Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 2

JALOZA et al v. NEWMAN et al Doc.

9
Case 1:07-cv-00773-DFH-JMS Document 9 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

STEVEN JALOZA and SALVATORE )


FRADELLA, )
)
Plaintiffs, )
) Case No. 1:07-cv-773-DFH-JMS
v. )
)
JOSEPH NEWMAN, et al., )
)
Defendants. )

ORDER OF REMAND

Plaintiffs have moved to remand this action to state court because the

removal relied upon the court’s diversity jurisdiction, and at least two of the

removing defendants are citizens of Indiana. Citizens of the forum state may not

remove based on diversity jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b). Counsel for

defendants have advised the court staff they do not intend to respond to the

motion. Accordingly, the motion to remand is hereby GRANTED, and this action

is hereby REMANDED to the Marion Circuit Court.

So ordered.

Date: June 20, 2007


DAVID F. HAMILTON, JUDGE
United States District Court
Southern District of Indiana

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 1:07-cv-00773-DFH-JMS Document 9 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 2 of 2

Copies to:

David W. Gray
Lewis & Kappes, P.C.
dgray@lewis-kappes.com

Gary P. Price
Lewis & Kappes, P.C.
gprice@lewis-kappes.com

Clayton A. Graham
Coleman Graham & Stevenson, LLC

John A. Frazier
Alexander & Associates, P.C.
jaf-law@comcast.net

Daniel S. Mason
Zelle, Hofmann, Voelbel, Mason Gette, LLP

-2-

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi