Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
**
College
of
Wooster,
Cleveland
Clinic
Disclosures
Don
Goldberg:
Immediate
Past
President
of
the
Alexander
Graham
Bell
AssociaSon
for
the
Deaf
and
Hard
of
Hearing
Ted
Meyer:
President-Elect
AG
Bell
Hearing and
Hearing
Technology 12%
History, Education 6%
Philosophy, and
Professional
Issues 4%
Strategies for
Listening and
Spoken
Language
Development
18%
Parent Guidance,
Education and
Support 13%
Auditory
Functioning 16%
Child
Development 9%
Spoken
Language
Communication
16%
37.7%
Speech-Language
Pathologist
Audiologist
43.2%
Educator
of
the
Deaf
12.2%
School
Adminstrator
*
Out
of
547
Certied
LSLS;
some
of
our
professionals
ll
more
than
one
role
Importance
of
LSLS
Communication
Outcomes
Selected
by
Families
6%
4% 1%
Total
Communication
American
Sign
Language
89%
Cued Speech
Source: BEGINNINGS of North Carolina is a non-profit agency providing an impartial approach to meeting the diverse needs of
families with children who are deaf or hard of hearing and the professionals who serve them
Importance of LSLS
Prelingual (0-2)
PrevocaSonal (3-17)
Lost ProducSvity
$433,400 (42%)
$444,300 (48%)
Special EducaSon
$504,900 (50%)
$401,000 (44%)
$12,600 (1%)
AssisSve
Devices,
$70,200
(7%)
medical
costs
and
others
$61,100 (7%)
Total
$1,020,000
$919,000
$464,000 - $1,733,000
$401,000 - $1,623,000
Mohr
PE,
F.
J.,
Dunbar
JL,
McConkey-Robbins
A,
Niparko
JK,
Ri?enhouse
RK
and
Skinner
M
(2000).
"The
Societal
Costs
of
Severe
to
Profound
Hearing
Loss
in
the
United
States."
InternaPonal
Journal
of
Technology
Assessment
in
Health
Care
16(4):
1120-1135.
Importance
of
LSLS
Education
is
expensive
better
technology,
better
rehabilitation,
Earlier
identication
means
Earlier
Intervention
Will
hopefully
lead
to
less
lost
revenue
and
more
opportunities
for
children
with
hearing
loss
as
adults
And
a
cost
savings
in
the
long
run
Methods
Databases
reviewed
for
demographic
informaSon
for
new
born
screening,
prevalence
of
hearing
impairment:
CDC-Early
Hearing
DetecSon
and
IntervenSon
databases
NaSonal
Health
and
NutriSon
ExaminaSon
Surveys
NaSonal
Health
Interview
Surveys
Gallaudet
University
Database
DEMOGRAPHICS
OF
CHILDREN
WITH
IMPAIRED
HEARING
UP
TO
2012
(2013
WAS
STILL
BEING
PROCESSED)
Methods
AG
Bell
academy
database
was
reviewed
for
the
number
of
LSLS
The
incidence
staSsScs
were
used
as
surrogates
to
esSmate:
PopulaSon
of
preschool
children
and
schoola
ge
children
needing
LSLS
Need
for
LSLS
per
state
for
this
populaSon
Results
2012
NaSonal
Early
Hearing
and
DetecSon
Survey
PUBLISHED
September
2014:
3.8
million
children
screened
(96.6%)
6000
screened
had
HEARING
LOSS
(1.6/1000)
87.6%
OF
HEARING
IMPAIRED
Children
are
referred
to
Part
C
EI
Only
83.1%
were
eligible
(STATE
DEFINITIONS
OF
DEVELOPMENTAL
DELAY)
LSLS
516
501
467
USA
448
437
379
717
678
640
WORLDWIDE
621
598
557
100
200
2014
300
2013
400
2012
2011
500
2010
2009
600
700
800
2014
StaSsScs
NaSonal
1
LSLs
per
228
children
with
hearing
loss
<17
States
range
from
0
LSLs
to
1
LSLs
per
about
1781
children
<
17
(Louisiana)
Missouri
has
the
lowest
raSo
1/53
States
with
large
populaSons
have
more
LSLs
than
states
with
small
populaSons:
Not
always
the
case
StaSsScs
US
State
Number
of
GDP
per
2013
children
<17
capita
LSLS
2014
PopulaPon
with
hearing
rank
loss
Number
of
children
with
hearing
loss
per
LSL
South
Carolina
4,774,839
49
1727
11
157
Tennessee 6,495,978
38
2386
298
District
of
Columbia
646,449
178
Missouri
6,044,171
35
2236
42
53
Conclusions
Growth
of
LSLS
numbers
over
the
past
5
years:
Slow?
