Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
EVIDENCE TABLE
Name: Jared Hansen, OTS and Gifty Frimpong, OTS
Date: September 30, 2015
Focus Question: Do home modifications improve function in adults with physical disabilities?
Rationale for inclusion/exclusion criteria applied to determine which articles should be included in the evidence table:
Inclusion:
Articles published since 1999
Articles published in English
Involving physical disabilities
Peer reviewed
Intervention involved home modification
Intervention was within the scope of occupational therapy practice
Outcome focusing on function or performance
Level I, II, and III evidence (IV and V if no other evidence is found)
Exclusion:
Article not involving physical disabilities
Not peer reviewed
Articles not in English
Focus on fall prevention as main outcome
Qualitative studies
Articles without a clearly defined home modification
intervention
Presentations, conference proceedings, dissertations, and
theses
Author/
Year
Study
Objectives
Level/Design/
Subjects
Intervention and
Outcome Measures
Results
Brunnstrm,
Srensen,
Alsterstad,
& Sjstrand
(2004)
Level I
Intervention
Compared control group
receiving lighting
adjustment in kitchen,
hall, and bathroom to
intervention group
receiving additional
lighting adjustments in
the living room.
The effect of
significant effect on
ADL tasks
performed on the
working surface in
the kitchen (p = .03
& p = .04) for both
groups.
Randomized Control
Trial (RCT)
Participants
N = 56 participants in
five diagnostic groups:
macular degeneration,
retinitis pigmentosa,
glaucoma, and other
Outcome Measures
ADL and perceived
quality of life based
on three interview
questions.
Study
Limitations
Small sample
size
Limited
generalizability
due to
representation of
group studied
Limited validity
and reliability of
studied variables
Implications for OT
The Clinical and
Community-Based
Practice of OT:
Implementing lighting
adaptations can increase
quality of life and ADL
performance in clients
aging with visual
impairments.
Program Development:
Knowledge of these results
can assist in the choice of
assessments that include
visual acuity and quality of
life.
Societal Needs:
Results demonstrate an
increase in quality of life
and improvement in ADL
performance for
individuals obtaining
lighting adaptations.
Healthcare Delivery and
Policy:
Results can promote early
identification of needs and
referral for home
modifications.
Education and Training of
OT Students:
Strategies for assessing
lighting and task
performance should be
included in entry level
Fnge, &
Iwarsson
(2005)
To investigate
longitudinal
changes in ADL
dependence and
aspects of usability
in housing among
clients receiving
housing adaptation
grants in Sweden.
Level III
Before and after design
Participants
N = 131 adults that
requested home
modifications
Intervention
Housing adaptations to
hygiene facilities,
entrances, floors, balcony
and patios, stairways, and
doors were made and
followed up on at two to
three months and at six to
seven months.
Outcome Measures
ADL Staircase
Usability in My
Home (UIMH)
Overall ADL
dependence did not
change significantly
whereas dependence
in Bathing
decreased over time
(p = .002). Activity
aspects (p = .045)
and Personal and
social aspects (p =
.008) of usability
improved at
different phases in
the process.
Small sample
size
Gender
differences
between followup times due to
drop-outs
Mobility devices
prescribed
during study
Lack of
comprehensive
home
modification
intervention
adaptations with
installation and
reimbursement of the
modifications.
Education and Training of
OT Students:
Students should
understand the importance
of making appropriate
suggestions for home
modifications that
individuals will utilize.
Gitlin,
Miller, &
Boyce
(1999)
To evaluate if
clients improved in
self-care,
encountered
difficulties using
adaptive
equipment, or
continued to use the
equipment
provided.
Level III
Before and after design
Participants
N = 34 adults, primarily
African American
females
Intervention
Two home visits were
conducted. The first
consisted of an initial OT
visit followed by
equipment
recommendations. These
recommendations were
followed by installation
of specific equipment.
The second visit was
performed three months
after the initial visit and
included a re-evaluation
of participants and
instruction in self-care
techniques.
Participants
demonstrated
significant
improvement in
bathing (t = 2.65, p
< .01), ADL
performance (t =
3.01, p < .01), and
transferring (t =
Outcome Measure
Katz ADL Index
Assessments of home
modifications may need
the skill of an OT with
specialized knowledge of
compensatory strategies
that are beneficial to
clients.
Healthcare Delivery and
Policy:
Results demonstrate the
importance of funding for
community programs, and
a system of quality control
in service delivery and
consistency of practices in
home modification.
Education and Training of
OT Students:
Home modifications
should be a part of entry
level OT education with an
understanding of the desire
of older adults to age in
place.
Mann,
Ottenbacher,
Fraas,
Tomita, &
To evaluate the
impact of assistive
technology and
home modification
Level I
RCT
Intervention
A comprehensive
functional assessment by
an occupational therapist,
Both groups
demonstrated a
decline in functional
status. The control
Potential
volunteer bias
Granger
(1999)
services on the
independence and
healthcare costs of
frail older adults.
Participants
N = 104 older adults
Mean age: 73 years
recommendations for
assistive technology and
environmental
interventions, and a
follow-up assessment.
Outcome Measures
Functional
Independence
Measure (FIM)
Older Americans
Research and
Services Center
Instrument
Craig Handicap
Assessment and
Reporting Technique
(CHART)
Functional Status
Index
group had a
significantly greater
decline in
independence (p =
.01) and increase in
pain (p = .01) than
the intervention
group. The control
group also had a
significantly greater
amount (d = .56) of
expenditure for
healthcare.
Intervention
group not
blinded
Possible cointervention bias
Petersson,
Kottorp,
Bergstrm,
& Lilja
(2009)
To investigate the
effects of home
modifications on
the performance of
everyday life tasks
for individuals with
disabilities.
Level II
Quasi-Experimental
pretest posttest design
Participants
N = 103 adults with
disabilities
Intervention
Home modifications
were completed as
needed.
Outcome Measures
The Swedish version
of the ClientClinician Assessment
Protocol (C-CAP)
Participants
receiving home
modifications
experienced
significantly less
difficulties (p =
.023) in everyday
life up to six months
after installation
compared to the
control group.
Lack of
randomization
Uneven group
sizes
Large attrition
rate
Small control
group
Petersson,
Lilja,
Hammel, &
Kottorp
(2008)
To examine the
impact of home
modifications on
self-rated ability in
daily life for people
aging with
disabilities.
Level II
Cohort
Participants
N = 114 adults over age
40 that requested home
modifications
Intervention
The intervention group
comprised individuals
recruited from a pool of
applicants to the Agency
for Home Modification
(AHM) who had been
approved and were
scheduled to receive
home modifications
within four weeks. The
Significant
differences were
found between
baseline and followup in self-rated
difficulty (d = .32, p
= .001) and safety (d
= .40, p = .001) for
the intervention
group, indicating
that they felt safer
Small sample
size
Researchers not
blind to group
assignment
Potential
volunteer bias
Limited validity
and reliability of
outcome
measures
Stark (2004)
This study
examined the
efficacy of a home
modification
intervention
program on selfreported
occupational
performance in
older adults with
disabilities.
Level III
Before and after design
Participants
N = 29 private home
owners identified by a
not-for-profit agency
Intervention
Home modifications
were provided, including
adaptive equipment,
architectural
modifications, and major
home renovations. No
remedial interventions
were provided. All
intervention
modifications addressed
occupational
performance issues. The
modifications were
provided by the agency
and the occupational
therapist provided
training in the use of the
modifications and made
follow-up visits as
needed. Photographs
were taken to verify the
changes that were made.
Outcome Measures
FIM
Canadian
Occupational
Performance
Measure (COPM)
Enviro-FIM
Only 45 of 75
identified barriers
were completed by
the agency. The
COPM was used to
identify differences
between pretest and
posttest scores of
performance and
satisfaction. Paired
t tests were used to
examine the scores.
A mean satisfaction
score of 2.25 at
pretest increased
significantly to 7.69
at posttest (t = -9.54;
p = .0001), while
the mean
performance score
increased
significantly from
3.19 at pretest to
7.81 at posttest (t =
-8.23; p = .0001).
Participants may
not represent
general
population
Limited number
of needed
modifications
identified were
completed
Half of
participants
received
additional
services limiting
ability to
conclude that
results were
from
modifications
Objective
measures only
used at baseline
Stark,
Landsbaum,
Palmer,
Somerville,
& Morris
(2009)
To describe a
client-centered
occupational
therapy, home
modification
intervention
program and
examine the impact
of the intervention
on daily activity
performance over
time.
