HOK - State Judicial Complex - Proposal

STATE OF GEORGIA
JUDICIAL COMPLEX
July 23, 2014
GEORGIA STATE FINANCING & INVESTMENT COMMISSION

GEORGIA BUILDING AUTHORITY
Request for Proposal
B R - 5 0 -13 0 2
h o k .co m | Page 2
OUR COMMITMENT
July 23, 2014 Dear Mr. Hyde,

Mr. Jeff Lacks
Georgia State Financing and
Investment Commission
Procurement Services Department
270 Washington Street, SW
Second Floor
Atlanta, Georgia 30334
RE: Letter of Transmittal
RFP No. GBA-182-DP
Request for Proposal
State of Georgia
Judicial Complex
HOK is pleased to submit our proposal for RFQ GBA-182-DP Design Professional services for the State of Georgia
Judicial Complex. On behalf of HOK, I am proud to offer an extraordinary team of experienced planning, design and
engineering professionals for this very important project. This is a unique project in that there are not many State
Judicial Complex projects implemented. This team that has experience with the operations and functions of this type
of state court facility which is essential for achieving a proper facility design for the operations of the highest court in
the state.
The results of our design effort will provide the State of Georgia and particularly the judicial system with a highly
inviting, but also highly secure and environmentally sustainable work environment for the public and staff. Our
specialized knowledge of planning and designing major court facilities makes HOK uniquely qualified.
The HOK Team meets all of the key criteria as well as provides world-class companies and committed professionals
from each we have carefully selected. The firms and professionals were handpicked based on their specific
experience, qualifications necessary to achieve and exceed expectations and requirements of this unique project.
We have successfully worked together in the past and have the complete staffing, technical resources and local
knowledge to execute this project efficiently and effectively.
HOK has the architectural design expertise in house and will hold the sole responsibility for the design and engineering
team coordination. This will be a streamlined team that can effectively manage the design services of the project and
ensure your objectives are successfully achieved. Speaking for the HOK team and as Principal-in-Charge/Senior
Project Manager, we look forward to the opportunity to meet with you, share ideas and discuss your project in more
detail on July 31.
Sincerely,
Michael Katzin, AIA

Vice President | Principal-in-Charge
Page 3 | h o k .co m
TA B L E O F C O N T E N T S
D. Q UA L I F I C AT I O N S A N D E X P E R I E N C E
OF PROPOSED DESIGN TE AM
E. DESIGN PL AN
A P P EN D IX
WE FOCUS ON PROVIDING INNOVATION AND DESIGN EXCELLENCE

IN COURT DESIGN THAT CONFRONTS THE DEMANDS OF OUR TIME,
LOOKS INTO OUR COMMON FUTURE AND PREPARES FOR TOMORROW.
D . Q U A L I F I C AT I O N S
AND EXPERIENCE OF
PROPOSED DESIGN
TEAM
PROJECT LEADERSHIP
Michael Katzin, AIA

Principal - in -Charge
Senior Project Manager
Jeff Goodale, ACA
D1 P R O P O S E D D E S I G N T E A M
QAQC
K EY D ES I G N TEA M M EMBER S
Todd Bertsch,
AIA, LEED AP
Project Designer
Dan Wiley
Court Operations &
Planning Specialist
Robert Schwartz,
NCARB, FAIA,
LEED AP BD+C
Senior Courts Architect
Marc Johnson
AIA, NCARB, LEED AP BD+C
Project Architect
BIM Coordinator
Julia Busby,
ASID, LEED AP
Interior Designer
The HOK team has been specifically assembled for the State
of Georgia Judicial Complex project with the best interest
of GSFIC and the Georgia Building Authority in mind. This
proposed HOK team has recent and relevant experience on
similar projects, which are highlighted in this proposal and
include the Thomas F. Eagleton US District Courthouse, the
Scott M. Matheson Courthouse, and Douglas County Justice
Center. Furthermore, the HOK Design and Consultant Team
has a significant history of successful working experience
with GSFIC . Shown in the adjacent organizational chart are
the key individuals and firms on our proposed team.
K EY ENG I NEER I NG & C O NS U LTA N T TE AM
Jordan & Skala Engineers
Eberly & Associates
Dorma
Gabler Youngston
MEP Engineering
Civil Engineering
Hardware
Lighting
HOK
Faithful and Gould
Waveguide
JA Engineering
Structural Engineering
Cost Estimating
Data, Acoustics, A/V, Court
Security
Technology
D . Q U A L I F I C AT I O N S A N D E X P E R I E N C E O F
PROPOSED DESIGN TE AM
(CONTINUED)
Michael Katzin, AIA, Principal in Charge

Mr. Katzin is responsible for project management
supporting the HOK Justice Business Group in the
Southeast region of the country, which is located in the
Atlanta office. His project experience in government
includes development of courthouses, police precincts,
fire stations, libraries, health centers and correctional
institutions for city, county and Federal agencies.
Robert Schwartz, NCARB, FAIA, LEED AP BD+C,
Project Manager
He is a nationally recognized leader in justice planning and
design and lectures regularly at national conferences. His
work has been published in several textbooks including
Building Type Basics for Justice Facilities and Celebrating
the Courthouse. He was also a major contributor to
the National Center for State Courts publication, The
Courthouse: A Planning and Design Guide for Court
Facilities. He served on a federal panel of architects,
engineers, contractors and developers to establish
methods to reduce the cost of courthouse construction.
Dan Wiley, Court Operations & Planning Specialist

Dan Wiley has been involved with court management and
planning for 35 years. Since 1986, he has led 250 court
facility planning and court operations analysis projects
throughout the United States and internationally. Dan
brings an extensive knowledge base in national court
operations and facility planning trends and is particularly

familiar with the emerging changes in court technology and
its impact on staffing, operations and space.
Jeff Goodale, QAQC
With more than 20 years of experience, Jeff, the national
justice group leader, brings his knowledge of master
planning, programming, and design for Justice projects.
Jeff is recognized for his leadership and commitment to
a team approach, where consensus building and mutual
responsibility are key elements. His other responsibilities
include overall project leadership, client contact,
establishment of architectural concepts, budget
Todd Bertsch, AIA, LEED AP, Design Architect
As a Design Director with over 20 years of experience in
Atlanta, Todd leads one of HOKs strongest studios in the
design of highly complex projects. His high level of design,
attention to detail and vast knowledge of complex buildings
characterizes his unique contribution to the rm.
Marc Johnson, AIA, NCARB, LEED AP BD+C,
Project Architect
With over 14 years of architectural design and project
management experience, Marc Johnson has developed
a project repertoire for mixed-use, retail, education,
healthcare, religious and justice clients. He is well-versed
in every phase of project delivery through a variety of
procurement scenarios.
(CONTINUED)
Julia Busby, Associate ASID, NCIDQ, LEED AP,

Interior Designer
Julia will oversee and support the team by providing interior
design services throughout the project. Julia is particularly
adept at programming, space planning, the development of
color palettes, the selection and specification of materials
and finishes, as well as the development of furnishing
specifications and bid documents.
Tim Milam, PE, Electrical Engineer

Tim has over 25 years of experience managing complex
electrical engineering projects. Tim has an extensive design
background creating power, lighting, fire alarm and related
systems for markets ranging from manufacturing and
industrial complexes to corporate, municipal, hospitality and
multi-family facilities.
Gregory Delaney, PE, LEED AP, Lead Civil Engineer
Matt Breidenthal, SE, PE, LEED AP,

Lead Structural Engineer
Matt is a structural engineer and HOKs East Coast Regional
Leader for Engineering, responsible for delivering awardwinning, complex and demanding multi-disciplinary projects.
Matt brings a deep appreciation for interdisciplinary
collaboration and is recognized for his ability to bring
innovative and creative solutions to the table.
Don Sheffield, PE, LEED AP,
Senior Mechanical Engineer
A firm Principal, registered mechanical engineer, Don is the
Director of Mechanical Engineering for Jordan & Skala.
With over 30 years of experience designing and managing
complex mechanical projects for the industrial, judicial,
corporate, hospitality, healthcare, laboratory, retail and
residential markets.
Mr. Delaney is the Senior Civil Engineering Project

Manager at Eberly & Associates and has corporate
management responsibilities in technical quality assurance
and quality control. Mr. Delaney serves as the Principal in
Charge and Project Manager for the firms municipal and
County government projects.
Mike Pritchett, CCE, CEP, FAACE, Chief Cost Estimator
As technical director and chief estimator for
Faithful+Goulds Atlanta, GA office, Michael Pritchett
is responsible for mobilizing the team and delivering
estimates to ensure quality performance and client
satisfaction. He manages resources and liaises with clients
to ensure that high quality, responsive service and wellresearched information.
D2
MICH A EL K AT ZIN,
AIA
Vice President | Principal- in- Charge and Project Manager

Mr. Katzin is responsible for project management supporting the HOK Justice
Business Group in the Southeast region of the country, which is located in the
Atlanta office. His project experience in government includes development
of courthouses, police precincts, fire stations, libraries, health centers
and correctional institutions for county and Federal agencies. Michael will
participate on this project from beginning to completion.
E D U C AT I O N
University of Tennessee
Bachelor of Science in Architecture,
1980
PROFESSIONAL
R EG I S T R AT I O N S
Architecture: Georgia, OSHA10

MEMBERSHIPS
American Institute of Architects

AIA National Public Architects
Committee, Past Chair
Fulton County Arts Council
Art in Public Places Committee
U.S. National Park Service
Directors Advisory Board for
Development, Past Advisor
American Correctional Association
Academy of Architects for Justice
GASFA
S E L EC T E D R E L E VA N T E X P E R I E N C E
Dawson County Courthouse

Renovation and Expansion
Programming
Dawsonville, Georgia
Gwinnett County Police

Headquarters Annex and E-911
Communications Center
Lawrenceville, Georgia
Douglas County Adult Detention and

Law Enforcement Center
Douglasville, Georgia
Habersham County Justice Facility

Clarkesville, Georgia
Douglas County Court and

Government Administration Building
Douglasville Public Safety and
Municipal Court Building
AWA R D S
Forsyth County Courthouse and Jail

Facility
Cumming, Georgia
Gwinnett County Police

Headquarters Annex and E-911
Communications Center, AIA
Justice Facilities Review, 2010
Coffee County Adult Jail, Court &

Sheriffs Operations Center
Douglas, Georgia
T I M E C O M M I T M E N T 10 0 %
4 LEED Certied
* experience prior to joining HOK
Fulton County Juvenile Court and

Community Library*
Atlanta, Georgia
Fulton County Public Safety Training
Center Relocation*
Fulton County, Georgia
Oconee County Jail

Watkinsville, Georgia
Fulton County Public Safety Training

Center Shooting Range Relocation*
Charleston County Detention Center

Charleston, South Carolina
Fulton County Fire Stations*

Fulton County Jail Complex Master

Planning*
Atlanta, Georgia
Fulton County Medical Examiners

Facility (FCMEF)*
Atlanta, Georgia
Fulton County Jail Courts*

Atlanta, Georgia
Expansion Complex at the U.S.

Penitentiary*
Atlanta, Georgia
Fulton County Jail Building Upgrades*

Atlanta, Georgia.
Martin Army Community Hospital

Fort Benning, Georgia
D2
RO B ERT W. SCH WA RT Z,
FA I A , N C A R B , L E E D A P B D + C
Group Vice President | Senior Courts Architect

For the past 30 years Bob has worked exclusively on the programming, planning and design of
justice facilities. Through careful listening and thorough knowledge of planning, accessibility,
security, sustainability and technology concepts and standards, he has developed judicial
facilities which uniquely fulfill his clients unique ideals. Twenty-two of Roberts past projects
have been recognized by the American Institute of Architects for design excellence in their
annual Justice Facilities Review.
E D U C AT I O N
Washington University
Master of Architecture and
Urban Design, 1978
4 Washtenaw County District Court

Ann Arbor, Michigan
University of Illinois-Chicago
Bachelor of Architecture, 1975
Honors with Highest Distinction
in Design AIA School Medal
PROFESSIONAL
Architecture: Illinois; NCARB;

LEED Accredited Professional
Travis County Civil & Family

Courthouse
Austin, Texas
Marion County Criminal Superior
Courthouse
Indianapolis, Indiana
Robert A. Christensen Justice Center

Phase I and II
Castle Rock, Colorado
4
Alfred A. Arraj US Courthouse

Denver, Colorado
Adams County Justice Center
Brighton, Colorado
Kent County Courthouse
Grand Rapids, Michigan
TIME COMMITMENT 60%
Collin County Courtroom Prototype

McKinney, Texas
Denver Justice Center Master Plan
Denver, Colorado
DuPage County Justice Center
Wheaton, Illinois
Gwinnett County Detention Center
Expansion
Lawrenceville, Georgia
Kane County Trafc Court

St. Charles, Illinois
Lorain County Justice Center

Elyria, Ohio
Buzz Westfall Justice Center

Clayton, Missouri
Johnson County Courthouse Master

Plan
Olathe, Kansas
Union County Courthouse

Jonesboro, Illinois
Buzz Westfall Justice Center

Clayton, Missouri
Old Post Ofce Missouri Court of

Appeals Renovation
St. Louis, Missouri
Thomas F. Eagleton US Federal

Courthouse
St. Louis, Missouri
Potter Stewart U.S. Courthouse and

Federal Building Renovation
Cincinnati, Ohio
MEMBERSHIPS
American Institute of Architects

American Correctional
Association
National Center for State Courts
Kane County Courthouse

Geneva, Illinois
East Multnomah County

Courthouse
Gresham, Oregon
Douglas County Court and
Government Center
4 LEED Certied
McHenry County Government Center

Woodstock, Illinois
Wake County Justice Center

Raleigh, North Carolina
D2
DA N WIL E Y
President | Court Operations and Planning Specialist
Dan Wiley has been involved with court management and planning for 35 years.
Since 1986, he has led court facility planning and court operations analysis projects
throughout the United States. Dan brings an extensive knowledge base in national
court operations and facility planning trends and is particularly familiar with the
emerging changes in court technology and its impact on staffing, operations and
space.
E D U C AT I O N
Florida Atlantic University

Bachelor of Arts in Psychology
Scott M. Matheson Courthouse

Salt Lake City, Utah
St. Louis Family Court

St. Louis, Missouri
MEMBERSHIPS
Douglas County Courthouse

Loudoun County Courthouse

Expansion Program
Leesburg, Virginia
National Center for State Courts

American Bar Association
National Association for Courts
Management
TIME COMMITMENT 60%
US District and Circuit Courthouse

Jacksonville, Florida
Travis County Civil & Family
Courthouse
Austin, Texas
Marion County Criminal Superior
Courthouse
Indianapolis, Indiana
Cuyahoga County Judicial Facilities
Assessment
Cleveland, Ohio
Charlotte County Judicial Master
Space Plan
Punta Gorda, Florida
Wahiawa District Court Technical

Assistance in Programming and
Planning
Wahiawa, Hawaii
Urban Court Master Plan + Regional
Justice Center
Las Vegas, Nevada
Clark County Courts Center
Las Vegas, Nevada
Family Courts Masterplan + Service
Center
Las Vegas, Nevada
Criminal Courthouse Program

Seminole County, Florida
Judicial Master Plan Updated
Charlotte County, Florida
Courthouse Master Plan and Program
City of Jacksonville, Florida
Regional Justice Center Program
Thurston County, Washington
Courthouse Center Renovation
Dade County, Florida
New North Butte County Courthouse
Oroville, California
New Sacramento Criminal
Courthouse
Sacramento, California
Fresno County CourthouseRenovation
Fresno, California
4 LEED Certied
D2
J EF F GOO DA L E
National Director of Justice | QAQC
With more than 20 years of experience, Jeff brings his knowledge of master
planning, programming, and design for Justice projects. Jeff is recognized for his
leadership and commitment to a team approach, where consensus building and
mutual responsibility are key elements. His other responsibilities include overall
project leadership, client contact, establishment of architectural concepts, budget
E D U C AT I O N
University of Illinois, UrbanaChampaign

Bachelor of Science, Architecture
Studies 1986

Jonesboro, Illinois
US Courthouse Remodeling*
Peoria, Illinois
Ottawa County Courthouse*

Grand Haven, Michigan

Walworth County Courtroom

Remodel*
Walworth County, Wisconsin
Polk County Courthouse Annex*

Des Moines, Iowa
P R O F E S S I O N A L R EG I S T R AT I O N S
Jeffrey B. Goodale, The New Breed of
Facility, Correctional News
Today, 7-8/2012
Jeffrey B. Goodale, Dave Menzel, Glen
Hodgson, High-Tech Prisons: Latest
Technologies Drive Cost Savings and Staff
Effi ciencies, Corrections
Today, 7/2005
Jeffrey B. Goodale, Michael Brenchley,
Seven Keys to Cost Cutting Through
Master Planning, American Jails, 1/2005
Jeffrey B. Goodale, New Spaces for
Special Needs Populations, Corrections
Forum, July/ August, 7/2004
T I M E C O M M I T M E N T 10 %
4 LEED Certied
Milwaukee County Courthouse

Facility and Needs Assessment*
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Ellis County Courthouse, Detention
Facility and Parking Garage*
Waxahachie, Texas
Ottawa County Courthouse*
Grand Haven, Michigan
Polk County Courthouse Annex*
Des Moines, Iowa
Washington County Courthouse
Study*
West Bend, Wisconsin
Peoria County Courthouse Addition*
Peoria, Illinois
Lake County Courthouse Renovation

and Modernization*
Waukegan, Illinois
Jonesboro, Illinois
Milwaukee County Courthouse
Facility and Needs Assessment*
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Washington County Courthouse

Study*
West Bend, Wisconsin
Peoria County Courthouse Addition*
Peoria, Illinois
US Courthouse Remodeling*
Peoria, Illinois
Lake County Courthouse Renovation
and Modernization*
Waukegan, Illinois
Ellis County Courthouse, Detention

Facility and Parking Garage*
Waxahachie, Texas
D2
E D U C AT I O N
Georgia Institute of
Technology
Bachelor of Science
in Architecture,
1987
PROFESSIONAL
Architecture:
Georgia, 009878
LEED Accredited
Professional
TO D D B ERTSCH,
Center for
Building Science
& Performance
Advisory Board
Associate | Project Architect
As a Design Director with over 20 years of experience

in Atlanta, Todd leads one of HOKs strongest studios
in the design of highly complex projects. His high level
of design, attention to detail and vast knowledge of
complex buildings characterizes his unique design
contributions to the rm.
With over 14 years of architectural design and

project management experience, Marc Johnson has
developed a project repertoire for mixed-use, retail,
education, healthcare, religious and justice clients.
He is well-versed in every phase of project delivery
through a variety of procurement scenarios.
E D U C AT I O N

Howard University
Bachelor of
Architecture, 1997
4 Porsche Cars North American Headquarters and

Experience Center
Atlanta, Georgia
PROFESSIONAL
Georgia State University

Science Park Phase II
Atlanta, Georgia
Georgia
#RA013043
LEED Accredited
Professional
Building Design +
Construction
4 Georgia Regents University

Medical Education Commons
Augusta, Georgia
MEMBERSHIPS
American Institute
of Architects (AIA)
Georgia State University

Parker Petit Science Center*
Atlanta, Georgia
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Building #23*
Atlanta, Georgia
National
Organization of
Minority Architects
(NOMA)
TIME
COMMITMENT
TIME
COMMITMENT
60%
10 0 %
M A RC J O H NSO N , AIA, NCARB, LEED AP BD+C
Vice President | Design Architect
MEMBERSHIPS
American Institute
of Architects (AIA)
D2
AIA , LEED AP
4 Douglas County Adult Detention & Law
Enforcement Center

Experience Center
Atlanta, Georgia
Center for Civil and Human Rights

Atlanta, Georgia
Equifax
Master Plan and Campus Renovation
Atlanta, Georgia
Grady Hospital Marcus Trauma Center
Atlanta, Georgia
Georgia Tech University Student Center*
Atlanta, Georgia
4 LEED Certied
D2
J U L IA B USBY,
D2
ASID, NCIDQ, LEED AP
M AT T B REID EN T H A L , S E , P E , L E E D A P
Senior Associate | Senior Interior Designer
Senior Associate | Lead Structural Engineer
Julia Busby has 25 years of experience in the interior

design industry. Julia has managed several interiors
project teams throughout her career and is experienced
in providing comprehensive interior design services
from pre-design and programming to full design
development.
Matt is a structural engineer and HOKs East Coast

Regional Leader for Engineering, responsible for
delivering award-winning, complex and demanding multidisciplinary projects. Matt brings a deep appreciation for
interdisciplinary collaboration and is recognized for his
ability to bring innovative and creative solutions to the table.
E D U C AT I O N
E D U C AT I O N
University of
Georgia
Bachelor of Fine
Arts
Douglasville Public Safety and Municipal Court

Building
Stanford University
Master of Science,
Structural
Engineering, 2004
US General Services Administration Federal Building

& Courthouse*
Tuscaloosa, Alabama
4 Douglas County Adult Detention and Law

Enforcement Center
University of
Kansas
Bachelor of Science,
Architectural
Engineering
(Structural
Emphasis), 2001
4 Art Institute of Chicago Modern Wing*

Chicago, Illinois
PROFESSIONAL
Confidential Corporate Headquarters MultiBuilding Development

Eastern United States
PROFESSIONAL
National Council
for Interior Design
Qualification
(NCIDQ) Certified;
Georgia
LEED Accredited
Professional
MEMBERSHIPS
American Society of
Interior Designers
(ASID)
TIME
COMMITMENT
10 0 %
4 LEED Certied

Experience Center
Atlanta, Georgia
Center for Civil and Human Rights
Atlanta, Georgia
AGL Resources Headquarter Renovation
Atlanta, Georgia
Equifax
Master Plan and Campus Renovation
Atlanta, Georgia
Atlanta Financial Center Building and Campus
Renovation
Atlanta, Georgia
Professional
Engineer: State of
Georgia
LEED Accredited
Professional
TIME
COMMITMENT
30%
4 Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts Public

Spaces Redesign*
New York, New York
4 Phillips 66 New Corporate Campus

Houston, Texas
4 US Department of Energy, Fermilab Illinois
Accelerator Research Center*
Batavia, Illinois
Confidential Corporate Campus Expansion &
Renovation
Eastern United States
D2
E D U C AT I O N
Georgia Institute of
Technology
Bachelor of
Mechanical
Engineering, 1984
PROFESSIONAL
Registered
Professional
Engineer in 17
states: AL, AZ,
AK, CO, CT, DE, FL,
GA, IL, IN, KA, KY,
LA, ME, MD, MI, MS,
NE, NC, NH, NJ, NY,
OH, OK, PA, RI, SC,
TN, TX, VA, WV
United States Green
Building Council,
LEED Accredited
Professional
TIME
COMMITMENT
DO N SH EFFIEL D,
D2
PE , LEED AP
TIM MIL A M,
PE
Principal | Senior Mechanical Engineer
Principal | Director of Electrical Engineering
A firm Principal, registered mechanical engineer, Don

is the Director of Mechanical Engineering for Jordan
& Skala. With over 30 years of experience designing
and managing complex mechanical projects for the
industrial, judicial, corporate, hospitality, healthcare,
laboratory, retail and residential markets.
Tim has over 25 years of experience managing complex

electrical engineering projects. Tim has an extensive
design background creating power, lighting, fire
alarm and related systems for markets ranging from
manufacturing and industrial complexes to corporate,
municipal, hospitality and multi-family facilities.
E D U C AT I O N
Habersham County Courthouse

Clarksville, Georgia
Georgia Institute
of Technology
Bachelor of
Electrical
Engineering, 1989
Cobb County Superior Court Building

Marietta, Georgia
Forsyth County Courthouse

Cumming, Georgia
Harris County, First Floor and Courtroom Renovation
Hamilton, Georgia
PROFESSIONAL
University of Florida
Academic and Research Facility at Lake Nona
Orlando, Florida
Registered
Professional
Engineer in AL, AZ,
FL, GA, ID,NJ, NC,
OR, RI
Cobb County Superior Court Building

Marietta, Georgia
Georgia
Greater Atlanta
Electric League
Paulding County Metro Superior Court Facility

Paulding County, Georgia
Elbert County Public Safety Complex
Elberton, Georgia
TIME
COMMITMENT
30%
Columbis Historic Courthouse

Columbus, North Carolina
Rockdale County Courthouse Addition
Rockdale County, Georgia
Fayette County Criminal Justice Center
Fayetteville, Georgia
Troup County Government Center
Troup County, Georgia
Roswell Public Safety Training Building
Roswell Georgia
Whitfield County Law Enforcement Center
Dalton, Georgia
Coffee County Jail
Douglas, Georgia
30%
4 LEED Certied
D2
E D U C AT I O N
Purdue University
Civil Engineering,
1973
PROFESSIONAL
Professional Civil
Engineer in the
states of GA, NC,
SC, AL, AR, TN, IL,
IN, MS, NV, NH, TX,
KS, PA and Puerto
Rico
G R EGO RY D EL A N E Y,
MIK E P RITCH E T T,
C C E , C E P, FA A C E
Principal-in-Charge | Lead Civil Engineer
Technical Director | Chief Estimator
Mr. Delaney is the Senior Civil Engineering Project

Manager at Eberly & Associates and has corporate
management responsibilities in technical quality
assurance and quality control. Mr. Delaney serves as
the Principal in Charge and Project Manager for the
firms municipal and County government projects.
As technical director and chief estimator for Faithful+Goulds

Atlanta, GA office, Michael Pritchett is responsible for
mobilizing the team and delivering estimates to ensure
quality performance and client satisfaction. He manages
resources and liaises with clients to ensure that high quality,
responsive service and well-researched information.
E D U C AT I O N
State Capital Renovations (GBA)

Atlanta, Georgia
Polytechnic Institute
1976
Thomas County Courthouse

Thomasville, Georgia
254 Washington Street (GBA) Waterproofing

Atlanta, Georgia
C E R T I F I C AT I O N S
Richmond County Judicial Center

Charlotte, North Carolina
Mitchell Street Pedestrian Plan (GBA)

Atlanta, Georgia
Cobb County Superior Courthouse
Marietta, Georgia
Rockdale County Government Center
Rockdale County, Georgia
LEED Accredited
Professional
South Fulton Community Justice Center

TIME
COMMITMENT
Newton County Courthouse

Covington, Georgia
30%
D2
PE , LEED AP
Cherokee County Courthouse

Cherokee County, Georgia
Association for the

Advancement of
Cost Engineering
(AACE), Certified
Cost Engineer
(CCE), 2000
Association for the
Advancement of
Cost Engineering
(AACE), Certified
Estimating
Professional (CEP),
2008
(AACE), President
Elect, Atlanta
Chapter, 2012
TIME
COMMITMENT
Tuscaloosa Federal Building

Tuscaloosa, Alabama
New Bern Federal Courthouse
New Bern, North Carolina
U.S. Federal Courthouse
Columbia, South Carolina
Henry County Courthouse
McDonough, Georgia
U.S. Federal Courthouse
Knoxville, Tennessee
U.S. Court of Appeals, Judge Chambers Renovation
Nashville, Tennessee
30%
4 LEED Certied
Page 17
Page|17
h o k| .co
h om
k .co m
(CONTINUED)
D3 I N D I V I D U A L P O I N T O F C O N TA C T A N D T O O L S
Successful completion of justice facilities is only achieved

through strong project management. Our project manager
and principal-in-charge, Michael Katzin has earned an
excellent reputation for delivering complex justice facilities
on time and on budget. He reacts quickly to any problems
that may arise during design and construction phases
and takes prompt corrective action when necessary. His
oversight of the production of organized, coordinated and
complete construction documents minimizes the possibility
of misunderstanding, delay and increased project cost.
As a Vice President with the firm, he has the full authority
to sign contracts and garner the resources of the firm to
the benefit of the project.
With more than 23 years of experience on a variety of
Justice types throughout the country, Michael has worked
on significant projects that involve a variety of delivery
scenarios. Michaels approach to achieving project success
is directly tied to effective communication among all team
members. Communication involves face to face meetings,
electronic methods including our Advanced Collaboration
Room technology and hard copies of project data. He
ensures that all team members and stakeholders participate
and their voice is heard. Effective communications and
continuous monitoring of actual versus plan is critical to
keeping projects on time and on budget.
One of Michaels key attributes is that he is a practicing

architect. Michaels background gives him a deep
understanding of how a building actually goes together.
He actively reviews all drawings within our construction
document sets and often draws key details or modifies
existing details to improve quality, constructability and
cost. Michael is truly a hands-on project manager.
Michael will benefit from established and proven
management tools that are provided to him through
HOK. Recognizing that carefully executed construction
documents facilitate accurate bidding and construction
and protect the financial interests of the client, HOK
emphasizes team communication and an interactive design
process. With this in mind, and as a method of maintaining
consistency and quality in the construction documents
and ultimate built design, HOK has developed the following
Quality Control and Management tools and techniques:
Project Procedures Manual - Although HOK has
firm-wide project procedures, we typically create a
customized procedures manual for every project. This
serves as a tool to achieve consistency, completeness
and coordination throughout the project team. This
manual includes the organizational structure of the
team and establishes uniform and consistent design
standards, specification formats, correspondence format
and flow and procedures for coordination.
(CONTINUED)
Project Status Meetings Meetings are held weekly

or biweekly to review the progress of work, to ensure
that documents in progress accurately reflect design
decisions, to discuss and resolve issues and to
coordinate details. We believe that it is important to
include every team member to improve the lines of
communication and to instill a sense of collaboration.
Technology Integration In addition to being
technologically advanced in our project management
capability, HOK is also on the forefront of using technology
as a design tool. Utilizing BIM - Revit, and other software
tools, such as 3D Studio, we can provide our clients with
fast and realistic depictions of our designs. This creates
yet another opportunity to confirm the clients intent and
the direction of the design as it develops.
Design Reviews Our design process typically begins
with an intense charrette to establish design goals and
direction for the project. Periodically throughout the
project we also have internal design reviews to evaluate
the design for compliance with the program, resolve
design issues, communicate the design intent to the
entire team and evaluate technical aspects of the design.
We have found that the best solutions include a balance
of design and technical issues and that the Design
Review process provides a good forum to unite and
discuss these concerns. Third party quality reviews are
conducted at specified milestones.
Workplans We create workplans for every phase of the

project to determine the appropriate staffing required
and to ensure that our services are provided on schedule.
Consultant services are integrated into this plan to
ensure timely document and specification coordination.
We see this as a tool during our Project Status Meetings
to communicate the necessary requirements to the
entire team. This also brings a sense of collaboration to
the team as each member sees how his task fits into the
entire teams responsibility.
Construction Documents Production Use of HOK-wide
standards for Revit drawings; utilization of HOK Best
Practices library and specifications allows each project
to gain from the knowledge of the entire firm. These
are available to each team staff professional on their
desktop. We conduct standard construction document
reviews by peers at key project Schematic Design, Design
Development, and Construction Document milestones.
Manpower Allocation Within HOK - An extensive number
of design professionals are available to the project team
as needed to accommodate project requirements. The
strength and depth of resources of 35 staff from HOK
Atlanta and over 1,700 HOK employees worldwide brings
the Georgia Judicial Complex project assurance and
availability of resources to meet the tight deadlines.
D4
T H O M A S F. E A G L E T O N U S
DISTRICT COURTHOUSE
G E N E R A L S E R V I C E S A D M I N I S T R AT I O N
St. Louis, Missouri
As a major landmark for the city of St. Louis, the Thomas F. Eagleton United States Courthouse is
the home of the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals and the District Court of Eastern Missouri. As the
largest single courthouse in the world, it rises 560 feet with 29 oors above grade and four oors of
parking and support space below.
The tower, which houses trial courts, uses a unique split-level stacking concept that maximizes
adjacencies, provides natural light to all public areas including courtrooms and increases the
volumetric building efciency while decreasing its overall height. It allows the courtrooms to be
expressed on the exterior, differentiating the courthouse from corporate and speculative ofce
buildings in the downtown area.
The courthouse is designed to expand internally from 25 courtrooms to as many as 38 by displacing
other government agencies while retaining stringent security and circulation requirements. The
courthouse sits in the middle of the block, maximizing stand-off distance from surrounding streets
to decrease the impact of car bombs and providing site area for future expansion.
In my career with the courts, I had the good fortune to work with many architects around
the countrythe [Thomas F.] Eagleton Courthouse design process as led by the HOK team,
is still the gold standard for how design should be developed and a project managed.
- Richard L. Gilyard, FAIA, Assistant Circuit Executive (Ret.),
Eighth Circuit Court of Appealsy
P R O J EC T S U C C E S S E S & C H A L L E N G E S
The amount of excavation required for four oors of below

grade construction reduced by slurry wall construction
posed a challenge to this project. However, a meter wide
trench was excavated and lled with a bentonite slurry to
keep the sides from collapsing. Then steel reinforcing was
lowered into the slot and concrete poured in displacing the
bentonite. This created a bath tub that allowed the inside
to be safely excavated reducing temporary bracing and
tiebacks and total construction time.
Many of the interior public areas had stone walls which are
costly to purchase and add weight the structural system
has to support. Using a thin layer of stone on a honeycomb
backing decreased cost and weight while delivering a
smooth, at surface that will last the life of the building.
The Visualization of the design for users not commonly
involved in construction proved a challenge for this project
. We used a combination of models, computer generated
views and video animations to explain the design. We also
built courtroom mock-ups that permitted al the users to
test the sightlines, adjacencies and proportions prior to
construction. We also had nished mock-ups of important
details during construction to conrm the integration of
nishes and features were as expected.
The courthouse building program was under scrutiny from
every angle. The user/owner/design team were proactive
in developing creative cost saving strategies to keep the
project moving forward. This included reducing the area of
the building, changing nishes and developing synergies
with increased multi-use space and volumetric efciency.
SIZE
SCHEDULE SUMMARY
P R O J EC T T E A M
1,037,632 sq. ft.

24,000 sq. ft. renovation of existing
The project was bid in two parts.

Phase 1 was for site remediation,
construction of a foundation slurry wall
to bedrock, excavation and all below
grade construction as well as the 500
foot tall building core. Phase 2 was
for the remainder of the courthouse.
The overall schedule was impacted by
increased remediation requirements, a
GSA time out and review that stopped
all their design and construction
projects, ongoing changes in project
scope and the ring of the general
contractor.
Gerald Gilmore, Principal Architect

no longer with HOK
T O TA L VA L U E O F P R O J EC T
$184 Million
DAT E S
1992-2000
C H A N G E O R D E R I N F O R M AT I O N
The contractor violated their

contract with GSA by using
Chinese construction materials and
questionable billing practices. They
were red but because of that any
change order log was stopped and all
project nancials conscated. When
the dust settled GSA acted as the
contractor and rehired most of the
existing sub-contractors and a few new
ones. We assisted GSA in developing
remedies to the deciencies found
and getting the project completed but
do not have a complete project record
of the change orders and project
nancials.
C L I E N T C O N TA C T A N D
REFERENCE
Gyo Obata, Principal Design Architect

retired, no longer with HOK
Robert Schwartz, Court Planner,
Designer
still with HOK
Joe Robertson, Project Manager
no longer with HOK
Lee LeBoeuf, Project Architect
still with HOK
David Dimitry, Project Architect
still with HOK
Terry Laen, Project Architect
still with HOK
Linda Phillips
General Services Administration
Design & Construction Division
816-926-8305
Page 21
Page|21
h o k| .co
h om
k .co m
SIZE
685,000 sq. ft.
Alan Bright, Project Designer

still with HOK
$68.2 Million
Lynn Filar, Project Architect

still with HOK
DAT E S
1994-1998
Clifford Ham, Project Manager

No longer with HOK
Fortunato Zanghi, Project Architect

No longer with HOK
There were no change orders recorded due to

the fact it was a design build project.
SCHEDULE SUMMARY
This project was completed according to the

clients schedule expectations.
C L I E N T C O N TA C T A N D R E F E R E N C E
State of Utah
Division of Facilities Construction
801.538.3263
h o k .co
Page
22m | | h o
Page
k .co22
m
D4
S C O T T M . M AT H E S O N
COURTHOUSE
A D M I N I S T R AT I V E O F F I C E O F T H E C O U R T S
Salt Lake City, Utah
The most signicant challenge of this prestigious national design competition was the creation of
an architectural expression that appropriately reects the dignity and gravity of the court system.
Additionally, this project needed to reect the traditions of Salt Lake architecture. Located on one
of the citys most prominent sites, it was required to be properly integrated into the Citys innovative
urban design master plan.
The primary operational challenge was development of the proper functional relationships in the
large oorplate made necessary by site and urban design conditions. Also, the co-location of State
Supreme and Appellate, district and magistrate, family and juvenile, arraignment and high security
courts presented further challenges. From an economic viewpoint, the most imposing challenge was
meeting the states budget of less than $72 million (including soft costs), or no more than $117 per
gross square foot (far below comparable projects nationwide).
The primary operational challenge was development of

the proper functional relationships in the large oorplate
made necessary by site and urban design conditions.
Also, the co-location of State Supreme and Appellate,
district and magistrate, family and juvenile, arraignment
and high security courts presented further challenges.
From an economic viewpoint, the most imposing challenge
was meeting the states budget of less than $72 million
(including soft costs), or no more than $117/GSF (far below
comparable projects nationwide). HOKs solution for this
unique six-week competition was unanimously selected by
a wide margin over other schemes.
HOKs solution for this unique six-week competition was unanimously selected by a wide margin
over other schemes. The 420,000 SF complex includes 38 courts and associated administrative
and support spaces for the Clerks of the Court, law libraries, public and private dining, conference
center, and the Sheriffs Department. The T-shaped pedestrian spine on the ground level, with
the Rotunda as its hub, creates easy circulation for the ofces and courts with the same concept
followed throughout the building. The oorplates are designed for 16 courts and exceeded the
efciency of the States program. In addition, HOKs design incorporates future expansion for
additional courtrooms.
There has been a listening, hearing, and professionally responsive attitude displayed by
all members of the team. In no case was a concern or issue down played or dismissed.
Thoughtful, professional, and well researched answers are the norm ... Our compliments to
The most signicant challenge of this prestigious national

design competition was the creation of an architectural
expression that appropriately reects the dignity and
gravity of the court system.
HOK furthered the citys goals by complementing the scale

of nearby buildings and creating a mid-block passage
through the site. HOK San Francisco led the competition
team in the creation of a winning design that the builder
priced at $68 million, including soft costs - parking garage,
furnishings, equipment and site preparation costs. This is
$4 million below budget and represents a square foot cost
of only $115.
the design build team in this significant effort.

- Division of Facilities Construction & Management, State of Utahg
Page 23
Page|23
h o k| .co
h om
k .co m
SIZE
SCHEDULE SUMMARY
340,000 sq. ft.
The project schedule was achieved. This was a

Fast Track project with a requirement to establish
GMP in nine months. Separate early packages
for sitework and foundations was issued for
permit and construction. A nal package for shell,
core, and structure was subsequently issued. A
Weapons Training Firing Range was added to the
scope and was treated as a separate project. The
project was completed within the Owners schedule
requirements.
Michael Katzin, PIC, Project Manager

still with HOK
$102 Million
DAT E S
2008-2009
For this $100 million, 500,000 sf, multi-building

project there were two Change Orders presented
to the Client for the project. The overall budget
remained within the GMP amount. Change Order
No. 1 was $340,040. Change Order No. 2 was
for ($330,178) for return of Owner and remaining
construction contingencies. The team was pleased
that designing to GMP in 9 months and only having
two change orders in construction was a success.
Bob Schwartz, Planner

still with HOK
Jeff Goodale, Principal Laboratory Planner
still with HOK
Marc Johnson, Project Architect
still with HOK
Julia Busby, Interior Designer
still with HOK
C L I E N T C O N TA C T A N D R E F E R E N C E
Eric Linton
County Administrator
Douglas County Government
770.920.7209
elinton@co.douglas.ga.us
D4
DOUGL AS COUNT Y
COURT AND GOVERNMENT SERVICES COMPLEX
PROGRAMMING AND MASTER PLANNING
The HOK programming and planning effort for Douglas County provides options and
recommendations to establish a courthouse utilization plan for short-term and long-term
needs of the 220,000 sq. ft. Douglas County Courthouse, which houses the countys
judicial and government services functions.
The programming and redeployment plan is based on a 20-year planning horizon and
recognizes short-term and long-term needs in order to maximize efciency and minimize
court and customer service disruptions associated with phased implementation. The overall
plan provides for a long-term program where the entire facility can be utilized for court
services with up to 14 courtrooms with government services functions relocated into a new
120,000 sq. ft. Government Administration Complex on adjacent county property. The
programming and planning included review of projected population and court case growth,
space and staff needs, and existing building utilization and limitations.
I have had the pleasure of working with HOK on multiple Douglas County projects.
HOK has been providing justice related planning and design services for the
Douglas County government for over sixteen years. HOK and its Justice Group
staff have exemplified the highest level of dedication, professionalism and quality
management of our complex design and engineering capital projects.
G. Eric Linton, County Administrator, Douglas Countyn
Budget: The project needed to be below $200.00/sq. ft.

During each phase of the project, value analysis decisions
were examined based upon creating the most efcient and
cost-effective facility possible, without sacricing security
operations and staff requirements. During program
verication, this required reducing 10% of the program.
Most of this was achieved in circulation efciency
solutions.
Design: The projects high prole location needed to t
within the parameters of the Countys master plan and
required the design of the facility to be carefully conceived
with a normative, community-centric appearance. This
was achieved by carefully articulating blend of brick,
glazing and varying levels of metal panels more reminiscent
of an ofce building than a law enforcement center or jail.
Another challenge with site design was taking into
consideration the future expansion and relocation of the
county administration functions, while implementing the
rst phase as a facility that can standalone on the site
with a pleasant visual approach and be the beginning of a
government campus after the administrative buildings are
built.
187
Number of HOK LEED

Certified Projects
12
3
1
Platinum
Gold
Silver
Certified
SUSTAINABLE EXPE
EXPERIENCE
ERIENCE
(CONTINUED)
17
90
53
27
BREEAM Certified
Green Mark Certified
ed
Green Globe
Eight AIA Committee on the

Environment Top Ten Green
Projects
#1 in DesignIntelligence 2011
1
survey of Most Inuential Green
en
Design Firms
U.S. Green Building Council

Organizational Excellence Award
rd
AIA COTE, CoreNet Global and IIDA

DA
Sustainable Design
Leadership Award
Global Green USA
Designing a Sustainable and
Secure World Award
Sustainable Buildings
Industry Council Best Sustainable
ble
Practice Award
AIA Presidential Citation for
Sustainable Design
D4 E N E R GY E F F I C I E N T D E S I G N S A N D P R I N C I P L E S
HOK is a leader in the design of buildings which are energy

and water efficient and provide healthy environments for
its users. Named the top sustainable architectural design
firm in the United States the first two years of the award
by Engineering News Record (ENR) it is part of our culture
and every integrated into every design. We have completed
187 LEED projects including design LEED Silver Wake
County Courthouse and the LEED Silver Richard E.
Arnason Justice Center.
Provide a pleasant working environment

Garner positive public relations
Contribute to environmental stewardship
Our objective is to design buildings that are fiscally
sensitive, environmentally responsible and healthy places
to live and work. HOK will work with the Georgia Judicial
Complex to identify and implement green strategies
appropriate to this renovation project.
D4 E X P E R I E N C E I N B U I L D I N G I N F O R M AT I O N M O D E L I N G
HOKs Justice Group has helped pioneer the integration

of sustainable design principles into a number justice and
government facilities. Our team was responsible for the
design of the GSAs Prototype of Sustainable Courthouse
Design with the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse
in Denver. Each energy efficiency strategy was carefully
weighed for both short- and long-term payback taking
advantage of low cost planning and design attributes
that maximize solar orientation, daylight harvesting and
vegetation and other features required by the clients
program such as blast protection and wire management
systems. Total energy savings were projected at 50
percent over traditional courthouses.
Our team will work with GSFIC and the Georgia Building
Authority to identify sustainable initiatives such as:
Save money on energy, water, and materials
Reduce maintenance and operating costs
Increase productivity
(BIM)
All government projects undertaken by HOKs Justice

group are planned and programmed using our advanced
BIM techniques. We employ BIM as an integral part of
planning and programming for facilities because it adds
a unique dimension to the insideout approach to the
design of these facilities. It allows us to model the design
and engineering requirements of each space, in a live
database that tracks all changes and utility and equipment
needs. Once the preliminary needs assessment for the
Georgia Judicial Complex has been drafted, HOK will move
immediately into this form of documentation for both the
blocking of the building layout as well as the evaluation of
design options and technical requirements for each space.
The 3D representation typically included in our smart
room data sheets, facilitates both design communications
with scientists and facility managers, and evaluates the
movement and flow of equipment and materials.
E1 HOK is an integrated
multidisciplinary design rm that
takes total responsibility and
accountability for project concerns.
The HOK team will provide full
professional design services including
architecture, interior design, MEP
engineering, structural engineering,
code consulting and cost estimating
services. The HOK Atlanta ofce has
been a well-established architectural
practice in the State of Georgia
since 1994 and has signicant
project experience with the Georgia
State Financing and Investment
Commission (GSFIC).
S TAT E O F R H O D E
ISL AND SUPREME
COURT
LEIGHTON JUDICIAL COMPLEX
Warwick, Rhode Island
CASE STUDY
E. DESIGN PL AN
Four times larger than its predecessor, this

s
courthouse embraces the challenges of
providing security, accessibility and flexibility,
ity,
while best serving the public and the judicial
al
staff. The complex includes space for 16 court
ourt
rooms and offices for the District, Family and
nd
Superior Courts with each division occupying
ing
its own floor. At the ground level are offices
for the Attorney General, Public Defender,
probation offices and the Capitol Police. The
he
complex is also separated by a 100-foot-wide
ide
restored wetland garden to a new five-levell
parking garage. Separate covered walkways
for the public and staff create a formal
courtyard to the Judicial Center.
E. DESIGN PL AN
(CONTINUED)
P H I L O S O P H Y O F C O L L A B O R AT I O N & A P P R OA C H T O
CONFLICT RESOLUTION
HOK understands what it takes to manage and engage

diverse stakeholders in productive discussions about
complex, sometimes controversial, issues. We appreciate
the challenges involved in bringing the client, the design
team and the stakeholders together in a process of
discovery, problem solving and action planning.
Due to the scope and nature of HOKs projects, we have

followed these key principles to minimize and resolve
conflict, and will utilize them on your project:
Following the principles below, we have been able to bring

diverse, often opposing voices, into planning processes in
productive, meaningful ways.
1. Develop a Roles and Responsibilities Matrix at the onset

of the project including the broader team. This tool
facilitates communication as well as ensures that the
right parties are involved and committed.
2. Develop a Communication Tree. This tool ensures that

all parties are informed when necessary and maintained
current. It also identifies the flow of information and
eliminates the need for guesswork.
Establish a Clear, Transparent Process

Build Understanding & Ownership
Reach beyond the Usual Players
Follow a No Surprises Ethic
We advocate a collaborative charrette based approach that

brings the client, the design team and the stakeholders
together in a more integrated, transparent process of
mutual discovery, problem solving and action planning.
We strive to maintain constant communication; in this
manner we are able to identify potential areas of conflict
before they escalate. The key to effective conflict
resolution for this project team will be based on personal
relationships and understanding that if the project is

to succeed within the time and budget constraints, the
complete cooperation of all those involved is imperative.
3. Integrate the critical decision process into the

project work plan, via meeting agendas and decision
timeframes, ensuring stakeholders understand what the
focus is, they are ready and have sufficient engagement
to make informed decisions.
4. Set up open and continuous communication within
the project team: owner, architects, engineers and
contractor.
E. DESIGN PL AN
(CONTINUED)
5. Establish formal/structured partnering sessions

throughout the course of the project.
6. Foresee issues before they arise and work with a team
to prevent them. When challenges do arise, define the
issue as soon as possible. Solve the challenge at the
lowest possible level within the project team.
7. When conflicts do arise that cannot be resolved without
third party involvement, agree to non-binding mediation.
Frequent design, scheduling, and coordination meetings
can act as the primary method of conflict resolution. We
anticipate biweekly meetings with GSFIC, the Georgia
Building Authority and the design team to review project
schedule and design.
By using all of the team members expertise to identify
potential problems, issues can be addressed before they
impact cost or schedule. Open channels of communication
play a decisive role in completing a project successfully.
P R O P O S E D M E T H O D S O F C O M M U N I C AT I O N
Communication and collaboration are essential ingredients

for expediting the decision making process.
The most effective and efficient method of communication
is always face-to-face. Our entire design team is ideally
located in Atlanta to maximize direct communication with
the Georgia Judicial Complex and we intend to leverage
this to the full extent.
Our HOK team will be available to attend team meetings,
on short notice throughout the design process. We will
coordinate, lead and document all key stakeholder oncampus workshops. We will have formal sign-offs of the
decisions made to ensure that we have consensus and
we are all moving forward in the same direction. Between
meetings, we will coordinate and communicate extensively
with Project Managers and other appropriate points of
contact. In addition, we have many electronic tools to
facilitate project delivery including: e-mail, ftp sites and a
project specific website. Properly integrated, these tools
contribute to more and efficient and effective delivery of
services.
E. DESIGN PL AN
(CONTINUED)
All HOK projects are subject to a quality assurance

