wm trarea lor, abla dupd ce sau afiemat (ca , rela. Acest Feno~ jac rotal jay’ jac rota inviteni ea faowr cauzal al bertisi) si de prelongive saw rears a Fimitel superioare @ pereatfe acceletayie boologicd qi paied are probabil la bazi crejerea BE peeparatie pentru. viass, wodetate si profesune — mai indelungetd, tp depialsici, Fics ignore sau’ nega, vilitates diagnostic celoralte douk 7) SS Prepare Pending fiind dezvoltarea § complicarea foarce mare 2 vietit gece gery NOEL sey Crmadnd popu alc ote JO Jociale de ansamblu. Se stie c& viata sociala, cu volumul de educatie pe care-l sa ee, aoa Achy 197 Hurtig-M, 4969), a nzonei sofiale Sc dmsamel™ tea acesiela, constitsie, materia prim nmutritivé din _ ema arooias-devvolici” (Wieomhi-b>S 1971), cx eng ne per = — care ig suing ezvoltarea psbied in onrogenees 1 fi qa a_condiuior de dezvoltare. Demersul diagnostic po Sea acereei ca wa aport previos lueracile cu privire Ia grupul mic zt procediit_ te ul scrctsst", igcluzind_o etapi (at, Zhe, 1972; Neal A497) fe din uncle odes al aralizal for nents ead ena woot probleme. tn scl tip rele 3 Qi ei el ces remo | Gourmet Rainier a irabivlatere rey 9/ means eal ye se Fat Wai ease 2. Diagnosticul nivelului de dezvoltare psihici. | Aspecte psihogenetice si formative adoprarea drept_ 241, aNivelul de dezvoltare pathic (NDP) si tipuri de demers, diagnostic z psihicis (NDI ors, Sens _ alii de dirjare ‘7 4 Pentru diagnastical psihologic, evaluarea capacitiiilor psihice normale pre- pe ee elects a qyane diagnostics luchezatl pe aceste Beau dagoonietl oSPelN fp. lind caregcia cbligatocie de ce oa buf realzatt sera dager Tibet te sotodatd termen sehaic_ Mo Ta care este definite NDP determina i SERB cores pict pe de o sare, fesvoleivex sspontant ]aunor fe Sp procednrs- diggnovck propsiu2is, - TBHe concre, (decurind din stmatieares expeenet iy [Formal )(conditionata, de experienta cu simbolutt Se pot di rpg uate de delinige a NDP, corespunaind orgnatioe woreuee REOOTEE adi-ctinied for raat gens ipsibometric;( NDA ia forma wnor pstandarde" de dezvoltare, alee pe band sradsied exprimaré ia salon cancers, Acer indict ltie @ caracteristicilor psihice diagnosticate_(inte- paar pe de_ ales i dirjare a de- ive) (Flavelt~j-—F,—1965-;—The-32-nd_sympostum, “Mod a 2 52965; Pascuabbeonef-97S} i, mai al sme pe_ci_accedbile inviga Gistribugia normal in_popul “Teernale, afecue, caracteriate fa] Sfandacdele__ntcnele ademseasplcans ain Gpgul testelar < reaulti ‘din cercetdri concrete, in care alegeren.subies confinutal — SBCA reconstitui dinamica subiectulul", 32 espandeaiei dintre r abe « iiloccele & vealnare 2. Gagnoesl NDB stot, free, og ilacsaie bn acense privet ane penapedenate cea.mal profitabild procedura de culegefe. a TOE eite_ cea mal bund pentrua_tradce informajia J deetan Prale Gat de Keronbactt Yaloaces informatici aduse de o probe a -tebus jolie in funétie de Tindunatitires pe eave ex v poate conteri deciuilor, fal conoes ragle cu cele mai bune decizif ce sar putes tua fick a wauivi, prevente ceparat in flecare Wj ‘urele precedente promigstoar i mel instrumente diagnostice sau scheme de diagnozs, ttelor cpus de abordare extnenre, Ae Kohs.cald fan, of Snvete srolvaea (Galfte-Granjoa N sarea unei modalititi analitice de evaluare rezolviti spontane sf i principiilor diagromice stg 1, 1969) sau PC, 1960; Hood B. EL, — eifse_reeiseste la diversi (Bevan W. [and aster N., 1899 5 Guilford J, Pa. 19675 usttind tendinje manifestate in eadrul orientiihi pohomering constd in a obtine o misurd a yclstiguluit dobindie daoe mantel, ca indicator al_sratei” de prog es _dliferite fe selectie profesional (Gat de setae sint cele de atentie gonstind in .erlia dea entra. extra wiséturd_caracte eorecta erorile gi de nostice ale eezultate din facilicarea invayai, lormative 2 fost manifest iim a vei actuale de a deplasa accentul, in evaluares proptesslor dig elens Siti, de_pe ierarhiganen clasifcatorie Wovidere setae Geog ee “or cic Ge a ae asian erent aac sesizarea di~ cone probele formative elaborate +” asupra relariei {nvatare-dez- intrucit permit si se ,diferentieze fe cunostinte) conpiautalar Msugit z incuse de invatare, tn Ti sein comune alserne Bee et gat fn cadral psihologiei, bazate pe teoria lui{Vigoul voltare, dari i i autori, in diferite~ per ull 9 dvestel erriloc, pe —bararea unr: cif) bs ein Profitabile din eroti propril” 8 I9I} dn cazul probelor de Grientare 4 forman'¥s, sint optimizare valengelediag.. . probe te {Gemacs nopsioizae valent ea at scurge la acea probs”. Un rol esertial in alegerea mijloacelor de diagnoza fi revine psihologyl igarea color mei tipari de demers diagnostic. schizate foainee pare(salut) els enn tear o cepts” taal us Be Dazate pe ,asamblarea” dife- : sapere ae ed; ‘dseein, pentru a oferi subiectului pastbifitatea ca, in caz de eee spon- te PN et Santee 0 1588) eee a ca raportului dintre cantitaiea del ¢ fe asemenea, ca meto- émnificativa contibunid ? lectuale (Inhel- tit ierea mi lor_de orientare fea nivel desolate ; Dodvelly pfu. nastiest dea evan wed ~ ok Pacaud 5.1971), Je bast exersarea_perfor-; rogres prin inviare. Se descriumodart a Te coat Se ni gi de cate pedagogi ca evpresie slevil dupd capacitatea lor de fnvitare, e@ principald componend-a terial 33.i (Kalmi z 175), _nefiied limitatela_aplicési_ por inl’ Gabthors 2.11 abe [nite prebieamer a & “Ath aetarce variabilele di nse, cu autor op ae oe EU ae Satie poe olvase sint extrase din rel panels cca : ‘ : mental su apps eg SEBS geomet kava Vale 1973) ich 5)" aplicabile separat sai mipecun’, Gramasied (Gaburova G. G., 1975) pl - a oa alum sapactater_de Tovijar fa_genecl. Tn acest vidios Pena tiauind i diagnoza NDP pe princi Gl ceil pre eee ee ie, Pe eterbale ph aptiadinis ehnice (lakimanskaia T. 8.5 1975). 10 sera tn, ansanbl, probleme scopucac s-mioacelor_ odes. & g'NDE adn in pe lan o observa vethe, Gat mere, 2 4: informatie psholog Tar problemele “oferive spre re S.au elaborat gi verificat experi- astfel de probe bazate pe pro- Sports recomanda un tip de mijl jloace_ca_ infaiibil, CGa toate acestea, pot ‘Scheme eficiente de_luctu_in_diagnoza ea Fuport iN Bibliografie respective, Washington, Amer! of Education, 19565 Being, New Yorks MacMilen, Con 14. New York, Wiley and Anas, A (63, Teng problems i Sas he Basket te Bee, Helen, The Deseoping Chile N.Y end Bieantlye SM sebitey ans Change. ia Haan Csecteits, Sonn 1966, ee ies ja coguitive growth, New York, Wiley and Sons, 1966 rane: Sp Stearate i ice in eegraphic language, Psichologie Review", chia hy RD, SHEA ARE Beloit, Cet lah Ue Dalvell, P. CG. Children’s “understanding of umber and related concepts, Ereus, Sp Tatroducere In