Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Fall 2010
Essay 2: Rhetorical Analysis
For this essay, you will choose one of the essays weve read in the past few
weeksLetter from Birmingham Jail, Vivisection, or From Students, Less
Kindness from Strangers?and analyze its use of one rhetorical technique,
particularly in terms of how this technique affects the essays meaning, either
in part or as a whole. You may wish to understand this technique in terms of
its appeal to logos, ethos, and/or pathos.
Getting started: I recommend that you begin by choosing the text you wish to write
about and then re-reading it. After youve done this, choose one technique that
stands out to you. For example, in Birmingham Jail, MLK repeatedly uses parallel
structure in his sentences. An essay could focus on Kings use of such a structure. In
Vivisection, Lewis refers to a literary critic and a Shakespeare play to make an
argument about what is commonly understood as a scientific, not a literary, issue. In
this case, an essay could examine Lewiss use of this example and its implications.
Or, in From Students you might examine Pauls use of a sociologists words as
authority for the claims shes making.
After youve chosen your text and the rhetorical strategy employed by its author, get
to work. Find multiple examples of this strategy and write them down. (If you only
have one example, as with Lewiss Shakespeare quote, you may have to think not
about a repeated rhetorical strategy but how a single strategy is affects the text as a
whole.) For each example, give its context and then summarize it. Then, using the
concern about justicean authority akin to the Scriptures themselves, documents the
clergymen in his audience would take seriously. Such a strategy helps bolster Kings ethical
credibility.
In addition to its similarity to passages from the Bible, Kings use of parallelism
helps us see, or hear, how closely errors appear to the truth, and how radically different.
The word injustice is merely one syllable away from justice, but this small difference has
vast implications. Using this small difference, King argues that tolerating a small error in
thinking risks destroying the larger moral order. This, too, might appeal to his audiences
theological concerns, who understand that the nature of humanity has been tragically
affected by such small errors. As the Apostle Paul, whom King quotes in his essay, puts it,
[T]hrough one man sin entered the world (Rom. 5.12).