Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 37

Method study for process flow of

cement packing and dispatch

Done in Chettinad Cements Corporation Ltd


By,
K.Ramesh Kumar (06M640)
About the industry
Ø T h e C H E TT IN A D C E M E N T C O R P O R A T IO N LT D ( C C C L )
e sta b lish e d in 1 9 6 2 is lo ca te d a t a d ista n ce o f 2 5 km fro m
ka ru r.
Ø T h e p la n t p ro d u ctio n ca p a city – 2 0 0 0 to n s p e r d a y.

Products
Ø Chettinad Royal Grade – 53
Ø Chettinad Grade – 43
Ø Chettinad Super Grade – 53
Ø Sulphate Resistant Portland cement
Ø Chettinad Super Steel cement
Ø
Outline of the manufacturing process
Outline of the manufacturing process
Packing and dispatch unit
Roto packer
Method study

Ø Method Study is the systematic recording and critical


examination of existing and proposed ways of doing work
as a means of developing and applying easier and more
effective methods and reducing cost.
Ø Method study is mainly concerned with finding better
ways of doing work.


Objectives of method study

Ø To improve work methods and procedure.


Ø Develop the best sequence of doing work to have smooth
flow of work with minimum back tracking.
Ø Improve plant utilisation and material utilisation
Ø Elimination of waste and unproductive operations.
Ø Reduce the total manufacturing cost and the total cycle
time.
Steps involved in method study

SELECT: the job to be analyzed.


RECORD: all relevant facts about present method.
EXAMINE: the recorded facts critically.
DEVELOP: the most efficient and economic method.
DEFINE: the new method.
INSTALL: the defined method.
MAINTAIN: the newly installed method.
Selection of job

The process selected for the method study analysis was the
cement packing and dispatch in packer unit 1 of Chettinad
Cements Corporation Ltd.
The reasons for selecting the job are:
Ø The packing unit was not part of the plants central control
unit, so any changes done had no effect on the operation
of the plant.
Ø The packing unit was the major contributor to the high
inventory carrying cost of the plant.
Ø The layout of the unit lacked smooth work flow.
Ø There was frequent complaints from the worker regarding
the tiring work.
Recording the flow of work
The selected job is recorded using flow process chart using
the following symbols:

OPERATION

INSPECTION

TRANSPORTATION

DELAY

STORAGE
Flow process chart (Material type)
Time chart for material flow

Symbol Frequency Time

3 60min per truck

8 15min

2 12min

26min
2

1 2min
Flow process chart (Man type)
Time chart for worker

Symbol Frequency Time

8 25 min

7 12 min
Critical Examination

The inference taken from both charts :


Ø The delay time in the form of temporary cement storage
was found to be high.
Ø The time consumed in worker movement were non
productive.
Ø Idle time of machine was high.
Ø Lot of stress on worker due to repetitive movements.
Critical Examination

By careful examination it was found that the manual opening


and closing of the diverting head was the main cause for
machine idle time, delay in process and high worker
movement.

Suggestions:
Instead of having a manually operated diverting head,
automate the system by developing a pneumatic mechanism
for opening and closing of the diverting head and coupling it
with the main operation of the packing unit.
Development of a new method
The process flow was altered by redesigning the diverting
head assembly.
The elements of change in the new design are:
Ø   The material of the diverting head was selected as
structural steel ASTM- A36.
Ø The opening and closing of the diverting head was done
using a pneumatic cylinder.
Ø A new electromagnetic locking design was made
Development of a new method
Existing Design
Development of a new method
New design
The new process sequence
Ø The electromagnet near the closing side gets de-
energized, the diverting head gets unlocked.
Ø As soon as the lock is released the pneumatic cylinder
gets actuated and plunges the diverting head.
Ø The diverting head is opened .
Ø The electromagnet on the other side (i.e opening side)
gets energized thereby it attracts the armature
present in the diverting head and hence locking it.
Ø Once the electromagnet in the opening side gets de-
energized, the lock is released.
Ø The pneumatic cylinder gets actuated and plunges the
diverting head.
Ø The diverting head is closed.
Ø The closing side electromagnet gets energized and
hence locks the diverting head.


Magnetic lock
Ø A magnetic lock is a simple locking device that
consists of an electromagnet attached to the side
frame and an armature to the diverting head.
Ø The current passing through the electromagnet
attracts the armature plate holding the diverting
head shut.
•The reasons for choosing an electromagnetic lock is:

1. Easy to install
2. Quick operation
3. Ability to withstand high loads.
Selection of material

•The material selected was structural steel ASTM- A36


with yield strength of 250MPA and ultimate strength of
400MPA.
•The material was chosen due to the following reasons:

Ø Good strength against impact loads.