pearelipy Tes adapte de Roby Goldstein Zarzo R. ct coll ire Genaon, Not Semis Torcologgve de Venta, Gente, Dalschavs ce tol Si Mee eth eae ESE, CAP jratea Baber 34 Different types of conservation and nonconservation and their re ‘to age, s0, IQ. MA’ aad. vocabulary, Child Developments 1967, Goldschmigt, MeL 1 wel 8 Guilford, J. PeThe nature of human intelligence, New York, McGraw-Hill, 1967 Flood, 8. Ya,"An experimencal sua of Piss tehory_of the development of mambee in chides in Joust of Prycholog*y 963, vl, 38 Hing, M, ©. expereass"ae_savifare copativs dob, ia Zai20° R. (re), Debiisie ‘mints, Bucusey, EDS, 1, Iakimanskabs IS © sasrabathe metods diagaouithi raza prostrnstvennoge asleaie, fn Kuloiters. 2. Ls ops ety 1975. Inhelde, By, Scat Ihy Bovet, Me Invitaea pi srocturile canoater, Bucasezt, EDP. 19/7; inhelder hy Le’ dingnowtique Gur satonnement chet ler dabiles men Jug, Neuchatel, Belechgus er Niele, 1963. Ivanova, A. Ip Briaiph ponrolena ebucesiqeegs ekepertinenta, in Prbologhiceie mitedi verge, atlas ine, Menken, ite Meany 98 Kalmthovs, Zi, Obseesemort f prinyipl portoieis metodow et diagnostiki, ia sities 2 Cad), Reablemi Wopnostki umstvennogo ‘aera wceagcibis, Maskna, fed, Poorwecen’n 1975 ova ZT, Metodika dingnowiki obtcesemost skolakow (oa materiale fski New B97 Kottbecg, Ly Stage sad sequence : the cogntive-developmental approsch to sacslration, ja Godin (ed), Handbook of rociaisidon, Chiciga, Rand McNally. 1999. Landsheere, de 6, Evaluates conti 'asleilor’ gt eamsade, Bacurey, EDD, 1978 Lronser A. Ni, Probleme’ ale dervoltih pueda, Bucur, ule ini, 196 Lipkins, A0°1. eprons o metodsx vilelends simeofenki kale licinorinoge.porametrs feateonrogo deiateinast, in Kalmikows 20 ops city ao! Loageos, F Pychologie diérenticlle et théore oplrateire de Fistelligene, Pars, Dunod, Kal 130. Meuris, G., Zahiraic Cy Davreux L., Analiza factoviald; analiza ceatroidd in, factor] comuni, Revista de sclerate, secensil qi sinteze — prhologie", 1975, Muresan, Pa Tavdjavea socal, Edit, Albanros, 1979, ‘Mussen, P. H, Conger, J. Ja Ragan, Jn, Child development and Pecsonality, NY., Evans to, 5. Francisca, Londaa, Harper Teteroational Edit, 1974 Grepurile de adolescenp, Bucuresti, EDP 1977. Onerrieth, By Introduction s Te pe¥chologie de Ventant, Parle, PLE, 1960, Peceud, 8, Le diognostique da potentiel tadividuel, iw Reuchlio ML. (eed) Teaité de psy~ ‘hologie appliquee, Par, PALE. 1975, tome 4 Pescualteone, J, On lessning and development, ,Cenadian Psychological Journal 76, part Ye Pai elon 5 ited fatate By cles Pc Ne ane P And: a) Poros SES EU fe ler a ats Pde cbse Buses Fe imi 174 Shoe! OSs meee eg BOE 2? saccemon (aa mater Seinen, Me, FRE ie toe Eilat Teste Seen we Rca of tice ace Se eee ent Aetna, Sats, Chialcenne ani ping oie, Ma Subs U Bain Gennes Sede ctor i, Bucuresti, EDP. 1962. lui, Bucuresti, EDP. 1968. restomatia puthologhicest, Moskva, Viggaa Skolty Ny, 1967 a Taylor R ee 7M ani, Bai, sities, Schiopw, U, Tnteodacere fa psbodiogostic, Besse, Tipogaia Universiti din Bucs Teodarescu, §.. Prihologia copilului, Tayi, Tipografia Universitit Al Cuza", 1974 Tucicov-Bogdan, A. (ee), Personalitates copilahi, Edit politica, 1068 Vernon, PE, Personaliey and tests and anesaments, Landaa, Methuen and Co. 1968: Tiem, ‘The structure of human abilities, London, Methuen and Coy, 1971 35,