nl
PHONETICS IN
ANCIENT INDIA
W, SIDNEY ALLEN
Pojemr of Compras Piss
(nite Unter of Comber
oxFoRD wOve Univerity Pry, Amen Howe, Lndon 4
PREFACE
Ts book is intended as a guide to the appreiton ofthe eats
phonetcians Whitney's ploneer expontions of certain of our
fources some eighty yeas ago ae acknowlaged in the intr
tory chaper; but 4 general reinterpretation has now long been
implica that they dapley aleelo phonetic
Siacoure beyond the fll comprehension of Whitney aad his cone
temporarcn, suchas only the advances ofthe te ineecnth and
the trent centuries enable sto apprecite oday. The reognt
tion that analycs a advanced intel technique shoul have been
cvclved at so early date may well ingpre 1 slutury scent
Nami, and i woud be at once arogunt and peste na to
‘expect that a reoterpretatin will pan be necessary in another
‘Sty years—or even eight
Tam rate to Profesor J R. Firth forthe encouraging ictret
the a shown atl stages inthe progres ofthis work, and no les
for his constructive mggestions; and Tw happy to acknowledge
the recarches af De Sildheshre Varma, the stinulin of whose
[pulled work has been augmented fr me by the backround of
[is personal association with Profewor Firth over twenty years
gon asociation which has le, in the ight of conte
init, to a fuller reaiation of the wealth that lest the
ancient eats My thanks are aio de wo Profesor J. Brough,
‘tho real the work in ampuscript and made 4 nurmber of help
‘ticle and to Mr. C. A. Ryland aad Me Re, Robin Whe
feveroaly undertook to read the whole of the proofs daring my
Shvene in India,
Finally acknowledge the generosity shown by the sthoriten
‘ofthe Schoo! of Oriental und African Stadia in providing fll
fulventon for the publication ofthis work.
W.8, ALLENCONTENTS
(00. The Grammatial Achievement
(04, The Indian Tflence on Western Phoneticn
‘02, The Sources
03. The Sanit Alphabet
04. The Principles of Description
040. Word and Sentence
(041. Phonetics and Phonology
042. Terminology
(043. Order of Ansys
(Chart of Sanurit Alphabet
10, Mental
1.1, Physiologie:
1:10, Chifeaton
tut, Teee-bocea
1.110, Vowels and Consonants
tuara, Friatives
Semivowele
“Liquid
sang, Retrallesion
saa, Bxtr-buced
a3. The eargar
4
4
2
7
»“= contents,
120, Cononant
2.00, Pulmonic and Geta
201. Velir
al, aw
$340. Word- and Morpheme junction
3:11 Tnitiaty and ality
5.12, Leerjunction:
3130, Consnant stop (abhinidhana)
5121. rf consonat (rarabhaki)
3:22, Stop naal (yams)
4.123, Fretives nasal
124. Stop frcatve
135, Gemiastion
42. Syllable structure:
$320. Vowel and Consonant
Sylabie Division
3:22, Length and Duration
323. Quanity
324, Tone
33: Tempo
EDITIONS OF TECHNICAL WORKS
REFERRED TO
Whe mr a itn nt teri iii hat
nen meen estou aes
Ania Sia Up. 8)
ik Rag Vi, VS, a4 pp 228
Atha: Prato (AP) (= Samant
Ta ad tn WD. Whey, JA08 vs 335%
Aihara rains ee 5.8.8)
Ted and Shar, Lab, 938
Ek WV. Shave aor, 15)
Mapas Sb
onda Sieg. Men, tre
oA VAR, Dinar and 83, Arya. Poon, 8
Kanal Sit
Sas Ram JV, 198; 108
hatha (34)
Sete Nominee
‘Wid Pre of Kept nd Papeddtan of Ansan, ed
‘Sat Pee Ahan. inde, O48
‘Tal Vo Trp Clbahar ts) Lap, 13
Pig (Pon)
"TE ind ta. 0 hing Lei, 887
Ee ek 8 che Atal, 7
JP L Ren eT Aa, ih, Pai 28
Pie Sid PS)
TE ea aA. We, adc Sain, 8 48-71
Wee iF an an
who te Sia Pui dS Prk oan eal M. Gon
‘Case 1538
Piet, Chana Sane
"YE ac Ac Weber, dice Sn, wi 8, wm 39
‘ibe come aap, er Shs (A Pn),
‘cise 1
mit cer leon sm wee Yau hr pnts Compr
Sem ha Pr Save th has ak 2. Wa. Be 8)i id
PF Chembur, VS x e38 ww
Seema Se
BEET et AO, Pte, Conger, 186
ee Rk hy Yajima nd wh, Yoeisiors
Sia cher St Sou Bae os
Tairow raat 1?)
