Sluttish Dreams and the Time of Anachronism in Keats In the opening verse paragraph of The Fall of Hyperion Keats opposes two kinds of dreams: Those that are inscribed on vellum and those that are not. Whereas for those dreamers without the aid of the shadows of melodious utterance, they live, dream and die (6-7), Poesy, Keats goes on, tell[s] her dreams, / With the fine spell of words alone can save / Imagination from the sable charm / And dumb enchantment (8-11). At stake is the difference between a seemingly finite life cyclelive, dream and dieand one of non-cyclical, or nonfinite nature, involving the weighty acts both of tell[ing] and sav[ing]. Keats fascination with the temporality of reading, its lives or afterlives, is a constant preoccupation, re-emerging in the fragment This living hand, now warm and capable and elsewhere. Yet what separates Keats vision from mere reflections on the death of the authorhere at leastis its specifically oneiric focus. For dreams may speak at once to the past, the present or the future. Indeed, what makes a dream a dream is precisely its areferential, futural, or potentially indeterminate address. Prior, then, even to the question of inscription, the dream bears with it an uncanny temporality that disrupts referential interpretation and makes anachronism essential to any project of reading. Inscription doubles downso to speakon the dreams anachronistic nature, by causing it to live on, beyond the proper time of life, in what amounts in Keats verse to a deathless survival. This paper approaches dreaming and inscription in Keats as two modes of uncanny or anachronistic temporalities. It asks, moreover, how each introduces the problem of timeliness into his writings, turning his verse at the same time into timely/untimely texts and reflections on this conditioning temporal element. If Poesy for Keats is necessarily anachronistic, how does this reinterpret or pose essential problems for the Western trope of poetic immortality as
Adam Ross Rosenthal
Texas A&M University arrosenthal@gmail.com
timelessnessShakespeares famous rejection of sluttish time? Would not Keatsian
anachronism bear with it an essentially sluttish nature? How does Keats poetry speak to this sluttishness and its importance for reading or survival?