Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
West Asiatic
Architecture
Reference: History of Architecture by Sir
Banister Fletcher, 17th ed.
Arch. Christina
Influences
Geographical.
Geographically speaking, Babylonia and Assyria were one
country which ancient writers called Assyria. Just as the
pyramids and early monuments of Egypt clustered first
around the Nile, so in Chaldea the earliest building appear
to have been at the mouth of the two famous rivers of
Western Asia, the Tigris and the Euphrates.
In Egypt civilization spread southwards from
Memphis to Philas, whereas in Western Asia it advanced
northwards from Babylon in Chaldea to Nineveh in Assyria,
and thus in both countries it followed the natural course,
inland from the sea.
On the east of Babylonia and Assyria was ancient Persia,
which, under Cyrus and Darius, extended over the high
plateau of Iran from the Tigris to the Indus.
Geological.
Babylonia or Chaldea is an alluvial district of thick mud and
clay deposited by the two rivers, the Tigris and the
Euphrates. Such soil, in which no stone was found and no
trees would grow, was eminently suitable for the making of
bricks, which thus became the usual building material in
Babylonia.
The walls were constructed of crude, sun-dried
bricks faced with kiln-baked bricks of different colors.
There were also bitumen springs to be found, and in early
times not bitumen or pitch was used as cementing
material, and mortar of calcareous earth in later periods.
In Assyria there was plenty of stone in the
mountains to the north, but the Assyrian followed the
Babylonians in the use of brick; though they faced the walls
Climatic
Chaldea was, by reason of its situation around the river
deltas, a region of swamps and floods, besides which
torrents of rain fell for weeks at a time, and these
conditions were aggravated during the long summer by
unhealthy, miasmic exhalations.
Therefore elevated platforms on which to build
towns and palaces were desirable. Assyria, nearer the
mountains and farther from the river mouths than Chaldea,
had a similar estimate but with fewer swamps and lesser
miasma, but any climatic difference had little effect on
architecture, as Assyrians followed the Babylonian style.
The Dry, hot climate of the high table-land of
Persia was striking contrast to the damp of the low-lying
plains of the Mesopotamia, and it accounts for the
innovation of open columned halls in the palaces of Susa
and Persepolis.
Religious
Page 1
Social
In Babylon, a powerful priestly class arrogated to itself the
learning known as Chaldean wisdom. The degree of
civilization reached by the Babylonians was extraordinary:
they had an elaborate legal system, cities had rights and
charters, there were feudal holdings, a system of police and
even a postal service. They practiced a cuneiform system
of writing on clay tablets which have proved more lasting
than the Egyptian records on perishable papyrus.
The Babylonians were
primarily traders in origin
and commercial life
flourished. The people
were divided into nobles
with hereditary estates, a
landless class of freemen,
and lastly slaves, a social
system that is not only
Medieval but almost
modern in some aspects.
In Assyria a military
autocracy with a conscript army was the dominating class.
Page 2
Arch. Christina
Page 3
Architectural Character
Comparative Analysis
Page 4
PLANS
The Assyrians, who throughout this comparative
table are taken to include Babylonians, erected
temples and palaces on artificial platforms, reached
by flights of steps, 30 to 50 ft. above the plain, for
defense and protection against malaria.
Halls and rooms grouped round open quadrangles
were long and narrow, so as to be easy to vault.
Ziggurats, which rose tower-like in diminishing
terraces to the temple observatory at the top, had
their angles to the cardinal points, thus differing from
Egyptian pyramids whose sides were so placed.
Assyrian buildings were designed for both internal
and external effect, in contrast with Egyptian temples
which, behind the massive entrance pylons, were
enclosed by a plain and forbidding girdle wall which
gradually decreased in height from front to back.
Arch. Christina
OPENINGS
Assyrian doorways were spanned by semicircular
arches, here first met with as ornamental features,
suitable to the nature of brick construction. At palace
entrances the arches were enhanced by decorative
archivolts of coloured bricks.
WALLS
Assyrian walls were composite structures of sundried bricks faced with kiln-dried bricks, which
contrast with the massive stone walls of the Egyptians
and the solid marble walls of the Greeks. Palace walls
were frequently sheathed internally with alabaster
bas-reliefs which record military and sporting
exploits.
ROOFS
Assyrian roofs were externally flat and were probably
rendered waterproof by means of bitumen. As is still
usual in the unchanging East, they were used as a
resort in the cool of the evening and were concealed
behind battlemented cresting.
The houses of Babylon were vaulted, as at Khorsabad,
Page 5
MOULDINGS
Assyrians, like Egyptians, had no general use for
mouldings, as their architecture was on too vast a
scale for such treatment, and moreover the glazed
Page 6
Arch. Christina
Page 7