ME ed ee, Whines YAO i
ELK hargnayeand RS Sua Sem 3) Myre,
ed wa W. Pern Matin 1854
Pains Kye (VP,
Ver the commer of Oooo Asura
gh pp be e28
INTRODUCTION
0.0. The Grammatical Achievement
Inthe epbere of gramear iti grifyng cat of present-day
Linguiat to pay Iipserice tothe geste of descriptive gran
‘marian, the ancient Indian Piainis and t wae wn eloquent tite
toi achievement that one af the great lingua of our own te
should write
Indoatopearcomparae ranma (tl) a eve oy
‘ow apt ancpe fs hen, he wma of Peeters
ie Bupa langunes ih nly the aoa prams of
eck Lain wly nope ad estate For ane
{rage tthe pt hve men eed compari to Pas eon i
‘ater ange, nn ely Hany engage pen toy wl bo
pty rrdad
at in apie of the invaluable ranaation of hi wok by Bailing
‘and nom by Reno, ues the nguit himself also a Sanskrit
here are insuperale dificlice i the way of fll appreciation
‘of Pin’ achievement; and even forthe Satan complete
‘understanding not exlyatined-agin to quote Blomfield,
es with wy conn we poets ee hs
feo il have tobe op opon Pit tee we haven emery
‘tabi expan of the ngwage which he reared fra ne
1s inded inthe extent of the interpretive materi seme of
which ha felt stained oa canonial ats, thet we Fd king
‘evidence ofthe honour accorded tothe grea rarmanan his
Sum land Rat this profusion of commentaries abo bear wioent
tothe dials of Papin tecnque:compened whan algebraic
‘ndenation, his work linguists and nea ingunge teacher's
‘rammar, and for th more pedestrian purpose of teaching Sansit
ering wet « practieal nee, thin giving rise to farther
(eammatiel hierarchies dexcending to x miscellany of schoole
ramimar of recent dae.” Te ha been calclated tht there are i
fxitence ever a thavand diferent Sanskrit works on Sanskrit
1 L Mansel anu,
1p the Pipe Sh Ha, wsten wen an soma ea,
ser Spawn foo tan te a
ope
Nina's, Panam Dl Dai’ Sith
swt mina Egham. PHONETICS IN ANCIENT INDIA
‘except for fragmentary citations, has been le .
