Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 1

Openingstatement:

GoodmorningYourHonor,ladiesandgentlemenofthejury:

Thiscaseisatragicexampleofwhatcangowrongwhenmarriedmenmixworkwithpleasure.Ataround3
a.m.onthemorningofApril3,2005,thedefendant,Mr.Freeman,struckandkilledthefamilysnanny,Nika
Mullerwhowebelievewasalsohismistressandpregnantwithhischildwithagolfclubinthegardenof
theirLaCanadahome.Wewillpresentcompellingphysicalevidencethatprovesbeyondareasonable
doubtthatthemurderweaponusedwasagolfclubfoundintheFreemansbackyard,thattheforceofthe
injuriesmusthavebeeninflictedbyanindividualwithameasureofstrength,andthatNikalayinthe
Freemansgardenforabout2hoursbeforeMr.FreemantransportedherbodyinthebackoftheirLexusRX
totheturnoutoffHighway2whereshewasfound,onlyminutesawayfromtheFreemanhome.Thedefense
mayattempttocastdoubtovertheirclientsguilt,offeringupapanoplyofpotentialalternatesuspectsto
muddythewaters.Theymightthrowoutsomeredherringsasevidencethatwhencarefullyexamined,have
littlebearingonthefactsofthecase.Buttheycanoffernoconvincingphysicalevidencethattiesany
suspectotherthanMr.Freemantothiscrime.Hehadthemeans,themotive,andtheopportunity,andatthe
conclusionofthiscase,youwillhavenochoicebuttorenderaverdictofguilty.

Closingstatement:

Ladiesandgentlemenofthejury:

Whenthistrialbegan,Iwarnedyouthatthedefensewouldtrytocastdoubtovertheirclientsguiltbylaying
theblameatthefeetofotherpossiblesuspects.Thankfully,theydidntmakemealiar.
ItstruethattheDNAresultsdonotlinkMr.Freemantothecrime.However,Imightremindthejurythatwe
wereunabletotesteverypieceofevidenceavailabletous.ImightalsoremindthejurythatDNAevidence
isnttheonlyevidenceneededtoconvict.

Thedefensehasofferedyounoactualphysicalevidencethatwouldsupportanyoftheiralternateversions
ofevents.We,ontheotherhand,presentedevidencethatplacesNikainthegardenatthetimeofher
death:theplantmaterialfoundinherhairthatisnotnativetothisareaandcanonlybecultivatedina
gardenthefungusinherlungsthatisonlyfoundincompostsoiltheconfettionherbuttocksthatmatches
theconfettifoundintheFreemansLexusandthedifferentlividitypatternsthatproveherbodywasmoved
aftershewaskilled.WevealsopresentedevidencethatprovesthegolfclubfoundontheFreemanproperty
wasthemurderweapon.WithnocrediblephysicalevidencetyinganyonebutMr.Freemantothiscrime,the
choiceisclearfindthedefendantguiltyascharged.

Rebuttal:

ThedefensehastriedtopositMrs.Freemanastherealkiller,andherhusbandasanunwittingaccomplice
afterthefact.ButwhileMrs.Freemanwasdefinitelyinvolvedincoveringupherhusbandscrime,the
testimonyyouveheardtodayshouldleaveyouwithnoquestionthattheforceoftheblowstoNikashead
andabdomenrequiredadegreeofstrengththatonlyMr.Freemanpossessed,andthestrengthneededto
moveNikasbodyintothecaranddumpheronthesideoftheroadwasjustnotavailabletoMrs.Freeman.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi