Christine Varad v. Reed Elsevier Incorporated Doc.

43
Case 1:06-cv-11370-MLW Document 43 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

CHRISTINE VARAD, )
)
Plaintiff, )
v. ) CIVIL ACTION
) NO. 06-11370-MLW
REED ELSEVIER INCORPORATED, )
d/b/a/ Lexis Nexis, Lexis Nexis Risk )
& Information Analytics Group, Inc., )
)
Defendant. )

SCHEDULING ORDER AND

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL

On May 2, 2007, this court held a status conference pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.

16(a) and a hearing to consider oral argument on the “Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel

Production of Documents Pursuant to F. R. Civ. P. 37(a)” (Docket No. 40). After

reviewing the parties’ submissions and considering the parties’ arguments, this court

hereby ORDERS as follows:

1. The plaintiff’s motion to compel is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

The parties are to confer, and plaintiff will file a supplemental motion to
compel if necessary.

2. The parties shall complete fact discovery by July 13, 2007.

3. The parties shall file any motions for summary judgment by August 31,
2007. Any oppositions to motions for summary judgment should be filed in
accordance with the applicable rules.

4. Any concise statement of material facts that is filed pursuant to Local Rule
56.1 in opposition to a motion for summary judgment shall include

Dockets.Justia.com
 Case 1:06-cv-11370-MLW Document 43 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 2 of 2

numbered paragraphs admitting or denying, paragraph by paragraph, the

facts contained in the moving party’s concise statement of material facts.

/ s / Judith Gail Dein

Judith Gail Dein
United States Magistrate Judge
Dated: May 3, 2007