Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Candidate Number:
Centre:
Centre Number:
LSA 4
Skills Assignment
Page Number
1.3 Turn-taking
1.4 Hesitation Strategies
2.1.1 Conversation
3.1 Buying Time using Hesitation Devices: Fillers, Vague Language and
Repetition
Bibliography
10
Appendices
11
Robert McCaul
Introduction
1.1 Why I chose to focus on speaking for FCE?
As a teacher who prepares students to take the FCE and as a Cambridge Examiner for
the same, I am overtly aware of the need to make the students speech more naturalsounding. Moreover, students often ask for more speaking in class and clearly it is
the most difficult skill to practise outside of class, especially for students who are
studying in their home countries. But which features of conversation are the most
useful to teach students in Speaking Exam preparation classes?
1.2 Why I chose to focus on Turn-taking and Hesitation Strategies?
1.3 Turn-taking
One of the four analytical criteria in paper 5 is interactive communication. The FCE
Teachers Handbook explains that to do well in this category candidates require an
ability to initiate and respond appropriately (UCLES:2008:86). While this ability may
come naturally in our L1, learners need to know how turn management rules are
realised in their L2. Burgess & Head agree that management of interaction needs to
be focused on in class (2005:112)
1.4 Hesitation Strategies
My own experience as a speaking examiner has shown me that students need practice
at using hesitation appropriately, particularly in Part 1 and 4 where it is very difficult
to predict the topic of the questions in advance. And inevitably, due to the real-time
nature of the exam, students are faced with having to react spontaneously to difficult
questions. This means that the ability to buy time to give yourself an opportunity to
think is crucial. Moreover, The FCE Teachers Handbook says that learners need to be
able to link utterances together to form coherent speech, without undue hesitation.
(UCLES:2008:86).
Robert McCaul
Analysis
2.1.1 Conversation:
Conversation can be defined as unplanned speech between two or more people
(McWhorter:2005:113) and as a consequence is much less tidy than planned speech,
even among educated speakers.
Conversation is spontaneous. Thornbury (2005:2) explains that because of the
contingent nature of speech, each utterance is dependent on the previous one. It is not
just simply an exchange of information where people speak in-turn. It is a matter of
people interrupting each other almost necessarily.
In conversation we are concerned just as much with verbal rituals, such as adjacency
pairs, as with conveying data and information. Thornbury (2005:66) describes it as
having a role of establishing and maintaining group solidarity.
In our L1s conversations usually proceed without hindrance as the participants are
aware of the subconscious rules. However, as the rules of conversation differ from one
language to the next, FCE Candidates need to be made consciously aware of how
English conversation operates in order to use it competently.
Other typical features of conversation include:
A. A speaker can select the next speaker explicitly (Appendix:2:22). The person
selected has the right and obligation to speak. Failure to do so in can result in
an awkward silence (McWhorter:2005:115).
B. If the current speaker does not select than the next speaker self-selects. The 1st
person to self-select has the floor (Appendix:2:41).
C. If neither of the above happens, then the current speaker can continue.
According to Sacks, Schegloff & Jefferson, B is by far the most frequently-occurring
turn-take. However, this is often done in an untidy fashion. Moreover, There are often
overlaps and simultaneous self-selections. Lack of over-lapping in native speakers
conversation is rare and is usually indicative of there being something wrong e.g. a
measure of hostility between speakers (McWhorter:2005:115). Overlaps are usually
slight and within each unit a speaker has exclusive rights and holds the floor.
There are strategies for maintaining the floor such as:
Avoiding eye-contact
Quickening Speed of speech
Using gestures or postures such as throwing your hands up in the air
Adhering to Grices Maxims i.e. making your contribution as informative as
required and no more, relevant and opportune and avoiding ambiguity
(Grice:2001:7)
Recognising when the other candidate has finished their turn will help students
achieve a better mark in the category of interactive communication where they are
expected to respond appropriately and maintain interaction.
(UCLES:2007:86).
Speakers can signal the end of their turn by prolonging the final stressed syllable,
dropping intonation (Appendix:2:40), using tags (Appendix:1:13), asking direct
questions (Appendix:1:56) and closing utterances syntactically (Appendix:2:61).
Candidates can also use certain discourse markers to indicate their intentions e.g.
Well, anyway (Appendix:4:1-7).
Candidates also need to look out for paralinguistic features such as their partners
leaning forward in their seats, raising their eyebrows and glances directed away from
them.
A key aspect of interaction is how conversational repairs are executed and how these
repairs illustrate the participants orientation to the rules of turn-taking
(Slade&Thornbury:2006:28). They can performed by the speaker clarifying what they
have just said (Appendix:3:4) or by asking the examiner/candidate for clarification
(Appendix:3:4). Candidates should use these strategies to maintain interaction
(UCLES:2008:86).
Robert McCaul
Robert McCaul
Robert McCaul
Cristina
Paolo
Music
over the
Centuries
Exhibition of
Kitchens
Cave Painting
Historical Films
Interactive
Computer
Programmes
20th Century
Fashion
Medieval Fair
Robert McCaul
Next, some more questions can be assigned to the learners to evaluate how well the
speakers interact and what the role of the interlocutor is in this part.