Level III
Quasi-Experimental,
single group
prospective study
Participants
N = 80 adults over the
age of 60
Intervention
The intervention included
home modifications,
adaptive equipment,
architectural
modifications, and major
home renovations.
Training in the use of the
adaptations was provided
by the occupational
therapist. Clientcenteredness was
preserved by focusing on
the barriers the client
identified with the chosen
solution.
Outcome Measures
FIM
COPM
Participants had a
significant increase
from baseline to
posttest in
satisfaction (p <
.0001), performance
(p < .0001), and
functional
independence (p <
.0001), and a
significant decrease
in the influence of
environmental
barriers (p < .0001)
on the person.
Small sample
size
A single rater
who was also the
treating therapist
may have led to
measurement
bias
No control group
engaging in meaningful
occupations and activities.
Healthcare Delivery and
Policy:
With the increase in older
adults aging in place and
the growing burden on the
healthcare services, a
possible solution may be to
compensate for functional
loss by providing
environmental supports
through home
modifications.
Education and Training of
OT Students:
Educating students on
concepts of personenvironment fit is key in
understanding the potential
of the benefits of home
modifications.
Tomita,
Mann,
Stanton,
Tomita, &
Sundar
(2007)
Evaluate the
effectiveness of
smart home
technology in
improving
functional
Level I
RCT
Participants
Intervention
Both groups received a
2.5-hr in home
assessment by an
occupational therapist or
nurse. The intervention
level as measured
by the FIM at the
High attrition
rate
Attention bias
Lack of
standardization
performance and
maintaining current
living situation.
group received
installation of and
training on a computer
and smart home
technology.
Outcome Measures
FIM
Duke Older
Americans Resources
and Services
Procedures (OARS)
IADL
Sickness Impact
Profile (SIP)
Craig Handicap
Assessment and
Reporting Technique
(CHART)
Mini-Mental State
Examination
(MMSE)
Lack of
reliability in
outcome tools
Statistical
difference in age
between groups
independence of adults
aging with a disability.
Program Development:
Knowledge of these results
could assist programs to
educate older adults in the
use of computers and
smart home technology to
maintain independent
living.
Societal Needs:
Results suggest the
benefits of educating
adults on the availability,
use, and benefits of smart
home technology for
independent living.
Healthcare Delivery and
Policy:
Smart home technology
should be offered as an
additional form of home
modification to enhance
independent living.
Education and Training of
OT Students:
Students should be
introduced to smart home
technology as a possible
home modification
technique.
Refinement, Revision, and
Advancement of Factual
Knowledge or Theory:
Wilson,
Mitchell,
Kemp,
Adkins, &
Mann
(2009)
To determine
whether the
appropriate use of
an assistive
technology (AT)
intervention
program including
AT devices, home
modifications, and
environmental and
behavioral changes
for people aging
with an early-onset
disability improves
function and
reduces the rate of
functional decline.
Level I
RCT
Participants
N = 107 adults with
impairments that
included polio, spinal
cord injury, rheumatoid
arthritis, cerebral palsy,
stroke, and peripheral
neuropathy
Intervention
The treatment group
received a functional
evaluation and needs
assessment in the
participants homes.
Recommendations for
AT devices or home
modifications were made
and provided, and
training provided for
using the modifications.
The control group also
received a functional
evaluation in homes of
the participants but
received no AT devices
or home modifications.
Outcome Measures
OARS
FIM
At both the 12
Small sample
size
Inability to
control for
access to home
modifications by
control group
Additional research is
needed in determining
specific implications of
utilizing smart home
technology for improving
functional performance.
The Clinical and
Community-Based
Practice of OT:
Home modifications can
assists in maintaining
functional independence in
adults with physical
impairments.
Program Development:
Specific areas of the home,
such as bathrooms, should
be the focus of home
modification programs
because of their assistance
in improving function in
adults with disabilities.
Societal Needs:
Home modifications can
offset the demand for
caregiver assistance in
adults with disabilities.
Healthcare Delivery and
Policy:
Results suggest that AT
devices and home
modifications should be
provided for individuals
with disabilities earlier in
the aging process.