Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 1

RAMON L. LABO, JR., PETITIONER, VS.

COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, AND ROBERTO


ORTEGA, RESPONDENTS. / ROBERTO C. ORTEGA, PETITIONER, VS. COMMISSION ON
ELECTIONS, AND RAMON L. LABO, JR., RESPONDENTS
Facts:
Ramon Labo is a Australian citizen by virtue of his marriage to his Australian wife. He then ran
for the office of Mayor of Baguio City. However, his contender questions his eligibility for the office for
the reason of his citizenship. Ramon Labo then contends that when he was elected as mayor, he
effectively renounce his Australian citizenship.
ISSUE:
1. Whether or not the petitioner Ramon Labo has renounced his citizenship via election.
2. Whether or not respondent Ortega should succeed as Mayor of Baguio.
HELD:

1. No. Petitioner is still a citizen of Australia for having renounced his allegiance in the
Philippines by taking an oath to the Queen of Australia. Furthermore, hi s election does
not automatically restore his Philippine citizenship, the possession of which is an
indispensable requirement for holding public office (Sec. 39, Local Government Code).

2. No. there is the question of whether or not the private respondent, who filed the quo warranto
petition, can replace the petitioner as mayor. He cannot. The simple reason is that as he
obtained only the second highest number of votes in the election, he was obviously not the
choice of the people of Baguio City. Also, it would be extremely repugnant to the basic
concept of the constitutionally guaranteed right to suffrage if a candidate who has not
acquired the majority or plurality of votes is proclaimed a winner and imposed as the
representative of a constituency, the majority of which have positively declared through their
ballots that they did not choose him.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi