Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
DATE ___10/13/15___
1.
TITLE OF LESSON: U4.L1 Anticipatory Set Real or Fake? (Evidence and Credibility)
2.
3.
4.
RESOURCES: Attach materials needed to implement the lesson - e.g., power point presentation, text, graphic organizer
Overhead projector
Power Point: 1.1 Anticipation Real or Fake
Student notebooks and writing utensils
W1. Write arguments to support claims in an analysis of substantive topics or texts, using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient
evidence.
6.
7.
BIG IDEA ADDRESSED/ENDURING UNDERSTANDING: Why this material is important to teach; how it fits in with the unit
This lesson is designed as an anticipatory set for a new expository reading/writing unit (Persuasive Arguments) to solicit interest
and to activate students schema on essential elements of persuasion: evidence and credibility.
8.
ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS: Open-ended, arguable questions that organize the purpose of learning
- What makes something believable or not?
- How can people be persuaded to believe something?
EVIDENCE OF LEARNING
9.
OBJECTIVE(S) OR LEARNING GOAL(S): Choose one: Cognitive, Affective, Psychomotor or Language Development
Students will be able to identify key elements of effective persuasion (evidence and credibility) by composing a written response
about what makes some topics more believable than others, and what it would take to persuade them to believe in something.
10. ASSESSMENT(S): Choose one: Diagnostic - entry level, Formative - progress-monitoring or Summative evaluative
After responding to survey questions (whether they believe that a variety of supernatural/controversial things are real or fake) and
engaging in class discussion, students will compose a written response that encourages them to explore the essential elements of
persuasion: Are some of these [topics] easier to believe than others? Why or why not? and What would it take to convince you
that any of these were real? Informal assessment of these responses will determine whether students link how believable a topic
is to evidence/credibility. If not, additional discussion to clarify this point will be necessary. Any examples they list in their responses
may be used in later lessons to serve as examples/illustrations.
Responses will be graded for participation credit with a check minus, check, or check plus according to the following rubric for
Content:
Check Minus
Check
Check Plus
(Below expectations/Incomplete)
(Meets emerging expectations)
(Exceeds emerging expectations)
Student has not directly responded to any Student has directly responded to all (or
Student has directly responded to all of
(or hardly any) of the elements in the
nearly all) of the elements of the prompt.
the elements of the prompt in some
prompt.
detail.
Response is on topic and shows
Response is off topic or too short to
evidence of some critical thinking.
Response is on topic and shows
display any evidence of critical thought.
evidence of deeper critical thinking
An attempt has been made to support
Response is not supported by any
their opinion with reasoning, though the
Their opinion(s) are supported by
reasoning.
reasoning may not be very clearly stated
reasoning that is clearly stated and fairly
or logically organized.
well organized.
Handwriting is illegible or
spelling/grammar mistakes are so severe Handwriting is legible and
Handwriting is legible and
that they significantly interfere with
spelling/grammar mistakes do not
spelling/grammar mistakes do not
meaning.
Student responses will be assessed for ELD learning targets as a diagnostic assessment based on the following rubric:
1
2
3
4
Below Emerging
Emerging
Expanding
Bridging
May express an opinion, but
Expresses an opinion and
Expresses an opinion and
Expresses an opinion and
does not justify it
justifies it using reasoning or
justifies it by making
justified it by making
some background knowledge.
connections between ideas
connections and distinctions
Uses no evidence/background
discussed in class and relevant
between ideas discussed in
knowledge, or some that is not
May not incorporate ideas
background
class and relevant background
related to the topic.
discussed in class.
knowledge/experience.
knowledge/experience.
Identifies persuasive
elements/methods.
Identifies persuasive
elements/methods.
3.
Input Modeling
10. Students will watch the teacher demonstrate how to hold
up the Real and Fake signs.
4.
4.
5.
Guided Practice
12. Teacher will move through the next six slides, pausing to
prompt students each time to indicate whether they
agree or disagree. Teacher will make mental note of any
topics that seem particularly controversial or have
surprising results to bring up during discussion. (10
minutes)
13. If time allows, teacher may pause to instigate brief class
discussion on any topics that students seem particularly
eager to address. Ask probing questions that do not pass
judgment like: Why do you believe it? Why dont you
5.
Guided Practice
12. Students will look at the pictures and read the text on
each of the slides, determine whether or not they believe
in it, and indicate their choice by holding up the
appropriate sign. Students may look around as they go to
see whether their classmates opinions echo or contradict
their own. (10 minutes)
13. Students can engage in brief class discussion when/if the
teacher pauses and asks questions. They might tell a
brief personal story or anecdote or back up their opinions
2.
State Objective
8. Students will see the first slide of the 1.1 Anticipation
Real or Fake power point come up on the overhead.
9.
Independent Practice
17. Teacher will instruct students to take the remaining class
time to respond to the prompt in writing on a separate
sheet of notebook paper, using any/all of the ideas
discussed as well as any ideas they come up with on
their own. (5 minutes)
7.
Closure/Beyond
18. Teacher will collect responses by having students pass
them forward in their rows.
19. Teacher will explain that over the course of this fourweek unit, we will exploring and eventually writing
persuasive arguments. Therefore, it is important to keep
in mind what is necessary for an argument to be
persuasive. (2 minutes)
Independent Practice
17. Students will respond to the writing prompts on a
separate sheet of paper. Students can refer to the list on
the whiteboard as needed. (5 minutes)
7.
Closure/Beyond
18. Students will pass their responses forward in their rows
to be collected.
19. Students will listen to the teacher explain the learning
objective for the four-week unit. They will think about
what is necessary for an argument to be persuasive. (2
minutes)
REFLECTION AFTER THE LESSON: Overall, how did the whole class achieve the learning goals? In particular, how did
your special needs and English learners achieve the learning goals? To what degree were your assessments helpful in
determining students understanding? To what degree did the lesson engage students? What did you do differently
from one class to the next? What will you do differently next time you teach this lesson?