Massoli v. Regan Media, et al Doc.

82

6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9 J EN N A M A SSO LI J EN N A)
p /k/a No. CIV 05-0854-PHX-EHC
JAM ESON, )
10 ) ORDER
Plaintiff, )
11 )
vs. )
12 )
REGAN M EDIA and JUDITH REGAN, an)
13 individual, )
)
14 Defendants. )
)
15 REGAN M EDIA, INC., a New York)
corporation, and JUDITH REGAN, an)
16 individual, )
)
17 Defendants/Count erclaimants,)
)
18 vs. )
)
19 J EN N A M A SSO LI, p /k/a J EN N A)
JAM ESON, an individual, )
20 )
Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, )
21 )
and )
22 )
JAY GRDINA, an individual, )
23 )
Counterdefendant. )
24 )

25
26 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff/Counterdefendant and Counterdefendant's

27 M otion for Determination that Arizona Law Applies to this M atter. [Dkt. 34]. The

28 M otion is fully briefed.

Case 2:05-cv-00854-EHC Document 82 Filed 02/21/2006 Page 1 of 2

Dockets.Justia.com
 1 The M otion for Determination was filed because the parties disputed the

2 applicable law in the briefing concerning Defendants/Counterclaimants' M otion for

3 Judgment on the Pleadings [dkt. 15] and Plaintiff/Counterdefendant and

4 Counterdefendant's Rule 56(f) M otion [dkt. 19, p. 5]. The Court found those M otions

5 were mooted by subsequent amendment to the Complaint. [Dkt. 51].

6 Accordingly,

7 IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff/Counterdefendant and Counterdefendant's

8 M otion for Determination that Arizona Law Applies to this M atter [dkt. 34] is DENIED
9 as moot, without prejudice to reurging.

10 DATED this 18th day of February, 2006.

11

12

13

14

15

16

17
18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25
26

27

28

-2-
Case 2:05-cv-00854-EHC Document 82 Filed 02/21/2006 Page 2 of 2