Journal of African Studies and Development, 1(1), 8-15.
Baker, A. (2014). Shaping the developing world: The west, the south, and the natural world.
London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. (2015). What we do. Retrieved from http://
www.gatesfoundation. org/What-We-Do
Birdsall, N. (2005). Seven deadly sins: Reflections on donor failings. Center for Global
Development, 50, 1-37.
Black, M. (2007). The no-nonsense guide to international development. Oxford: New
Internationalist Publications Ltd.
Collier, P. (2007). The bottom billion: Why the poorest countries are failing and what can be
done about it. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.
Black, S (Producer). (2001). Life and debt [DVD]. United States: New Yorker Films
CBM. (2010). About CBM. Retrieved from http://www.cbm.org/About-CBM-250648.php
Diamond, J. M. (Producer). (2005). Guns, germs and steel [DVD]. United States: National
Geographic.
Easterly, W. (2013). The big aid debate is over. Retrieved from http://reason.com/archives/
2013/10/ 04/the-big-aid-debate-is-over
Gallaudet University. (2014). Fast facts 2015. Retrieved from http://www.gallaudet.edu/about_
gallaudet/fast_facts.html
!15
Gilkey, A. (Producer), & Neudel, N. (Director). (2011). Lives worth living: The great fight for
disability rights. MA: Storyline Motion Pictures, LLC.
Glennie, J. (2011). Giving aid to poor countries is hardly a great act of generosity. Retrieved
from http://www.theguardian.com/global-development/poverty-matters/2011/jun/14/aidis-hardly-an-act-of-great-generosity-effectiveness
Graham, C. (2015). A review of william easterlys the tyranny of experts: Economists, dictators
and the forgotten rights of the poor. Journal of Economic Literature, 53(1), 92-101.
Houge, S. (2015). Introduction - class 1 [Powerpoint slides]. Retrieved from https://
my.gallaudet.edu/
Human Rights Watch. (2013, October 13). Signs for a good education [video file]. Retrieved
from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwksMw6Ar_s
Independent Living Institute. (n.d.). Integrated national disability strategy: Prevalence of
disability in South Africa. Retrieved from http://www.independentliving.org/docs5/
SANatlDisStrat1.html
International Monetary Fund. (n.d.). About the IMF. Retrieved from http://www.imf.org/external/
about.htm
Koninklijke Kentalis. (2014, September 1). Portrait deaf role models: Monicah. Teacher [video
file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTyRXsSI9_g
Krishna, A., Uphoff, N., & Esman, M. J. (Eds.). (1997). Reasons for hope: Instructive
experiences in rural development. Connecticut: Kumarian Press, Inc.
Little Rock Kenya. (2015). Little rock ECD. Retrieved from http://www.littlerockkenya.org/
Maathai, W. (2009). The challenge for Africa. New York: Random House, Inc.
!16
Pearce, E. (2014). Disability inclusion: Translating policy into practice in humanitarian action.
New York: Womens Refugee Commission
Roland, G. (2014). Development economics. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
Sach, J. (2014). The case for aid. Retrieved from http://foreignpolicy.com/2014/01/21/ the-casefor-aid/
Sach, J. D. (2005). The end of poverty: Economic possibilities for our time. New York: Penguin
Group, Inc.
Sanson, J., & Felix, M. (2013). Disability, poverty and livelihoods: Guidance from trickle up.
New York: Trickle Up.
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (2001). The globalisation of (educational) language rights. International
Review of Education, 47(3-4), 201-219.
Smith, S. C. (2005). Ending global poverty: A guide to what works.New York: Palgrave
Macmillan.
The World Bank Group. (2015). What we do. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org/en/
about/ what-we-do
United Nations. (2015). Overview. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/en/sections/about-un/
overview/index.html
USAID. (2015). USAID history. Retrieved from http://www.usaid.gov/who-we-are/usaid-history
Vanter, C., Savill, T., Rickert, T., Bogopane, H., Venkatesh, A., Camba, J., Mulikita, N., Khaula,
C., Stone, J., & Maunder, D. (n.d.). Enhanced accessibility for people with disabilities
living in urban areas. Retrieved from http://www.globalride-sf.org/images/DFID.pdf
!17