Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Taylor Buckmaster
Unacceptable
Design needs attention and portfolio shows
limited organization. Inappropriate color,
format, font, photos and links do not work
Acceptable
Design is creative and professional with
all required elements present and
obvious.
Appropriate, color, format, font, photos
and workable links
There are NO mechanical errors
evident.
Autobiography
Resume
Resume is present
Training/Session/Seminar Plan
Training/Session/Seminar Plan is
present
Comments:
Circle One
Acceptable
Unacceptable
Acceptable
Unacceptable
Acceptable
Unacceptable
A lot of
improvement
made one error
evident. See
feedback to the
left.
Acceptable
Unacceptable
A lot of
grammatical
errors
throughout. (see
comments
section)
Present
Not Present
Present
Not Present
Standard 2
Collaboration:
Standard 3
Professional Knowledge:
The health
promoter understands the central concepts, tools of inquiry,
and structures of health promotion and creates learning
experiences that make specific aspects of health promotion
meaningful to the client.
Acceptable
Unacceptable
__Reflection
__Alignment
__Work Sample
Acceptable
Unacceptable
X_Reflection
X__Alignment
__Work Sample
inquiry etc
Instead you are just giving a summary of what your seminar plan
covers. Be meaningful and specific in the three questions and then
STOP!
Significant improvement made!
Comments:
Standard 4
Standard 5
Leadership:
Standard 6
Acceptable
Unacceptable
__Reflection
__Alignment
_Work Sample
Comments:
Acceptable
Unacceptable
__Reflection
__Alignment
__Work Sample
Reflection:
Acceptable
Unacceptable
__Reflection
__Alignment
__Work Sample
Communication:
Standard 7
Acceptable
Unacceptable
__Reflection
__Alignment
__Work Sample
Comments:
Acceptable
Unacceptable
__Reflection
__Alignment
__Work Sample
Training/Session/Seminar Plans
Comments
Comments
Present
Not Present
Acceptable
Unacceptable
Acceptable
Unacceptable
Present
Not Present
Standard 8
Assessment:
If candidate receives any unacceptable rating or not present items, the candidate has not met minimum standards required for Admission to
Level II.
Date of Initial Review____4/23/15_______
__________Approved
____X____Not Approved
1st Evaluators Name ______Lisa Emendorfer_______
2nd Evaluators Name ______Scott Soja______________________
If portfolio does not meet minimal requirements, the deficiencies are noted in the comments section above and the revisions and a second review must be completed and
resubmitted and approved prior to Level II registration.
_____________
If portfolio does not meet minimal requirements, the deficiencies are noted in the comments section above and the revisions and a third review must be completed through the
HP coordinator prior to Level II registration.