Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Contents
Aim................................................................................................................. 2
Shear Force Test............................................................................................. 3
Apparatus.................................................................................................... 3
Procedure.................................................................................................... 3
Calculations................................................................................................. 3
Graph.......................................................................................................... 6
Results........................................................................................................ 6
Discussion................................................................................................... 7
Conclusion................................................................................................... 7
Bending Moment Test..................................................................................... 7
Apparatus.................................................................................................... 8
Procedure.................................................................................................... 8
Calculations................................................................................................. 8
Graph........................................................................................................ 10
Results...................................................................................................... 10
Discussion................................................................................................. 11
Deflection of Beams..................................................................................... 11
Apparatus.................................................................................................. 11
Procedure.................................................................................................. 11
Calculation................................................................................................ 12
Graph........................................................................................................ 14
Results...................................................................................................... 14
Discussion................................................................................................. 15
Conclusion................................................................................................. 15
Strut Apparatus Test..................................................................................... 16
Apparatus.................................................................................................. 16
Procedure.................................................................................................. 16
Calculations............................................................................................... 16
Graph........................................................................................................ 17
Results...................................................................................................... 17
Discussion................................................................................................. 18
1 | Page
2 | Page
Aim
The aim of the report is to understand the concept of structural engineering and how it
is applied in laboratory exercises. The experiments carried out help to explain the
stress, shear, axial forces, bending and deflection properties. The different tests
performed at the laboratory helped to learn the health and safety issues involved. The
experiment was carried out in the structural engineering laboratory on the 8th of
November, 2011 at 10am. The following experiments were carried out:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Shear Force
Bending Moment
Deflection Beams
Strut Apparatus
3 | Page
4 | Page
When load = 5N
(Va x 5) + (5 x 300) (Vb x 950) = 0
5Va + 1500 950Vb = 0
Va =
(950 V b 1500)
5
Va = 190Vb 300
Va + Vb - 5 = 0
190Vb 300 + Vb 5 = 0
191Vb = 305
Vb = 1.60
Va + Vb - 5 = 0
Va + 1.60 = 5
Va = 3.40
Fxx = va - load
Fxx = 3.40 5
Fxx = -1.60
6 | Page
Percentage of Error =
ExperimentalTheoretical
x 100
Theoretical
Percentage of Error =
1.45(1.60)
x 100
1.60
0.15
x 100
Percentage of Error = 1.60
Percentage of Error = 6.25%
Graph
Results
Load (N)
Load cell
reading, F (N)
5
10
15
20
25
theory (N)
(N)
-1.45
-1.605
-1.70
-1.85
-2.01
-1.60
-1.67
-1.79
-1.96
-2.18
-1.45
-1.605
-1.70
-1.85
-2.01
% Error
9.375%
3.892%
5.028%
5.612%
7.798%
Lx
L1
L
VA
VB
From the results, it can be noted that the load and shear force are inversely
proportional. This means that when the load is raised, the shear force decreases. For
example, when the load is 5N, the shear force is -1.45N, and when the load is raised to
15N, the shear force decreases to -1.70N.
It can also be noted that the theoretical shear force goes hand to hand with the
experimental shear force. It is a good sign as it shows the laboratory experiment was
8 | Page
Apparatus
A pair of simple supports
Special beam with a cut section
Set of Weights
Load hangars
Pen
Record Sheet
Procedure
To initiate this test, first connect the load cell to the digital indicator. Switch on the
indicator for ten minutes and then start taking the readings. Fix the knife edged
supports on the beam and screw them tightly to the base. Then, hang the load hangars
to the beam in desired distance from the left support. Place the digital indicator to zero.
Measure using the measuring tape the length, width and the thickness of the beam
9 | Page
L1
1
3
Lx
4
C =175mm
L
H = 0
VA
Ha = 0
V = 0
Va + Vb = 5
M = 0
The following equation has to be used to find Va & Vb.
(Va x load) + (5 x L1) + (Ha x 0) + (Vb x L) = 0
(Va x 5) + (5 x 300) + (Ha x 0) + (Vb x 900) = 0
5Va + 900Vb = -1500
Va = -300 - 180 Vb
To find Va and Vb
10 | P a g e
VB
Percentage error
Percentage of Error =
ExperimentalTheoretical
x 100
Theoretical
Percentage of Error =
717.5954.80
x 100
954.80
Percentage of Error =
237.30
x 100
954.80
11 | P a g e
Results
Load (N)
Load cell
Va
Vb
reading, F
5
10
15
20
25
(N)
(N-mm)
Experimental Theory (N)
4.1
4.65
6.55
7.04
7.54
= F * 175 (N)
717.5
813.75
1146.25
1232
1319.50
6.703
11.74
16.95
22.16
27.43
-1.703
-1.740
-1.95
-2.16
-2.43
954.8
926.6
1000.5
1074.4
1183.7
12 | P a g e
% Error
24.9%
12.2%
14.57%
14.67%
11.47%
Deflection of Beams
The intention of the following test is to determine the deflection of a simply supported
beam.
Apparatus
A Pair of Pinned Support
A Dial Gauge with 0.01mm accuracy for measuring deflection
Beam specimen
Pen
Record Sheet
Procedure
The methodology involved in this experiment is as follows:
13 | P a g e
Calculation
Length of Member = 660mm
Width of Specimen = 24mm
Depth of Specimen = 5mm
14 | P a g e
bd
12
I=
bd
12
I=
25 x 5
12
I = 260.42mm4
Deflection =
wl
48 EI
Deflection =
5 x 660
48 x ( 200000 ) x 260.42
Deflection = 0.575
Percentage error
Percentage of Error =
ExperimentalTheoretical
x 100
Theoretical
Percentage of Error =
0.500.575
x 100
0.575
Percentage of Error =
0.0750
x 100
0.575
15 | P a g e
Results
Applied Load
(N)
Deflection (mm)
Experimental Deflection
% Error
Theory
Deflection
(mm)
5
10
15
20
25
div
50
112
168
233
288
mm
0.50
1.12
1.68
2.33
2.88
0.575
1.15
1.725
2.30
2.875
13%
2.61%
2.61%
1.30%
0.17%
Discussion
From the results, it can be seen that the load and deflection are directly proportional.
As the load is raised, the deflection also increases. Vice versa, when the load is
removed, the deflection decreases as well.
It can also be noted that the theoretical deflection is lower than the experimental
deflection. This can be due to the errors committed during the lab work as well as the
effect of limiting factors such as inaccuracy of readings for more than two decimal
places.
The percentage error is high and it proves that the experiment wasnt done as
cautiously as it should be. The theoretical value is very low in relation to the
experimental values.
The error can be observed in deflection when the load was being removed as it has a
0.3mm reading when no load is placed. This could be due to the zero error which
means that the arrow was not placed to zero before the experiment began or it could
be due to some defects in the apparatus. It could also be due to air pressure.
(Frank Durka and Hassan al Nageim, 2003)
Conclusion
The conclusion to this report is that the deflection and load are directly proportional and
deflection increases as greater load is placed on the beam. The slope of the graph is
steep and it increases sharply when the load is placed in mid-span. But when the load
position is on the sides of the beam, then the graph doesnt have a steep slope.
Errors can never be ignored when it comes to laboratory work. The aim is to reduce the
error as much as possible to obtain accuracy in work. Ways to reduce the error are by
repeating the experiment for three times or more and then taking the average readings,
by being extra cautious during the experiment, by asking more than one person to
record the readings and carry out the experiment, etc.
17 | P a g e
bd
12
Where:
E stands for Elastic Modulus
18 | P a g e
EI
L
I=
bd
12
I=
25 x 2. 58
12
I = 35.8mm4
EI
L
200000
19 | P a g e
Results
Load (N)
Deflection
div
5
10
15
20
25
Deflection/Loa
mm
19
0.19
40
0.40
70
0.70
119
1.19
168
1.68
Table 4: Readings for Strut Apparatus
d (mm)
0.038
0.040
0.047
0.0595
0.0672
Discussion
From the table above, it can be observed that the load and deflection are directly
proportional. As the load increases so does the deflection. But since this is the strut
20 | P a g e
Recommendation
Recommendations for fellow students who are going to do this experiment are to
repeat the experiment more than once so that the average reading can be taken which
is more accurate. Ask more than one class mate to record the readings to avoid errors.
Also, while performing the experiment, more than one class mate should carry out the
21 | P a g e
References
Paul S. Smith (2001) Introduction to Structural Mechanics. USA: Palgrave, Inc. pp 23132
Frank Durka and Hassan Al Nageim (2003) Structural Mechanics: loads, analysis,
design and materials. 6th edn. UK: Prentice Hall. pp 45-65
Michael R. Lindeburg (2011) Civil Engineering Reference for the PE Exam. 12th edn.
PPI2PASS. pp 125-300
Appendix
Figure 5: Student turning the strut apparatus knob to 5N to record the readings
22 | P a g e
23 | P a g e