Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
The Buddhist teachings tell us that the cause of suffering is in fact craving or thirst
(tanha). The
Buddha described it as "the craving for sensual pleasure, the craving for continued
becoming, and
the craving for non-becoming." We are always looking for something to make us
happy and whole.
Even when we are prospering and growing and improving, we are constantly still
looking for
something else. We can never stay satisfied leading to our continual craving and
thus suffering.
The three forms of thirst listed above are the main causes of suffering according to
the Buddhist
teachings with the most obvious one being sensual pleasure. Relying on these
objects to achieve
happiness "only leads to frustration and dissatisfaction". Which ironically fuels the
craving for more
pleasure. The want for sensual pleasure can be self-centric which is something to
avoid because it
can result in bad karma. All sensual objects of desire are impermanent so one
cannot achieve
The second (thirst for becoming) and third (thirst for non-becoming) kind of thirst
contrast with each
other. The craving to become involves trying to get ahead in life socially and egocentrically. The
craving to not become is more to better yourself by doing what gets you ahead for
you and only
three forms and in understanding all suffering for that matter but sensual pleasure,
becoming, and
2 Mahayana schools:
1. Tantric Chenyan
2. Sanlun
The concept of emptiness according to the Sanlun school was debated. The
argument was that the
and the other ordinary reality of human experience on the other." There is but one
reality, namely,
one finds the objective world is emptiness; things in their suchness are empty of the
independence
arising. Emptiness can also be taken as the lack of any substantial difference
between
meditation. When you meditate, you empty your mind. You empty your mind so that
it can become
The philosophy of emptiness teaches that things are: dependent on their parts,
interrelated rather
than isolated, and that things are merely labelled. To prevent misunderstanding, one
must avoid
the two extremes. Which are that things are permanent, independent to their parts,
and
independent of our labeling and secondly, that things do not exist at all (nihilism),
thus emptiness.
phenomena are empty" is not the case but that "all phenomena in their own being
are empty."
Early Buddhism, or Pre-Buddhism lasted until about 150 years after the Buddha's
death. Its two
early schools that it was split up into were the Sthavira school and the
Mahasamghika school.
Mahayana teaching was the more popular in early Buddhism. A major doctrine in
early Indian
Buddhism that was forced for change was unintentional literalism. Earlier versions
of Buddhism
were somewhat intertwined with Hinduism because that was the leading religion in
India at the
time.
Tibet was one of the last places to have Buddhism spread to them. They of course
created their
own form of it to fit their culture and accustom to their known beliefs. Tibetan form
was more into
worshipping a guru. The guru is given the name lama. A big part of Tibetan
Buddhism is
meditation. They are fond of quoting sutra to the effect that one should test the
Buddha's words
Understanding the basic backgrounds and beliefs of each helps you to understand
the differences
between the two. Some of the differences present are their most common schools,
how devoted
and trusting each one is, and how much they tie with other beliefs or religions.
Tibetan Buddhism is
also newer, possessing more modern beliefs. Vajrayana is the main practice in
Tibetan Buddhism
while Early Indian Buddhism was focused on Mahayana. Tibetan Buddhism, like
almost all forms of
Buddhism, did derive from Early Indian Buddhism so they do have similarities but
they both have
their own take on the belief and are incorporating different cultures so will also be
very different as
they are.
1. Anicca
2. Dukkha
3. Anatta
The law of Dukkha is usually considered in relation to the human situation, and here
sense that it constitutes the first of the four noble truths. Dukkha states that all
complexes of
impermanent, that is subject to change is Dukkha. The saying 'all good things come
to an end'
applies here. All great things and successes fade. It is okay to enjoy them, the goal
is to not cling to
everything else.
The Dukkha we experience in life is not is not a punishment for wrong-doing, rather
it is the result
of our search for happiness or pleasure in what is not capable of reliably providing
it. Because
or Dukkha. The Buddha did not offer a magical cure for Dukkha, he did however
point out that
everything arises because of causes. When the cause is eliminated, so is the effect.
The eight-fold
path is the practical solution for a person to develop the wisdom which will enable
them to gradually