Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 2

Name Nicolasa Almonte

World History Block ______


PEET Paragraph Rubric
Exceeds
Standard
(4)

Meets
standard

Approaches
Standard
(3)

Point
thoughtfully &
creatively
answers the
focus question,
and thesis is
clear.
Evidence given
is relevant,
effective, and
the best possible
to clearly
support point.

Point clearly
answers focus
question & thesis
is clear.

Point attempts to
answer focus
question, but
thesis is unclear.

No point is
evident.

Evidence given
is relevant and
effective in
supporting point.

Evidence given
partially supports
point or is
unclear.

No evidence is
given.

More than 1
piece of
evidence is
used.
Each piece of
evidence is
properly cited.

1 piece of
evidence is used.

Attempts to use
evidence

No attempt to
use evidence

Each piece of
evidence is
cited, but
capitalization or
period
placement is off.
C & BI gives the
reader a general
understanding of
the evidence
given.

One or more
pieces of
evidence is not
cited correctly.

No evidence
citation is
evident.

Some C & BI
given, but not
enough for reader
to properly
understand the
evidence given.

Little to no C
& BI given.
Reader does
not
understand
the evidence
given.

(3.5)
POINT
Does the point clearly answer the
focus question? Does the reader
know what you are trying to prove?

EVIDENCE
Does the writer clearly support
his/her point using facts, reasons,
examples, and/or details from the
text or research?
Does the writer use at least 2 facts
to support their point?
CITATIONS
Is each piece of evidence properly
cited?

Not
Present
(0)

EXPLANATIONS
Does the writer give enough context
and background information for the
reader to understand the
significance of the evidence?
(Explain the evidence for reader who
knows nothing about your topic.)

C & BI gives the


reader a
thorough &
complete
understanding of
the evidence
given.

Does the writer explain how the


evidence chosen proves their point?

Explanation
connects
evidence to the
point and is
thorough,
thoughtful, and
builds on prior
arguments.
Concluding
sentences go
beyond
summary to tie
argument to the
evidence given.

Explanation
connects
evidence to the
point.

Explanation
makes some
connection
(partial or
incomplete) to
the point.

No
explanation of
how evidence
proves point is
given.

Concluding
sentences
summarize
argument in your
own words.

Concluding
sentences
summarize
argument by restating your
original point.

Concluding
sentences are
absent or fail
to provide
summary of
argument.

Concluding
statement
thoughtfully &
persuasively
explains overall
significance of
argument.
Paper is
completely errorfree.

Concluding
statement
explains overall
significance of
argument.

Concluding
statement
attempts to
explain overall
significance of
argument.

Concluding
statement is
not present.

Paper is
practically errorfree (1-2
grammatical

Paper has 3-5


grammatical
errors.

Paper has 5 or
more
grammatical
errors.

TIE-BACK
Does the writer make a clear
connection between the
evidence/explanation given and their
original point?
Does the writer provide a strong
concluding statement that explains
the significance of his/her point?
Does it answer the So what?

PROOF-READING
Is it clear that the paper has been
carefully proof-read for grammar,
spelling, and punctuation errors?

errors).

27 / 32
Did you meet proficiency?
YES ----- NO

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi