Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
OVERVIEW
The American School Counselor
Association (ASCA) collaborated to
create a National Model for School
Counseling Programs to connect school
counseling with the current educational
reform movements that emphasize
student achievement and success.
RATIONALE
of consistent identity
Limited or no involvement in reform
movements
Variation in roles from state to state and
site to site
Non-school counselor responsibilities
Prevention education
Developmental in nature
A collaborative effort
Driven by data
Integrated into the Total Educational Program
Academics, Career, Personal/Social Development
Data Driven
What
The
do counselors do?
HOW
From EntitlementTo
Performance
From a Program that:
Focuses generally on the number of
activities
Measures the amount of effort
Attends to the process of doing work
Works to maintain the existing system
From EntitlementTo
Performance
To A Program That:
Focuses on outcomes and improved
results
Measures impact related to goals
Attends to goals, objectives, and
outcomes
Changes and adapts to be more
responsive
From EntitlementTo
Performance
From counselors who:
Focus on good intentions
Talk about how hard they work
Generally feel little need to change their
behavior or approach
From EntitlementTo
Performance
To Counselors Who:
Focus on accomplishments
Talk about effectiveness
Know their future rests on
accomplishments
Communicate goals and objectives
Implications
Counseling
Leadership
Assessment
Technology
Managing Resources
Teaming
Collaboration
Data-Driven Decisions
Advocacy
HOW
Comprehensive School
Counseling
A Comprehensive School Counseling
program includes:
Program Planning
Individual and Group Counseling
Consulting (students, parents, teachers,
agencies)
Coordinating Services
Student Appraisal
Professional Development
FOUNDATION
DELIVERY SYSTEM
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM
IMPLEMENTATION
CHANGE
FOUNDATION
agree statements
Mission Statement
Describes
1: Program organization
Standard 2: School guidance curriculum
delivered to all students
Standard 3: Individual student planning
Standard 4: Responsive Services
Standard 5: Systems support
Standard 6: School counselor and
administrator agreement
Delivery System
School
Guidance Curriculum
Individual Student Planning
Responsive Services
System Support
Guidance Curriculum
Environmental issues
Discipline records
Student records
Standardized test scores
systemic activities
Designed to assist students in
establishing personal goals
Designed to assist students in
developing future plans
Helps students get from point A to point
B
Responsive Services
Designed
needs
Individual, group and crisis counseling
Consultation, referral, mediation and
information
Available to all students and parents
System Support
Program
Management System
Agreements
Advisory Council
Use of Time
Calendars
Action Plans
Guidance Curriculum
Closing the Gap
Use of Data
Agreements
To
Advisory Council
Group
Counselor,
administrator, teachers,
parents, students, community members
Use of Time
Elementary
Guidance Curriculum 35 45%
Individual Planning 5 10%
Responsive Services 30 40%
System Support 10 15%
Use of Time
Middle School
Guidance Curriculum 25 35%
Individual Planning 15 25%
Responsive Services 30 40%
System Support 10 -15%
Use of Time
High School:
Guidance Curriculum 15 -25%
Individual Planning 25 35%
Responsive Services 25 35%
System Support 15 20%
Calendars
Master
Calendar
Weekly Calendar
Published
Ensures planned activities are completed
PR Tool
Action Plans
Domain,
Pre/post tests
Comparison to baseline data
Use of Data
Student Monitoring collection, analysis
and interpretation of data to ensure all
students achieve academic success
Closing the Gap Use of disaggregated
data which discerns the discrepancies
between the desired results and the
results currently being achieved
Freshmen Promotion
Incoming
ACCOUNTABILITY
Results
Reports
School counselor performance
evaluations
Program Audit
Results Reports
Data:
Process
Perception
Results
Over Time: Immediate, Intermediate,
Long Range
Personal/Social Results
Conflict Resolution ( K 5)
Number of students who could peacefully resolve
a conflict INCREASED from 55% to 88%
Following implementation of a Conflict Manager
program the number of suspended students
was REDUCED from 13% in 97/98 to 3% in
01/02
IMPLEMENTATION
Administrator
Support
Planned Steps
On-going Program Evaluation
Steps to Implementation
What if my school doesnt want to change?
Ask yourself
Steps to Implementation
1. Planning the Program
2. Building Your Foundation
3. Designing the Delivery System
4. Implementing the Program
5. Making the Program Accountable
Next Steps
Review
action plans
Learn from experience
Look at ways to implement new pieces of
the National Model each year for 3 -5
years
Best Practices
Understand
details
Collaborate
Collaborate
In Closing..
All this will not be finished in the first one
hundred days. Nor will it be finished in
the first thousand days, nor in the life of
this administration, nor even perhaps in
our lifetime on this planet.
BUT LET US BEGIN.
John F. Kennedy
And Finally.
WE
WE
Questions?