Ø The endurance limit to ultimate strength ratio is
high(0.5) so better resistance to fatigue failure.
Ø
Finite Element Analysis(FEA)

Ø Transient structural analysis is done using Ansys to


find the maximum stress developed.
Ø The structure subjected to a dynamic load of 490.5N
for 1000 cycles.
Ø The element type is selected as solid45.
Ø The material properties for structural steel ASTM- A36
is given as young's modulas = 200 GPA and Poisson
ratio = 0.32.
Ø Tetrahedral volume mesh with 5 nodes per element is
generated.
Finite Element Analysis(FEA)

• After meshing and applying loads



Finite Element Analysis(FEA)
• Nodal solution for displacement

Finite Element Analysis(FEA)
• Nodal solution for stress

Finite Element Analysis(FEA)
• From the finite element analysis
Ø The maximum stress is found to be 31.4MPA and it is
said to be below the yield strength of material (250
MPA).
Ø So the material will not undergo permanent
deformation when subjected to dynamic loading
thereby justifying its selection.

Design of pneumatic system

Ø A pneumatic system is developed for the automatic


opening and closing of the diverting head.

•A - Compressor B - Check valve


•C – Accumulator D - Directional control valve
•E – Actuator(cylinder)


Design of pneumatic system
• Calculation of system parameters 
 Theoretical force applied by the pneumatic piston (Ft)

 The actual force required (Fr)


 Load Ratio
 Acceleration force (Fa)


Design of pneumatic system
Ft = π * D2/4 * P (for forward stroke)

 Ft = π * (D2 – d2)/4 * P (for return stroke)
 Fr = weight of the diverting head (w)
 Load ratio = (Fr / Ft) * 100 %
•In practical load ratio must be 85% or lower.

 Acceleration Force (Fa) = (Ft) – (Fr)



Design of pneumatic system
Given: volume of diverting head = 9.75 *10^-3 m3

 Density of material of steel = 7800 kg/m3
 Weight of material = 746N
 Assuming pneumatic pressure of 5bar and load ratio of
80%.
•Load ratio = (Fr / Ft) * 100 %

•0.8 = (746/Ft); Ft = 933N

•Diameter of piston

 Ft = π * D2/4 * P
 933 = π * D2/4*5*10^5 ; D = 50 mm
 Acceleration Force (Fa) = (Ft) – (Fr)
 Fa = 933 – 746 = 187 N.
• The pneumatic system is designed by using a pneumatic
cylinder with piston diameter of 50 mm.
Time chart for material flow after
re-design:

Symbol Frequency Time Time reduced

3 60min per truck 0min

8 15min 0 min

2 12min 0 min

5min 21 min
2

1 2min 0 min
Time chart for worker after re-
design:
Time reduced
Symbol Frequency Time



 8 20 min 5 min


 7 3 min 9 min



 From both charts Delay time reduced by 80%
Operation time of worker reduced by 20%,
Transportation time of worker reduced by 75%.

Conclusion
 The project has successfully presented a method study
for the process flow of cement packing and
dispatch. For doing the method study packing unit 1
was chosen and all facts related to it were recorded
using a flow process chart both material type and
man type. The recorded data were critically
examined and suggestions were made to re-design
the diverting head assembly.
 After the re-design it was found that the delay time in
material flow reduced from 26 minutes to 5 minutes.
In the worker chart the time of operation of the
worker reduced from 25 minutes to 20 minutes and
time of movement of the worker reduced from 12
minutes to 3 minutes.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Ø I would like to express my sincere thanks to Mr. S.


Ponnusamy, Personnel Manager and Mr V.
Annadurai Chief General Manager Chettinad
Cement Corporation Ltd, for granting me the
permission to do my project.
Ø I also would like to express my gratitude to Mr.
Natrajan, General Manager of Instrumentation
CCL, for guiding me throughout the project.
Ø My sincere thanks to my project guides Mr. Giri chief
engineer, and Mr Mathi Arasan assistant
engineer.

REFERENCES

Ø Mayal W H, “Industrial Design for Engineers”


Ø Gavriel Salvendy, “Handbook of industrial engineering:
technology and operations”
Ø www.wikipedia.com
Ø Roto packer manual by Haver and Boecker
Ø www.chettinad.com
Ø www.team116.org
Ø Punmia and Jain A K, “Strength of Materials and Theory
of Structures”