Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
2015
1m
2m
Plant
s
Circular
pavement
(a)
(300 2 100 2 )
25 10
1005
2015
100( 2 )
25
110 ( 2 )
25
120( 2 )
25
...
S 20
25
25
25
25
This is an arithmetic progression with a
Number of tiles S 20
100( 2 )
10(2 )
,d
25
25
20 100(2 ) 290(2 )
2
25
25
= 980
*Alternative Method 3:
From the diagram on the right,
AOB tan 1
12.5
and
100
2AOB
14.25
Hence, for the innermost layer, the
number of tiles
360
14.25
25.3
For the second layer,
A1OB1 tan 1
12.5
and
110
1 2A1OB1 12.97
Number of tiles
360
12.97
27.8
2015
12.5
and 2 2A2 OB2 11.89
120
Number of tiles
360
11.89
30.3
For the fourth layer,
A3 OB3 tan 1
12.5
and 3 2A3 OB3 10.98
130
Number of tiles
360
10.98
32.8
This is an arithmetic progression: 25.3, 27.8, 30.3, 32.8,
a = 25.3, d = 2.5,
hence, the total number of tiles S 20
20
2(25.3) (20 1)2.5
2
= 981
Method 2 is a more accurate estimation compare with method 1. Method 2 takes into
consideration the spaces between tiles whereas Method 1 does not. Method 1 is quick
and simple and therefore easy to understand. This is a major reason why it is being
practiced by most masons with some modification. Due to their experience, they deduct a
certain number of tiles from the total number required by the area calculation to
compensate for the spaces between tiles, and they are quite accurate.
2015
Octagonal pavement
Method 1 : (Area)
Area of one trapezium =
1
1
(300)(300) sin 45 (100)(100) sin 45
2
2
Number of tiles =
1
(90000 10000) sin 45
2
320000 sin 45
250
= 905
MM1 = M1M2 = 10 cm
P1Q1 PQ 2 P1 R1
2015
P2 Q2 P1Q1 2 P2 R2
P1 R1 P2 R2 10 tan 22.5
and this is an arithmetic progression.
How many layers are required?
PP1 P1 P2
10
cos 22.5
Number of layers
200
10
cos 22.5
18.4776 18
S18
18
2(200 sin 22.5) (18 1)20 tan 22.5
2
S18
106
25
2015
3
tiles
2015
There is quite a difference between Method 1 and Method 2. This is probably due to the
number of layers of tiles. Method 2 only considers 18 complete layers which does not
cover the whole area of the octagon pavement, whereas Method 1 considers the whole
area.
(b)
Comparing the circular design and the octagonal design, the octagonal design will be
easier to construct because of its straight line layers and management of the few empty
spaces between the tiles. To lay the tiles in circles will be quite a task and there empty
spaces to fill in between every tile.
2015
FURTHER EXPLORATION
(a)
ON
OK
67.11
=1.172 radian
3m
Area of segment KLMN
1
(300 2 )(1.172 sin 67.11)
2
2.5 m
11283 .60
45
250
= 1920
2015
Method 2:
To calculate the number of tiles required for the arcs passing through points K1, K2, K3
and K4.
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
20 100(2 ) 290( 2 )
73.91
2
25
25
1887
2015
1
HF EH
2
1
135
50 50 tan
2
2
1
135
(90000 10000) sin 45 2 2500 tan
2
2
440477.27 cm2
Number of tiles required 1762
(c)
Valid reasons must be given for which ever design chosen. Alternative design
suggested must also be accompanied with logical reasons.
(d)
Reasons must be given as to whether it is practical to use aluminium tins and sand to lay
the pavement. Illustrations with diagrams or pictures will be an advantage.
REFLECTION
Students are free to express their feelings and opinions while they are conducting the project.
They should be able to explain the related moral values during the process. They may present
these through usage of symbols, illustrations, drawings and even through a poem or song.
10