Mid-Term Evaluation by University Director of Student Teaching: Site 2 (rev.

2011)

#47

COMPLETE
Collector: New Link (Web Link)
Started: Monday, March 30, 2015 7:49:53 AM
Last Modified: Wednesday, April 01, 2015 4:54:05 PM
Time Spent: Over a day
IP Address: 108.11.182.216

PAGE 1: Personal Information

Q1: Teacher Candidate's Name

Victoria Edwards

Q2: Internship Start Date

March 2, 2015

Q3: Internship End Date

April 24, 2015

Q4: School

Cedar Road Elementary School

Q5: District

Chesapeake Public Schools

Q6: State

Virginia

Q7: Evaluator's Name

Dr. Cheryl A. Gould

Q8: Evaluator's Position

Director of Student Teaching

PAGE 2: Instructional Planning/Delivery: Active, Successful Student Participation

1/4

SurveyMonkey

Mid-Term Evaluation by University Director of Student Teaching: Site 2 (rev.

2011)

SurveyMonkey

Q9: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas
below.
Students are actively engaged in learning.

Satisfactory

Students are successful in learning.

Satisfactory

Students behaviors indicate learning is at a high

cognitive level.

Satisfactory

Students are self-directed/self-initiated as appropriate

to lesson objectives.

Satisfactory

Students are connecting learning to work and life

applications, both within the discipline and with other
disciplines.

Above Average

Appropriate pace, sequencing, and variety of activities.

Satisfactory

Value and importance of content is emphasized.

Satisfactory

Appropriate questioning and inquiry techniques are

used.

Above Average

Available technology is used appropriately and

effectively.

Above Average

Instruction has been designed to be responsive to

learner needs (differentiated readiness, interest,
learner modality) if appropriate.

Above Average

Lesson activities have been designed to promote

retention and transfer.

Above Average

PAGE 3: Instructional Planning/Delivery: Learner-Centered Instruction

Q10: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas
below.
Instruction is based on objectives and core curriculum
demands.

Outstanding

Content is learner-centered.

Above Average

Strategies promote critical thinking/problem-solving.

Above Average

Strategies include motivational techniques.

Above Average

Strategies are aligned.

Above Average

PAGE 4: Instructional Planning/Delivery: Evaluation and Feedback on Student Progress

2/4

Mid-Term Evaluation by University Director of Student Teaching: Site 2 (rev.

2011)

SurveyMonkey

Q11: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas
below.
Academic progress is monitored and assessed using
formal and informal assessments.

Satisfactory

Assessment and feedback are aligned with goals,

objectives, and strategies.

Satisfactory

Assessment strategies are appropriate.

Satisfactory

Student learning is reinforced.

Above Average

Students receive constructive feedback.

Above Average

Teacher provides opportunities for relearning and reevaluation.

Above Average

PAGE 5: Instructional Planning/Delivery: Mgmt of Student Discipline, Instr Strategies, Time & Materials

Q12: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas
below.
Teacher effectively implements discipline
management.

Satisfactory

Teacher establishes climate that promotes selfdiscipline and self-direction.

Satisfactory

Teacher interacts with students equitably.

Above Average

Teacher specifies expectations for behavior.

Above Average

Teacher intervenes and re-directs behavior.

Satisfactory

Teacher reinforces desired behavior.

Satisfactory

Teacher uses equitable instructional materials.

Above Average

Teacher effectively manages materials, time, and

transitions during lesson.

Satisfactory

PAGE 6: Professional Communication

3/4

Mid-Term Evaluation by University Director of Student Teaching: Site 2 (rev.

2011)

SurveyMonkey

Q13: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas
below.
Appropriate/accurate written communication with
students.

No Opportunity to Observe

Appropriate/accurate verbal and non-verbal

communication with students.

Satisfactory

Encourages reluctant students; plans for special

needs.

Above Average

PAGE 7: Professional and Ethical Behavior

Q14: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas
below.
Plans and directs activities of classroom assistants
including paraprofessionals, volunteers, and tutor.

No Opportunity to Observe

Modifies performance based on personal and

professional critiques.

Above Average

Demonstrates flexibility.

Outstanding

Demonstrates initiative in planning, management, and

professional interactions.

Outstanding

Maintains confidentiality.

Outstanding

Demonstrates effective collaboration in one-to-one and

small group interactions.

Above Average

Fosters trust in relationships with students, families,

and colleagues.

Outstanding

Receives and responds to constructive feedback.

Outstanding

Q15: Comments on teacher candidate's effectiveness of overall instruction, use of developmentally

appropriate strategies, ability to lead the class, professionalism, attitudes, and demeanor throughout
the period of observation:
Victoria continues to do well in her second placement of student teaching. She is an amiable professional who
strives to improve on a daily basis. She is able to self-reflect on her own instruction and identify areas were
she needs to improve and adjust. She is well received by her students and cooperating teacher. She will fit in
nicely with most any school setting because she is adaptable and flexible when necessary. She continues to
refine her classroom management skills, learning what works for her teaching style and what doesn't through
putting recommended best practices to the test.

4/4