Steady?Adequate?
Unequal
distribuSon
between
states
unequal
distribuSon
within
counSes
of
a
state
References
Eriks-Brophy
A
(2004).
"Outcomes
of
auditory-verbal
therapy:
A
review
of
the
evidence
and
a
call
for
acSon."
The
Volta
Review
104(1):
21-36.
Baldassari,
C.
M.,
et
al.
(2009).
"RecepSve
language
outcomes
in
children
aoer
cochlear
implantaSon."
Otolaryngol
Head
Neck
Surg
140(1):
114-119.
Connor,
C.
M.,
et
al.
(2000).
"Speech,
vocabulary,
and
the
educaSon
of
children
using
cochlear
implants:
oral
or
total
communicaSon?"
J
Speech
Lang
Hear
Res
43(5):
1185-1204.
Dornan
D,
H.
L.,
Murdoch
B
and
Houston
T
(2007).
"Outcomes
of
an
Auditory-Verbal
Program
for
Children
with
Hearing
Loss:
A
ComparaSve
Study
with
a
Matched
Group
of
Children
with
Normal
Hearing."
Volta
Review
107:
37-54
Dornan
D,
H.
L.,
Murdoch
B
and
Houston
T
(2008).
"Speech
and
language
outcomes
for
children
with
hearing
loss
educated
in
auditory-verbal
programs:
A
review
of
the
evidence."
CommunicaSve
Disorders
Review
2:
157-172.
References
Dornan
D,
H.
L.,
Murdoch
B
and
Houston
T
(2009).
"Longitudinal
study
of
Speech
PercepSon
and
language
for
children
with
hearing
loss
in
auditory-verbal
programs."
Volta
Review
109:
61-86.
Rhoades
EA,(2001).
"Language
progress
with
an
auditory-verbal
approach
for
young
children
with
hearing
loss."
InternaSonal
Pediatrics
16(1):
41-47.
Rhoades
EA,
(2006).
"Research
outcomes
of
auditory-verbal
intervenSon:
is
the
approach
jusSed?
."
Deafness
&
EducaSon
InternaSonal
8(3):
125-143.
Easterbrooks
SR,
O.
R.
C.,
Todd
NW
(2000).
"Child
and
family
factors
associated
with
deaf
childrens
success
in
auditory-verbal
therapy."
Am
J
Otol
21:
341-344.
Estabrooks,
W.
I.
(2000).
Auditory-Verbal
PracSce.
Cochlear
Implants.
N.
C.
Susan
Waltzman.
New
York,
NY,
Thieme
Medical
Publishers:
225-256.
References
Feldman,
H.
M.
(2007).
"Using
the
language
characterisScs
of
clinical
populaSons
to
understand
normal
language
development."
Pediatr
Clin
North
Am
54(3):
585-607
Fitzpatrick
E,
R.
E.,
Dornan
D,
Thomas
E
and
Goldberg
DM
(2012).
What
are
some
of
the
evidence-based
outcomes
of
auditory-verbal
pracSce
101
Frequently
Asked
QuesSons
about
Auditory-Verbal
PracSce.
W.
Estabrooks,
Alexander
Graham
Bell
AssociaSon
for
the
Deaf
and
Hard
of
Hearing:
419-436.
Ganek,
H.,
et
al.
(2012).
"Language
outcomes
aoer
cochlear
implantaSon."
Otolaryngol
Clin
North
Am
45(1):
173-185.
References
Geers,
A.
E.,
et
al.
(2000).
"Eects
of
communicaSon
mode
on
skills
of
long-term
cochlear
implant
users."
Ann
Otol
Rhinol
Laryngol
Suppl
185:
89-92.
Greers
AE,
M.
J.,
Biedenstein
J,
et
al.
(2009).
"Spoken
language
scores
of
children
using
cochlear
implants
compared
to
hearing
age-mates
at
school
entry."
J
Deaf
Stud
Dead
Educ
14(3):
371-385.
Hickson
L
Thy
BS,
A.
M.,
Murdoch
B,
ConstanSnescu
G
and
Path
BS
(2010).
"Is
auditory-verbal
therapy
eecSve
for
children
with
hearing
loss?"
The
Volta
Review
110(3):
361-387.
Horn,
R.
M.,
et
al.
(1991).
"Audiological
and
medical
consideraSons
for
children
with
cochlear
implants."
Am
Ann
Deaf
136(2):
82-86.
Lim
S,
S.
J.
(2005).
"Auditory-Verbal
Therapy
for
children
with
hearing
impairment."
Ann
Acad
Med
Singapore
34:
307-312.
References
Ling,
D.,
Novelli-Olmsted
T,
Rouleisch
S
and
Simser
J
The
unique
principles
of
Auditory-Verbal
PracSce.
Meyer,
T.
A.,
et
al.
(1998).
"Improvements
in
speech
percepSon
by
children
with
profound
prelingual
hearing
loss:
eects
of
device,
communicaSon
mode,
and
chronological
age."
J
Speech
Lang
Hear
Res
41(4):
846-858.
Mitchell
RE,
Y.
T.,
Bachleda
B,
Karchmer
MA
(2006).
"How
Many
People
Use
ASL
in
the
United
States?
Why
EsSmates
Need
UpdaSng."
Sign
Language
Studies
6(3):
306-335.
Miyamoto,
R.
T.,
et
al.
(1994).
"Variables
aecSng
implant
performance
in
children."
Laryngoscope
104(9):
1120-1124.
Moog,
J.
S.
and
A.
E.
Geers
(2010).
"Early
educaSonal
placement
and
later
language
outcomes
for
children
with
cochlear
implants."
Otol
Neurotol
31(8):
1315-1319.
References
Nicholas,
J.
G.
and
A.
E.
Geers
(2006).
"Eects
of
early
auditory
experience
on
the
spoken
language
of
deaf
children
at
3
years
of
age."
Ear
Hear
27(3):
286-298.
O'Donoghue,
G.
M.,
et
al.
(2000).
"Determinants
of
speech
percepSon
in
children
aoer
cochlear
implantaSon."
Lancet
356(9228):
466-468.
O'Neill,
C.,
et
al.
(2002).
"VariaSons
in
gains
in
auditory
performance
from
pediatric
cochlear
implantaSon."
Otol
Neurotol
23(1):
44-48.
Osberger,
M.
J.,
et
al.
(2002).
"Cochlear
implant
candidacy
and
performance
trends
in
children."
Ann
Otol
Rhinol
Laryngol
Suppl
189:
62-65.
References
Mitchell
RE,
(2006).
"How
Many
Deaf
People
Are
There
in
the
United
States?
EsSmates
From
the
Survey
of
Income
and
Program
ParScipaSon."
J.
Deaf
Stud.
Deaf
Educ.
11(1):
112-119.
Mohr
PE,
F.
J.,
Dunbar
JL,
McConkey-Robbins
A,
Niparko
JK,
Riwenhouse
RK
and
Skinner
M
(2000).
"The
Societal
Costs
of
Severe
to
Profound
Hearing
Loss
in
the
United
States."
InternaSonal
Journal
of
Technology
Assessment
in
Health
Care
16(4):
1120-1135.
Semenov,
Y.
R.,
et
al.
(2012).
"Cochlear
implants:
clinical
and
societal
outcomes."
Otolaryngol
Clin
North
Am
45(5):
959-981.
Soman,
U.
G.,
et
al.
(2012).
"RehabilitaSon
and
educaSonal
consideraSons
for
children
with
cochlear
implants."
Otolaryngol
Clin
North
Am
45(1):
141-153.
Waltzman,
S.
B.,
et
al.
(1994).
"Long-term
results
of
early
cochlear
implantaSon
in
congenitally
and
prelingually
deafened
children."
Am
J
Otol
15
Suppl
2:
9-13.
References
Wu,
C.-J.
D.,
Brown,
P.Margaret
(2004).
"Parents'
and
Teachers'
ExpectaSons
of
Auditory-Verbal
Therapy."
The
Volta
Review
104(1):
5-20.
Yanbay,
E.,
et
al.
(2014).
"Language
outcomes
for
children
with
cochlear
implants
enrolled
in
dierent
communicaSon
programs."
Cochlear
Implants
Int
15(3):
121-135.