Listen to Paolo and Cristina doing this part of the test again and answer the
following questions:
1. Who starts the discussion and how?
_______________________________________________________________
____________________________
2. Who responds the most and how?
_______________________________________________________________
______________________________
3. Do they seem interested in each other and what they are saying?
_______________________________________________________________
______________________________
4. Do they look at the interlocutor? Is this a good thing?
_______________________________________________________________
______________________________
5. Does the interlocutor ask them questions during the task?
_______________________________________________________________
______________________________
6. Who speaks the most during Part 3?
_______________________________________________________________
______________________________
7. Do they take turns, or does one person dominate the discussion?
_______________________________________________________________
______________________________
8. Do they speak about all the pictures?
_______________________________________________________________
______________________________
9. Do they reach a joint decision? Does this matter?
_______________________________________________________________
______________________________
Robert McCaul
Then, the following task is used designed to raise the students awareness of which
other techniques can be used to manage interaction:
What do you think Cristina and Paolo could do to improve their performance in
this part of the test? Note down some language they could have used to do the
following:
Language to:
Turn-take
Initiate discussion
Ask for and give opinions
Repair
Conclude/summarise
Cristina
Paolo
This can be followed by feedback and then a second go at the task question
encouraging the students to use the new language.
4.1.2:
The above activity can be easily adapted to show how people deal with interaction in
real-life conversations. I find it motivating to use chat-show interviews of people who
the students know. This can also be used to look at how native-speakers use the
paralinguistic features of turn taking.
4.1.3:
An activity from How to Teach Speaking (2003) can be employed to make candidates
more conscious of the use of turn-taking in real life. This involves comparing
authentic conversation to a typical textbook dialogue. Learners listen to two dialogues
(Appendix 5) and discuss which one is authentic and why.
Robert McCaul
discuss what the differences are and what their use is. Elicit to buy thinking
time. This helps learners to notice the gap between the fluency of the two
dialogues.
Then, I deal with form by getting the students to catergorise hesitation devices
into sounds, expressions, repetition and vague language.
I then get the students to rewrite the edited version in pairs to include
hesitation.
Next, Drill pronunciation chorally and individually. This is a key stage as the
students production must be authentic sounding. Often in exams Spanish
students use hesitation but it sounds very unnatural.
After that, have a controlled practice activity where students perform the
dialogue focusing on the pronunciation of the hesitation devices,
Robert McCaul
Bibliography
Reference Books:
Bygate, M., Speaking, 2008. OUP.
Burgess, S. & Head K., 2005, How to Teach for Exams, Longman.
Brown, G. & Yule, G. 1983. Discourse Analysis, CUP.
Cook, G. 1989. Discourse, OUP.
Halliday, M.A.K. & Hasan, R. 1976. Cohesion in English, Longman.
McWhorter, J., 2005. The Rules of Conversation. The Teaching Company.
Nolasco, R., and Arthure, L., 2001. Conversation OUP.
Parrot, M., 2003. Grammar for English Language Teachers, MacMillan.
Richards, J.C. 2005. The Language Teaching Matrix, CUP.
Slade, D. & Thornbury, S. 2006 Conversation: From Description to Pedagogy, CUP.
Thornbury, S. 2002. About Language Tasks for teacher of English, CUP.
Thornbury, S. 2003. How to Teach Speaking, Pearson Longman.
Thornbury, S. 2005. Beyond the sentence: Introducing discourse analysis, CUP.
UCLES. 2008. First Certificate in English; Handbook for Teachers, CUP.
UCLES. 2011. First Certificate in English, Examination Report.
UCLES. 2008. First Certificate in English; Speaking Test Preparation Pack
Willis, D. 2003. Rules, Patterns and Words. CUP.
Podcasts:
Talk about English , Better Speaking, Episode 1-10, BBC Leaning English.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/webcast/tae_betterspeaking
Articles:
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
76.
Appendix 2
Transcript of an FCE Speaking exam, Norris, R., 2008 Ready for FCE, Macmillan.
PART 4
I: Interlocuter P: Paolo C: Cristina
1. I: Christina, what do you think makes a good museum?
2. C: I don't know really. I suppose that, I think that, in general the museums are
a little bored. You only look at objects
3. which are in, in, erm, how do you say? Erm, well, like
4. boxes, in glass boxes or cupboards, so there is nothing to
5. do. I think if you could touch the things in an exhibition,
6. that would make it more interesting, a more enjoyable
7. experience.
8. I: . Uh huh. Paolo?
9. P: I think ideas like the medieval fair are good because
10. they help you to have a better idea of life in the past. The
11. last year I went to a museum where people in costumes
Robert McCaul Helping FCE students to manage Speaking Exam conversations 14
better by focusing on turn-taking and hesitation
61. replaced for robots which do not need people to use them.
62. C: Do you really think we will have robots?
63. P: Yes, we already have them now. In only a few years, I think we will be able
to use them in the home for doing simple things.
64. C: Well, I think one thing in the museums of the future will
65. be the money. I think the credit cards will be the only thing
66. we use. Already now, some people never pay for things
67. with cash. In only a few years I think they will stop making
68. the money.
69. I: Thank you. That is the end of the test.
Appendix 3
Recording of my colleague (Lucy)answering a typical FCE Question.
Live-Listening (Natural) Version
I: Interlocuter L:Lucy
1. I: What was the most important moment in the history of the 20th century?
2. L: Sorry, I didnt really understand the question. What was the most important
3. aspect of what?
4. I:The most important moment of the 20th Century
5.
L: Thats a difficult questionerrr Let me think mmmwhat was the most
6.
important moment of the 20th Century? Mmmm I haven't thought about it
before,
7.
really but, er, perhaps it wasmmmm.when the first man landed on the
Moon. I
8.
havent Ive seen pictures of this, and I think it should..er what Im trying to
say
9.
is that it must have been something, really quite incredible at the time. Now,
going
10.
into space is sort ofquite normal, but at that moment it was very different,
you know.
Appendix 4
Candidates can also use certain discourse markers to indicate their intentions such as:
Yes no I know (Agreement with a negative idea) This may have to go because
of the word count
(Adapted from Thornbury:2005:9)
Robert McCaul
Appendix 5:
Robert McCaul