Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
instructor:
phone [personal]:
phone [office]:
office:
office hours:
course theme
To ground the students investigations for the semester, the course will focus on a particular formative
theme. The theme of this section is The Bad Guys, which is a rad and catchy way to explain that well
be thinking through the difference between the licit and the illicit. As well be approaching this from an
anthropological perspective, we will be particularly interested in the social and institutional processes
and beliefs that maintain the border between the licit and the illicit, and how prohibition-infused events,
circulations, and spaces can be approached theoretically and ethnographically.
To speak of things illicit raises questions that we, as humans living around other humans, are very
familiar with: Who do we trust? Why? Who, on the other hand, is a bad guy? A potential enemy? The
ultimate Other? How can we tell? How did they become bad guys? And, furthermore, what should we
do with them?
Just about everyone we meet has something to say about these questions. To ask them in the classroom,
however, means to slow them down, and tease out why and how particular answers to them circulate
and to what effect. To speak about these concerns anthropologically means to confront common sense
understandings of behaviors, characteristics, goods, and beliefs that are considered transgressive. It
often also means to speak about them using a different language. For example, many things that are
illicit are also illegal, but not all of them. Many things that are technically legal, are definitely not licit.
[tip- if you have a question related to APA, check out the resources available to you on Sakai, try OWL
Purdue next, and shoot your instructor an email if you are still in need of an answer]
93-100
90-92
87-89
83-86
80-82
77-79
930-1000
900-929
870-899
830-869
800-829
770-799
C
CD+
D
DE
2.0
1.67
1.33
1.0
0.67
0.00
73-76
70-72
67-69
63-66
60-62
0-59
730-769
700-729
670-699
630-669
600-629
0-599
The University Writing Requirement (WR) ensures students both maintain their fluency in writing and use
writing as a tool to facilitate learning. Course grades now have two components. To receive writing
credit, a student must receive a grade of C or higher and a satisfactory completion of the writing
component of the course. To receive the 6,000-word University Writing Requirement credit (E6), papers
must meet minimum word requirements totaling 6000 words. Any assignment not reaching minimum
word count will be returned or failed.
The instructor will evaluate and provide feedback on the student's written assignments with respect to
content, organization and coherence, argument and support, style, clarity, grammar, punctuation, and
mechanics. Conferring credit for the University Writing Requirement, this course requires that papers
conform to the following assessment rubric. More specific rubrics and guidelines applicable to individual
assignments may be delivered during the course of the semester.
UNSATISFACTORY (N)
STYLE
MECHANICS
CONTENT
Week 6
September 29-October 3
M- Discuss Heroes and Hooligans. Summarizing/Paraphrasing.
HW Read- Bourgois (10)
W Discuss reading. Common Writing Concerns. Style Lesson 4
HW- TBA
F- Writing workshop- drafting a thesis and outline.
HW- work on paper. Read Reading 11.
Week 7:
October 6-October 10
All Homework TBA
M Discuss Style Lesson 4; Paper planning
HW Style Lesson 5. Drafting the paper
W Writing Workshop- effective revising.
HW finish draft
F- Peer Review
HW Check out and address necessary revisions. View The House I Live In.
Reading 12: Screen The House I Live In.
Week 8: Gathering and Using Evidence
All Homework TBA
October 13-15
Draft Due
Peer Review?
Participation Challenge
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Critical Definition
Critical Analysis
Application of Theory
Final Portfolio
Total Points
1. InstaBADGUYS
Create and curate an Instagram feed during the course of the semester. Follow my ENC course account,
ENC_2014 so I can follow you back. Ill post things, too, and tag them with #ENC2305 or #badguys. Take, edit,
share and tag photos as you wish, as you feel they relate to many minor or major ideas, themes, concepts that we
touch on (even lightly) in the course. Discover what interests you as you post. Share things that just feel
appropriate for the feed and then analyze your choices later, if you like. Reflect in April as you write your written
analysis. Think of your feed as a textsomething produced by someone in a particular context or set of contexts.
Comment on trends in your feed, why you posted particular images, how you edited them and why, how you
tagged them. Speak about a few posts in further detail. Be thoughtful and self-reflexive in your write up.
2. The Mixtape
This challenge provides you the opportunity for you to curate your own music compilation. The content of this
compilation should relate to a theme we discussed or listed in our critical glossary wiki. In your liner note (the
written component) you will state what theme or genre you engage and why. It consists of your commentary and
analysis of a few of the musical materials that you have selected and why youve selected them. Perhaps the
playlist relates to a period or event, an existing emotional narrative, genre, canon, place, time, etc. Something you
want to work out for yourself about prohibition, appetite, regulation, law, taboo. Or, perhaps a list of songs that
all mention a particular item, event, person, or circumstance. Be thoughtful, reflect. Your playlist can be made
using Spotify, a YouTube playlist, a DropBox folder, or be made on a physical medium if you would like. Just make
sure you can make it available to me.
3. The Outlaw Hero
Choose a film, short story, novel, television show or other cultural text in which you feel the figure of the
bandit/outlaw hero is present. Why is/was this particular character or set of characters that are considered
"criminal" by authorities considered honorable, moral men (or women) by their communities in different times
and places? What might this say about the interaction between of the state, cultural ideas of justice, and crime?
Why did this hero appear when s/he did? How can we compare a community's lifting of individual "criminal"
men to heroic heights with its "criminalization" of other types, as discussed in our classes? Why are some
individuals criminalized, and others somehow rewarded for what one could argue is illicit behavior? Analyze the
outlaw hero in his or her context.