Gordon v. Impulse Marketing Group Inc Doc.

84
Case 2:04-cv-05125-FVS Document 84 Filed 09/15/2005

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2 EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
3

5
JAMES S. GORDON, JR., an individual
residing in Benton County, Washington, No. CV-04-5125-FVS
6

7
ORDER GRANTING MOTION
Plaintiff, FOR TELEPHONIC HEARING
8

9
v.

10
IMPULSE MARKETING GROUP, INC.,a Nevada
11
Corporation,

12
Defendant.
13
IMPULSE MARKETING GROUP, INC.,
14
Third-Party Plaintiff,
15

16 BONNIE GORDON, JAMES S. GORDON, III,

JONATHAN GORDON, JAMILA GORDON, ROBERT
17 PRITCHETT and EMILY ABBEY,
18 Third-Party Defendants.
19
The Court, being fully advised, now, therefore,
20
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
21
1. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 1, which states
22
that the rules "shall be construed and administered to secure the
23
just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action",
24
Defendant's Motion for Telephonic Oral Argument, Ct. Rec. 77, is
25
GRANTED. The October 12, 2005, hearing on Plaintiff's Motion to
26

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR TELEPHONIC HEARING - 1

Dockets.Justia.com
 Case 2:04-cv-05125-FVS Document 84 Filed 09/15/2005

1 Dismiss Counterclaims and Third Party Defendants Under FRCP 12(b)(6)

2 or in the Alternative For Summary Judgment Under FRCP 56 or in the
3 Alternative To Dismiss Under FRCP 9(b), Ct. Rec. 40, and Defendant's
4 Motion for Dismissal of Third-Party Defendant Lew Reed, Ct. Rec. 50,
5 will be conducted via telephonic conference with all parties
6 participating by telephone. Counsel for Defendant Impulse Marketing
7 Group, Inc. shall initiate the call.
8 2. The Defendant's Motion to Expedite, Ct. Rec. 75, is GRANTED.
9 IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Executive is hereby
10 directed to enter this Order and furnish copies to counsel.
11 DATED this 15th day of September, 2005.
12
s/ Fred Van Sickle
13 Fred Van Sickle
United States District Judge
14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR TELEPHONIC HEARING - 2