Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 2

Cases in Special Civil Actions

Atty. Francheska Senga

RULE 62: INTERPLEADER


1. Rizal Commercial Banking Corp. v. Metro Container Corp., G.R. No. 127913, September 13, 2001;
2. Cebu Woman's Club v. De La Victoria, G.R. No. 120060, March 09, 2000;
3. Lui Enterprises, Inc. v. Zuellig Pharma Corp., G.R. No. 193494, March 12, 2014;
4. Pasricha v. Don Luis Dison Realty, Inc., G.R. No. 136409, March 14, 2008;
5. Del Carmen v. Spouses Sabordo, G.R. No. 181723, August 11, 2014;
6. Lui Enterprises, Inc. v. Zuellig Pharma Corp., G.R. No. 193494, March 12, 2014
RULE 63: DECLARATORY RELIEF AND SIMILAR REMEDIES
1. Tambunting, Jr. v. Spouses Sumabat, G.R. No. 144101, September 16, 2005;
2. Office of the Ombudsman v. Ibay, G.R. No. 137538, September 03, 2001;
3. Ortega v. Quezon City Gov't., G.R. No. 161400, September 02, 2005;
4. Philippine Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 126911, April 30, 2003;
5. Department of Budget and Management v. Manila's Finest Retirees Association, Inc., G.R. No.
169466, May 09, 2007;
6. COA of the Province of Cebu v. Province of Cebu, G.R. No. 141386, November 29, 2001;
7. Social Justice Society v. Lina, G.R. No. 160031, December 18, 2008;
8. Almeda v. Bathala Marketing Industries, Inc., G.R. No. 150806, January 28, 2008;
RULE 64: REVIEW OF JUDGMENTS AND FINAL ORDERS OR RESOLUTIONS OF THE COMELEC AND
COA
1. Balite v. COMELEC, UDK-14858, April 02, 2013;
2. Adraneda v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 205296, February 19, 2013;
3. Palgan v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 200704, March 20, 2012;
4. Alliance for Reform Towards Effective Management and Sustainable Development, Inc. v.
COMELEC, G.R. No. 205736, March 05, 2013;
5. CASIMIRO A. YNARES III, vs. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS AND DANILO O. LEYBLE, G.R. No.
209593, November 19, 2013;
6. Pates v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 184915, June 30, 2009;
7. Lokin, Jr. v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 193808, June 26, 2012;
8. Osmea v. COA, G.R. No. 188818, May 31, 2011;
9. Villagracia v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 168296, January 31, 2007
RULE 65: CERTIORARI, PROHIBITION, MANDAMUS
1. Philippine Rabbit Bus Lines Inc. v. Goimco Sr., G.R. No. 135507, November 29, 2005;
2. Honoridez v. Mahinay, G.R. No. 153762, August 12, 2005;

3. Union Industries, Inc. v. Vales, G.R. No. 140102, February 09, 2006;
4. Manacop v. Equitable PCIBank, G.R. Nos. 162814-17, August 25, 2005;
5. Allgemeine-Bau-Chemie Phils., Inc. v. Metropolitan Bank & Trust Co., G.R. No. 159296, February
10, 2006;
6. Bautista v. Maya-Maya Cottages Inc., G.R. No. 148361, November 29, 2005;
7. Spouses Guerrero v. Domingo, G.R. No. 156142, March 23, 2011;
8. Vivas v. Monetary Board of the BSP, G.R. No. 191424, August 07, 2013;
9. Lihaylihay v. BIR, G.R. No. 202556, September 12, 2012;
10. Uy Kiao Eng v. Lee, G.R. No. 176831, January 15, 2010;
11. Biraogo v. Del Rosario, G.R. No. 206323, April 11, 2013;
12. Manalo v. PAIC Savings Bank, G.R. No. 146531, March 18, 2005
RULE 66: QUO WARRANTO
1. Arquero v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 168053, September 21, 2011;
2. Moro v. Del Castillo, Jr., G.R. No. 184980, March 30, 2011;
3. Vilando v. HRET, G.R. Nos. 192147 & 192149, August 23, 2011;
4. General v. Urro, G.R. No. 191560, March 29, 2011;
5. Arquero v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 168053, September 21, 2011;
6. Munder v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 194076, G.R. No. 194160, October 18, 2011

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi