0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
42 vues4 pages
The current raging war in the Middle East has already taken over 200,000 lives. The war began with uprisings against the government that were answered by police brutality. Without these rights, how Americans' live their lives today would drastically change.
The current raging war in the Middle East has already taken over 200,000 lives. The war began with uprisings against the government that were answered by police brutality. Without these rights, how Americans' live their lives today would drastically change.
The current raging war in the Middle East has already taken over 200,000 lives. The war began with uprisings against the government that were answered by police brutality. Without these rights, how Americans' live their lives today would drastically change.
Contemporary Global Issues, Period 3 20 November 2015 The Voice of America The currently raging war taking place in the Middle East has already taken over 200,000 lives. In this war, shootings, artillery attacks, kidnappings, and toxic weapons are only some of the ways ones life could be ended at any moment (Yourish et al.). The war began with uprisings against the government that were answered by police brutality, which ultimately was stripping people of their right to assemble or voice their opinions. Then the fight eventually became a war of religion, meaning that people no longer had the freedom to worship whatever or whomever they wanted without fearing for their lives (Rodgers et al.). With all of this violence, light is shed on the importance of some of the crucial rights that every single person on earth is entitled to: the rights demanded by the United States Constitutions First Amendment. The First Amendment provides a few of the most important and complicated human rights. These rights include the freedom of speech, religion, press, peaceful assembly, and the right to petition the government ("U.S. Constitutional Amendments"). Without these rights, how Americans live their lives today would drastically change. The freedom of religion allows the people to have an opinion, a personal comfort, and the ability to voice themselves. The freedom of speech allows them to voice their opinions and their feelings, the freedom of press allows the ability to report both opinions and findings, while the freedom of peaceful assembly allows them to physically show their opinions. In addition, if they feel as though they are being threatened or are uncomfortable with the governmental law, they are able to petition these laws. Without these rights, humans, both individually and as a whole, lose part of themselves. They lose their ability to be unique.
Nguyen and Phelps 2
The First Amendment is still valid today but needs to be more clear and concise. With the increase in technology, including social media, it needs to be made clear as to how the First Amendment is applied in these instances. Some individuals unjustly claim the freedom of speech to account for their actions, while others are attacked for their views. Professor Robert Post claimed that the government has to rethink what counts as speech (Drum) so that it can still be valid in present times. The First Amendment includes the most important rights, which, due to their importance, causes them to be some of the most complicated rights there are. In order to cut down on the confusion, the First Amendment needs to be explained for the current times. Because the importance of the First Amendment cannot be matched, its power is sometimes abused. On June 30, 2015, Donald J. Trump and Miss Universe L.P. filed a $500 million lawsuit against a television network named Univision following its decline to broadcast the Miss USA and Miss Universe pageants after Trump made controversial remarks during a presidential campaign speech (Donald Trump). According to the suit, the networks motive was that it [did] not agree with Mr. Trumps longstanding views or statements, all of which are protected by the First Amendment (Donald Trump). This fallacy affects the right to freedom of speech unfavorably because Trumps ambition to sue is not backed up by the rights outlined in the amendment. The First Amendment states that Congress shall make no law (U.S. Constitutional Amendments) that suppresses ones freedom of speech; it does not claim that private companies have no right to censor ones words. In other words, the lawsuit is guilty of making a hasty generalization. It indirectly states that because Congress cannot abridge his freedom of speech, neither can anyone else, including Univision. Additionally, the company is protected by the freedom of the press, which allows them to refrain from televising anything they
Nguyen and Phelps 3
do not agree with. The only way Univision could be at fault is if its contract with Trump and Miss Universe promises that the pageant will be aired no matter what, which is unrelated to the First Amendment. The First Amendment allows humankind to be themselves and to voice their opinions. Because of the freedoms that it includes, it is the building block for the rest of human rights and many other happenings. The First Amendment is just one example of how, despite sometimes being used in the wrong way, basic freedoms are still very important to everyday life.
Nguyen and Phelps 4
Bibliography "Donald Trump and the First Amendment in His $500 Million Lawsuit." Constitution Daily. The National Constitution Center, 01 July 2015. Web. 19 Nov. 2015. Drum, Kevin. "First Amendment Law Is Facing Some Very Big Changes." Mother Jones. N.p., 17 Aug. 2015. Web. 20 Nov. 2015. Rodgers, Lucy, David Gritten, James Offer, and Patrick Asare. "Syria: The Story of the Conflict." BBC News. BBC, 9 Oct. 2015. Web. 19 Nov. 2015. "The 6 Best and Worst Countries for Religious Freedom." LDS. N.p., 22 Apr. 2015. Web. 20 Nov. 2015. "U.S. Constitutional Amendments." Findlaw. N.p., n.d. Web. 19 Nov. 2015. Yourish, Karen, K.K. Rebecca Lai, and Derek Watkins. "How Syrians Are Dying." The New York Times. The New York Times, 13 Sept. 2015. Web. 19 Nov. 2015.