Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
AsherLadin
WaveProjectReport
SoundWaves
Thisexperimentconsistsofexposingdifferentglassthicknessestodifferentsound
frequenciesandobservingtheglasssreaction.
Introduction:
Thenaturalfrequency(
thefrequencyatwhichasystemoscillateswhennotsubjectedtoa
continuousorrepeatedexternalforce)
orresonance(
theconditioninwhichanobjectorsystem
issubjectedtoanoscillatingforce
GracePansze
havingafrequencyclosetoitsownnaturalfrequency)ofglassvariesfromeach
thickness.Whenexposedtofrequenciesgreaterthanglasssnaturalfrequency,theglasswill
physicallyreacttothesoundvibrations.Theexpectedreactionfromtheglasswastoshatter,
crack,andvibrateatfrequencieshigherthanthenaturalfrequency.
QuestionandHypothesis:
Theguidingquestionforthisexperimentwas
dodifferentthicknessesofglassesreact
differentlywhenexposedtoaconstantsoundwavefrequency?
Ifsoundwaveseffectglassthen
wethinkthatthethinnerglasswillbreakwhenexposedtofrequencybecausethenatural
frequencyislessthanthefrequencyitisexposedto.Withtheideaofresonancewethinkthat
withenoughsoundfrequencies,theglassstructurewithinwhichthesoundcanbecomefocused
andasthevolumeisincreasedthevibrationoftheglasswillfocusandbecomegreaterand
greateruntiltheybreak.
Methodsandmaterials:
Thematerialsusedinthisprocedurewere:
glass(11wineglassesofdifferentthicknesses)
speakers
caliper
soundcancellingheadphones/earplugs
computer,AUX
measuringtape
earplugs
*youcanwearsafetygogglesaswellasasafetyprecaution.
Procedure:
Step1.Measureglasssdimensionswithcalipertodetermineorderofglassesbasedonthickness
Step2.Measureglasssnaturalfrequency.
Step3.Setupspeaker,computer,putinearplugs.
Step4.Usemeasuringtapetorecord3centimetersfromspeakerandplaceglassatmark.
Step5.Nextwetappedtheglasslightlytogetitvibratingsoinsteadofreflectingsound
vibrations,theglasswouldaccepttheemittedfrequency(resonance).
Step6.Playconsistentfrequency(naturalfrequency)andobserveglassreaction.
Step7.Playhigherfrequencyandobservereaction.
Step8.Recorddataandrepeatwithdifferentglasses.*ourrecordsareinthetablebelow
Glass Glass
Numb Thickn
er
essin
mm
(edge)
Glass
Openi
ng
inmm
Heig
ht
of
Bow
lin
mm
Constant Breaki
Frequency ng
+Reaction Point
Natural
LowestFrequency
Frequency +
reaction
1.55
72.10
69.9
8
N/A
1.25k&
2.25k
2.71
51.47
86.9
5
N/A
2k
1.75
74.15
100.
17
N/A
2k&2.75k
.79
63.89
104.
24
N/A
500
&1.25k
.97
61.65
108.
1
N/A
1k&1.75
&2.5k&
2.1k
1.41
83.61
127.
13
N/A
500
1.89
73.96
117.
28
N/A
2.5k&
600&
1.5k
.7
61.65
135.
30
N/A
400
1.38
75.31
118.
15
N/A
600
&1.25k&
2.25k
10
1.98
69.94
104.
68
N/A
1.25k
11
72.80
137.
37
N/A
1.25k&
400
Thistableshowsthreedifferentmeasurementsofeachoftheelevenglasses.Also,thenatural
frequency(frequencies)thattheglasseshave.
0.7
61.65
135.3
400
11
72.8
137.37
400
1250
0.79
63.89
104.24
500
1250
1.41
83.61
127.13
500
1.89
73.96
117.28
600
1500
2500
1.38
75.31
118.15
600
1250
2250
0.97
61.65
108.1
1000
1750
2100
2500
1.55
72.1
69.98
1250
2250
10
1.98
69.94
104.68
1250
2.71
51.47
86.95
2000
1.75
74.15
100.17
2000
2750
Thistablerepresentsthenaturalfrequencies,puttingtheglassesintoorderbythicknesswhich
alsoisthesameorderasnaturalfrequencies.
Results:
Aftertryingoutmanydifferentfrequenciesfordifferentglasses,wedidnotsucceedin
breakingorcrackinganyglass.Thismaynothaveworkedbecausethenaturalfrequencyofthe
glassandthefrequencyweexposedtheglasstomaynothavematched.Also,thespeakerswe
hadavailablemaynothavebeenloudenoughortheglasswastoothick.However,itispossible
tobreakglasswithfrequencies.
Discussion:
Whenweposedourquestion(dodifferentthicknessesofglassesreactdifferentlywhen
exposedtoaconstantsoundwavefrequency?)wethoughtthatassoonastheglasswasexposed
toafrequencygreaterorequaltoitsnaturalfrequency,itwouldshatter.Wedidntevengeta
vibration.Eventhoughourexperimentwasinconclusive,wefoundmanywayofcrystalandget
alouderamptoprojectthesoundmoreconsistently.Overall,thekeytakeawayswereswecould
improvetheprocedure.Torefinethetest,wecouldgetthinnerglassesmadeusingthescientific
method,takingmeasurements,andtestingatheory.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLBt_07Vek