ec
ieee ee nc ochre
st gant neue
nme think of any peat of tne tori devel of wane werk ot
sina wth the eames a eg oth en ask,
‘wy some of or ne equate
7 of out mote grtegue an inadeyune tion
(4, ta me by tig bck the Lan rae
{Lars sometnes ws fr a Digan Thar reves Anes
tegen sang the cpm ef anon pont hog
rere Todi wes ae tncenn and en mone eee es
intl more evaring And in th el th got foes
‘ately in a more advantageous positon to appreciate the acco
bicement, in thatthe aquisition of « working Knowledge ofa
in to fara there abs for gone
fhe in ei te fr rn phone doen ch
1 ie i as
: Faerie cee rsa”
ren 5 op
‘Ct mt i
1, The Indian Influence on Western Phonetics
Moreover the tink between the ancient Indian andthe modern
\Wontcn schol of linguini comideraby eloer in phontiy
‘han im gestae For whit Pipinean techaiqucs are only just
heaning to bani the incu of Latin ramtar, our Phonetic
egris ad terminology ove more than is pethape generally
‘eal othe influence ofthe Sanakni¢ phonetics, The impact
Si Sir Witam Jones's aacovey" of Sanat on the course of
‘Wester fnguintis wel known; but Jones, apart from his now
Igraphy of Asati words i Roman Lets! the whole order
Treatment and decriive techie i clearly based on Ini
‘adele In «paper on "The English Schoo! of Phonetics Pro-
essr J, R. Fir ha sad of thin rest orctast,
‘hatte Ian grammar a boeican ham bended
soc mcmmended tt dc 2 age bar etch etary
The influence of the Indian works on the phonetic views of
Willa Dwight Whitney may be cee sen Inthe discussions
shed inthe Journal of the American Oriental Society during
the years 1862, subsequent upon the appearance of Lepsis's
Stindard Alphabet) and we have the fing that shout thei
teaching Whitney might oot have been in postion to express self=
Fight indigestion agua that other country from which he
‘a are 0 much
il ay mung wero he se she plone ple:
light of thar nati oe Germ ave banded oars ed
tcemiety ci dicen bere on rand son fond 8 and
rec
“The “seemingly obvious’ dtinction of voind and vacle here
‘i arn Lt To
gs kM Tne he Pad dane arectal weedy repel by ep ‘eed
fhe Sani grr
nd he a cc ein he woh fA.
Ea ec a Pa IV a he ly Bh Pro,
picefepct wt we made o Whe wet
‘snot works an abe hc own sere ec
ery pi. He apron cao fly
{the tet ns than Why a dans ea
‘aon ti dap ef es
7h at hy ol i a at ey eal
bce dint ens ome
AS yet however, the linguint cannot survey the Inn phonetic
sachivement without undertaking an extensive curse af reading,
of which only a certain proportion wil be relevant to ha parpoey
and on the ther hand, without having viewed the ever feme
ork ofthe Indio nai he can hardly anes inal dc
Sion. The principal works ave been trandited and cnmmented
‘upon (so fa 8 the phonetic climate othe tans’ cavironenee
Detmited) by auch Western scholars ax Whitney, Weber Reve
‘nd Max Miller, and more recently by Indian icky among
whom may be expecially mentioned M. D. Shs, 3. K. Saree
nd: Ghosh, An interesting selection of epee problems bas
been discmed in detail by Siddbeshwar Varms in hin Creal
‘Studi inthe Phonetic Observation of Tdion Grommarint, he
‘resent study ama at presenting a mstemate acount of Tndion
Bhinetc doctrine so frat appears to pomew mere than purely
0. The Sources
Of the works themselves it wll be sulicint to soe tha they
fal into two main eategorieg, the Prater and the Sib,
TE Se bt
seer aeearoan e eeaete
onise
Ta — pet
eo a
Ser rac Sens Reais
ea rete
darers — inom
=
See
ae eee aeeneae
Eevietang ce Panainne’ whee ye
Fateh tania utes
te ey Ra oe nt a i
pe area haces rare
Sree hated ns ee ie
Pepe rele Gia
shes arin in hy dea Var aes
CRs ec ais
lle ren ocean cour ae
Semgrest cats neces
fais eeneacacen sevens
Sa ee
eee ee
ee areas nan anaecel ass
Se Sera mare
Bieormncapes anette
aera
oS See
eee
a ta‘ PHONETICS IN ANCIENT INDIA
‘Mada; adits crest that nda, lke Erope, gam
‘aca writen vad theme of the bs profes) pets
‘vice rch ance aod nontce wots te Bale
‘map, Argyl, aod Upc we nd» marty
‘arou phanctc cupolas af mca,
tnt tcaie, semicoke nf
chica ooo) andi the White Yji-Vea ee pest
ian anatomical it aris etre which lng teeters
otc a ol pricey
fin els and pr the tongues hh
Feiely scited wih Sarat the fen of pert
“The shor ofthe phones wok are ttre prescriptive
ted Secrgive. Tie avowed purpose lst prose the er
{tation of he mace vx vo Ec the dr peas sre
Airstened for mprmuncade,fodig decent the lof
XKurbipdla? the competent pup, on the ae hand, et
couraged by vers sch ttt which cnet TP
“allethetnow the sini fan sd ea may go nwt
=f which he commentator irre a spying nto
inthis world br so i he pe However of oe
{ans were dary phoetiin rte tha staan ae
{canny coupled wh en shen ad etc metiode
logy eo ecpons wc mua erly have enced the
iil terme a ference
ora the scout ofthe vaiut shore Mena; we fd
ele divergences of pronucaton ar betvcn te ening
{nd the vent, nd we may sumine Gt these dearest
tanya rt scat dla fetus eorepending to he
icon of he several Sah or Ve col, Te meh nes
thee i nga ack origi dope, and the Sahar
nooverion >
refer to ach ther’ opinions ina commer objective mano.
Cerin prmncatin however, are general. rcoased ss
fey fd Tate of ach tus fe, In chap. iv ofthe RP) are
hardly lee itoing than dela a che approved. pos
“The Pritt have recived the actions of vats ater
commer In hte hehe of + ina
troy Gy eels to eogment end cit the cole
rey of the pions anfrarately, however thera ten
tf the tation ome in tany aves to hve Ben Tot sr he
Sennentan thar we psc haves habit of wrapping he root
{Geral bevel of cng Eiht on he nanraene icon
Hin in car te ca Sate of pret iy
tad undergone a marke deterioration Between the tie
{Teton were composed end the tine of our commen Ea
feral we may yey Set abe over where te aan
{fetue ave of shoogh nome mates ever Set cul ave
Ire frm thems and recent stay of modern do-Aryan
Iangage ha socesfly en that any of the ancient dvr
Chetechnigucr i al be employed to tdvntage’ ‘These ety
peat a ie eich ey thera
{he Middle Ager even he mi-tnetenth ety aed ay 8
tconmcnt wAEl he comers ed een Wien or Dlx
Miler hae fale to comprehend makes mmedte sms othe
‘hone today ‘The ane oetaningexepin othe general
{dry ofthe dian commentators vat hove tpt
{nwo the RPand ol the VP reve tegen elie:
lng appeach to eiey of phonetic
03. The Sanshrit Alphabet
‘Whit the satements with which we sal concerned are of
wide phonetic tres, even the ost general of them are of our
TNsed onthe deuripton of «paticulesnguage, namely Saraki.
esc este of‘rlye fr purposes of tex qution, te sundad Renan
‘eltrtion a the Devnet edna eye
‘ifet ec cn he on urine he lo
salt andthe orginal San lee fs pea
Ret, sented wo lott. Whar homeer Semler rey
ss soundacqucce ae made smite ported
‘emripion ned which doers in ee rope hts
sandal stem, and wich {ove found comes ae
ing of Start poets ach rnrpion ce pads heey
LEA. type, Inthe chat on p20 the eo cometion any
sie ty de Wher tare amps eee ee
‘indie by he we of ogee bao
I ld he stewed ath pe a,x fo eascrip
soapy the estan os compe arte by
Caer is bd crs monnpenicaatfers
shi prot, which har ees ben sped yey
‘modern ling ho favours exis ‘phone sree
th ras forming op nich spent ar sh
Indian themes fave done vo. Tes wae te Bese
seth of wring is lah, ht the nu under nd
‘