Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Date: 11/19/15
School:
Windsor High School
Content Area:
ESS
Title: Grown vs mined
Page 1
Page 2
Anticipatory Set
The hook to grab students attention.
These are actions and statements by the
teacher to relate the experiences of the
students to the objectives of the lesson,
To put students into a receptive frame of
mind.
To focus student attention on the
lesson.
To create an organizing framework
for the ideas, principles, or
information that is to follow
(advanced organizers)
An anticipatory set is used any time a
different activity or new concept is to be
introduced.
Procedures
(Include a play-by-play account of what
students and teacher will do from the
minute they arrive to the minute they
leave your classroom. Indicate the length
of each segment of the lesson. List actual
(0-5 minutes)
Have students come inside to this warm up:
Using your prior knowledge decide, is nuclear energy a renewable
resource? How is that different from environmentally friendly?
(5-10 minutes)
Once everyone has settled down lead a quick class discussion over this
talking about uranium mining and sustainable vs low green house
emissions and the confusion.
Time: 90 minutes
Materials:
- Apples to Apples cards
- Graphic organizer
- paper for assessment
(10-35 minutes)
Go into lecture overview. This is the lecture they already took notes on
last night so bring up important points and interesting tidbits they
didnt know about.
(35-65 minutes) Have then play the apples to apples game with their
group mates. ***
Page 3
This game is modeled off of the game apples to apples. If nobody has
played this before well do a quick survey before playing and do a quick
overview led by students on how to play the game. After thats
established Ill explain how to play which is this:
The students are given two decks of cards. The larger deck contains
many resources that are used around the world like wool, aluminum,
salt, etc. These have a short description to clarify what I mean by it and
examples used in production ie. Clothing, soda cans, table salt.
The other pile contains categories like (Grown- most economic, minedmost sustainable, grown-least sustainable). One person in the group per
round will be the judge and theyll draw a category card. Theyll have
their group mates chose an example card that they think best fits the
category and the judge will judge the one that fits it the best and
provide a reasoning on their graphic organizer.
Students will be given a clear explanation of the purpose of playing this
game before they begin playing it.
Once the students have exhausted their deck theyll reshuffle,
redistribute and play again hoping that the cards will get dealt and
matched up differently.
This activity will use students prior knowledge of what they know about
sustainability and economics to categorize these different resources
into whether they were grown or mined and justify whether they think
its a sustainable resource.
(65-75)
After the game is done the students will complete their graphic
organizer which provides a bit of a reflection on the process and higher
level thinking questions. And will turn it in. Up there theyll grab an
index check to complete.
*** Groups will be chosen by numbers distributed. During the warm up I
will pass out the graphic organizers. At the top they will have a number
on them. There will be 5-6 per team so the organizers will have
Page 4
This lesson uses a lot of prior knowledge, but groups will be large
enough that the students should have a couple of people per group that
will know what theyre doing and will help guide them to understand.
Understanding the instructions might also be hard if theyve never
played apples to apples which is why theres so much explanation of
the rules at the beginning. But itll include the experts too so it
shouldnt be too boring.
The kids will have an opportunity to get loud with the game and have
fun with it which is its purpose, but I know when I play apples to apples
I tend to pick the card that is as far away from what it should be. Ill
have time to walk around while groups are playing to make sure that
type of playing isnt happening. Ill mention it in the rules too and thats
also why theyre recording the winners for the categories on their
Page 5
Assessment
How will you know if students met the
learning targets? Write a description of
what you were looking for in each
assessment.
Page 6
Page 7
while Im giving the presentation because you need a high energy level for
the kids to match so they dont just doze off while Im lecturing. I tried to
keep the kids involved with answering questions and the like but I totally
know where hes coming from. I think my energy level would have changed
for the afternoon classes for two reasons- 1) because its later in the day and
Im not so sleepy myself, and 2) I was so distracted thinking about how my
highly prepared and organized lesson is going to go that I have more room in
my brain to play with the things and keep the kids hooked. I think thats
something that just experience will give me the comfort to work on. But I
think thats also something in my personality, Im not an outwardly hilarious
or comedic person so Ill have to always be working on being boring.
But overall Im feeling so jazzed because this went totally well, to have
the kids so on point with the learning targets and have them enjoy being in
my classroom and doing higher level thinking was just so exciting!
Assessment Reflection
So what I was talking about above was a reflection I had the kids do on
the back page of the graphic organizer I had them turn in to help me with
changing up my lesson.
What I had them do after they were done with that was an informal
assessment piece. I never called it an assessment on purpose because I
didnt want kids to be freaking out about it, I really just wanted to see what
they retained and what they learned from the day.
I had on the top two definitions for mined resources and grown
resources then below I had four examples that they had to put for: 1) a
sustainably grown resource, 2) an unsustainably grown resource, 3) a mined
resource with a low environmental impact, and 4) a mined resource with a
high environmental impact
It was one point for each of these, the average was 4.8, the highest was 6
the lowest was 2. The median was 5 and the mode was a tie between 5 and
6. I feel like the kids had a hard time with remembering the definition of what
sustainable was so I helped them with that since that wasnt what I was
assessing- I was really assessing how they felt categorizing grown vs mined
resources and their capability of evaluating their acquisition and impact on
the earth.
I found that some didnt give an example, they just listed a definition
which I gave part points off because I wanted them to think of real life not
just abstract. Sometimes they put a mined resource for grown for the
unsustainable category so the kids had a hard time distinguishing that. But I
think they had a great higher level thinking for evaluating uranium.
I wish I had asked for a reasoning for the examples because sometimes
they put something that could fly but I wasnt sure if they were putting it
there for the write reasons.
I did provide feedback to the students on each paper so that they could
learn from their mistakes when I hand it back and clear up their
Colorado State University College of Health and Human Sciences
Page 8
misconceptions since we were really playing with their prior knowledge, and
the prior knowledge of their peers during this lesson.
Page 9