Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
COST1 = $13,123-$0.30OUTPUT.
STD. t-
PREDICTOR COEFFICIENT DEV. RATIO p
Constant 13123 2635 4.98 0.000
2.28
OUTPUT -0.297 5 -0.13 0.899
S.E.E. = $4,871
R-squared = 0.2%
Adjusted R-squared = 0.0%
F-statistic = 0.02 (p = 0.899)
COST2 = $8,455+$7.40OUTPUT.
t-
COEFFICIEN STD. RATI
PREDICTOR T DEV. O p
0.00
Constant 8455 1550 5.45 0
1.34 0.00
OUTPUT 7.397 5 5.50 0
S.E.E. = $2,866
R-squared = 75.2%
Adjusted R-squared = 72.7%
F-statistic = 30.26 (p = 0.000)
The third simple regression equation is
COST3 = $662+12.7OUTPUT
t-
COEFFICIEN STD. RATI
PREDICTOR T DEV. O p
0.20
Constant -661.5 488.4 -1.35 5
0.423 0.00
OUTPUT 12.7298 6 30.05 0
S.E.E. = $902.8
R-squared = 98.9%
Adjusted R-squared = 98.8%
F-statistic = 903.1 (p = 0.000)
C. Are the quadratic and cubic cost functions likely to improve upon
the level of fit provided by the linear cost function? Is it likely that
such models would reduce the overall level of cost explanation?