Ive never experience a peer workshop truly, but I remember way
back when in middle school our teachers would often let students check other students work, primarily after we completed a rough draft of some sort. I wouldnt really consider that a peer workshop because the purpose wasnt to enhance another students writing, but to correct grammar and offer little tips of advice based on how we write ourselves. Now I have had teachers edit and revise my work numerous times, which I honestly felt like it helped me. I mean if the teacher offers advice and you follow it and implement what they suggested into your paper, it just made sense that you would end up getting a good grade, so thats why I liked it when my teachers would edit and revise my papers. At points I didnt like it however. Some times I felt as if my teachers were trying to not enhance my writing, but to alter/change my writing. Everyone has a different style to writing, and I felt that my teachers wanted us to write a certain way, like how they write. So when they would revise and edit my paper, I often saw them rewording paragraphs, and changing the flow of my writing. Another annoying thing was I usually couldnt read their suggestions because the teachers would try to cram comments in between each line of texts. Overall, I still enjoyed my teachers editing to some degree. Contrary to what I believed before, there is a distinct difference between editing and revising. Revising is more like changing the complex of your writing, like how your words flow, placements of ideas, and how things should correspond and go in a chronological order. Revising in my opinion should be done after your rough draft, because it makes no sense to basically finish up your paper, and then have the possibilities of having to alter a lot of substance in your paper. Editing deals more with the little conventions in your writing, like punctuation, grammar, spelling, and anything that would help lessen imperfections in your writing. Editing should be done when you are done revising, and are happy with the content of your writing. I want to implement a better use and understanding of critiquing students work. I feel like when I revise my peers work, or they revise mine, I dont want them to praise my writing too much, or to give a bland explanation on what I should do to make my writing better. For instance Straub stated you need to express what you like and dislike without being critical (Straub 140), and I plan on implementing that as well as students implementing that to my writing. I also liked where he said you should ask real questions instead of simple ones. (Straub 141) That would really help me revise my work.