philosophy and receive thorough reviews according to an
HOK Quality Assurance Plan developed for each project
using published HOK QA/QC guidelines. Two key aspects
of this plans successful application include:
1. Awareness at all levels that quality starts with designers
and production staff but is also the responsibility of the
entire team, and
2. Face-to-face coordination between disciplines is
necessary to reduce miscommunication and improve the
overall quality of document integration.
HOK has for many years been using electronic based
project management systems. We routinely employ
electronic check lists, and web based design and
construction administration tools to facilitate accurate and
quick communication between various team members.
HOK has developed its own construction administration
document and an issue tracking system that it employs
in all its projects. The system gives the contractor,
subcontractor, owner, user and design team access to the
status of punchlists, shop drawing logs, change order logs
as well as responses to contractor Request for Information
(RFIs). Our field reports are issued electronically to the
team members within 24 hours of site visits. HOK also

has the capability to work with owner or contractors web
based project management tools.
HOK has successful and extensive experience managing
projects of various scales and complexities. We understand
the importance of proactive and collaborative project
management, and we know how to manage best the entire
teams effort with regard to budget and schedule. We have
an excellent track record for delivering projects on time and
within specified cost limitations.
SCHEDULE
HOK assumes a leadership role for the pace of critical

decision-making and for the overall progress of the
projects development. We use computer-based project
management and project scheduling software to establish
the primary critical path as well as the incremental
milestones and task deadlines necessary to keep things
on course. In weekly Project Management meetings,
HOK closely monitors milestone/ task deadlines as key
indicators of the teams ability to meet schedule targets
and takes immediate remedial action, if necessary
decisions, actions or deliverables are not provided by the
responsible team member as required
E. DESIGN PL AN
(CONTINUED)
COST CONTROL
HOKs cost modeling methodology is derived from more

than forty years of project management experience, yet
it maintains a very direct, uncomplicated structure. After
establishing the desired hard cost target, the first step
in the cost control process is to work in conjunction with
the Owner and the Project Managers to break the total
target construction cost into a number of components or
systems and to establish an sub-budget objective for each
of these elements, the total of which will equal the intended
construction cost. Establishing the elemental cost model
allows for discussions about each component related
to the performance expectations, desired appearance,
intended quality, and a host of other criteria that will guide
the amount of money to be allocated to each component
within the overall budget. HOKs cost control methodology
requires periodic testing of the construction cost at a
number of critical milestone points by re-checking each
cost category. Informal measurement, in the form of
spot checks related to pricing of component pieces or
systems, takes place as desired throughout the design and
documentation process. If the variance from the budget
is relatively small, the wayward component can be easily
brought back into line.
E. DESIGN PL AN
(CONTINUED)
E2 UNIQUE CHALLENGES / RISK
Re-Confirm Construction Budget

Trend
Many contractors are reporting the forthcoming
Braves Ballpark, Falcons Stadium and State Farm
headquarters projects will absorb regional labor and
materials and will impact prices for other projects that
will go to bid or be in procurement in the next few years.
Recommendation
Expand cost estimating services by including and
implementing a formal, internal Value Analysis in the
Schematic and Design Development Phases
Our team has the expertise, tools and experience
to conduct formal Value Analysis and focus cost
management on major building systems
Accuracy in Pre-Construction Pricing by Construction
Managers
Trend
Many owners experiencing non-transparent and
non-competitive pre-construction pricing and
constructability reviews during the schematic and
design development phases.
This results in schedule impact in achieving a bid or
Guaranteed Maximum Price milestone in a timely
manner. This also results in a tension between Owner,

Architect and Contractor.
Recommendation
Option 1 require the contractor to produce actual
sub quotes
Option 2 - Engage two Construction Managers to do
and compete on the Pre-Construction pricing effort
Contractor - Construction Schedule & Project Delivery
Method Confirmation
Trend
Many owners experiencing bid submittals and a
confirmation to meet schedule
When a contract is signed then the schedule is
qualified that separate packages are required
This can result is additional cost for the A/E to modify
the project delivery that results in issuance of multiple
document packages for compiling, coordination,
review, approval and procurement
Recommendation
Make sure the Construction Invitation to Bid (ITB)
document includes a statement that the ITB schedule
shall be met without requiring separate bid packages
for site, foundation and structure.
E. DESIGN PL AN
(CONTINUED)
Early Courtroom Mock-up

Trend
Some clients are not able to fund construction of a
courtroom mock-up during the design phases.
This can result is changes during the construction
phase
Recommendation
We recommend construction of a courtroom mockup in the design phases and make appropriate
adjustments to solicit approval of the judicial
stakeholders and courtroom bench height, sightlines,
lighting and also the millwork and finishes budget.
This can avoid significant change orders if done after
Construction Documents are completed.
The resulting design directives will be communicated

to all Team members and incorporated into the design.
Stormwater Management:
Storm water management will be required for the
project it is not desirable to have a surface detention
pond.
The neighboring park retention water feature will be
explored for capacity
City of Atlanta Ordinances will prevail and provide a
guideline approach that may be used to develop the
plan.
This may provide an opportunity for landscape
irrigation water.
Site Engineering & GDOT:

I-75 influences and Memorial Drive Department of
Transportation control will necessitate thorough and
extensive interaction with GDOT.
The street designs will comply with GDOT
requirements and restrictions.
Meetings will be held early with GDOT to define the
design parameters.
E. DESIGN PL AN
(CONTINUED)
E. DESIGN PL AN
(CONTINUED)
E3 PROPOSED TIMELINE
HOK embraces project scheduling and workplan

development as the foundation for a successful project.
We will work with to create a responsive and effective
workplan that responds to the overall desired schedule. A
detailed workplan/schedule established at the beginning
of the project will identify key deliverables, decisions, and
milestone progress points for team members. Our HOK
project team will work with GSFIC, the Georgia Building
Authority, contractors and consultants to establish this
workplan.
From the beginning of the project, milestone dates will be
established by all participants. This will enable the project
schedule to be met and allow work to be conducted in an
orderly manner.
Operational schedules will then be maintained, including:
Weekly calendar schedules
Progress report schedule
Phase percent complete report
We anticipate a number of regular meetings with GSFIC,
and the Georgia Building Authority to ensure the entire
team knows the status of work and to confirm that we
are meeting the project goals. These meetings help
communicate project status, issues for decision, and
action item responsibilities.
We provide monthly progress reports that describe the

months activities, project issues, anticipated events,
schedule adherence, costs, meeting notes, and other
written and design documentation. Scheduling during
design will identify all required activities (in-house,
consultants, corporate management, and government
agencies) and sequence them on a time-line to ensure
that they get completed. As the design develops and we
begin construction documents, we will research all unique
material and equipment requirements and establish the
need dates for advance procurement when appropriate.
HOK satisfies project schedules by rigorous work planning,
staffing projects appropriately, and managing a teams
task priorities with respect to critical path activities. We
maintain several types of project schedules for the benefit
of our clients and HOKs team; one is a short-term look
ahead schedule, which guides the day-to-day productivity
of the team and identifies design milestones which must
be achieved to maintain overall progress. Our project
work planning complements HOKs office-wide workload
management system, which tracks individual staff
assignments and actual time charges with a four-month
planning horizon. This allows the firm to identify resource
requirements and potential conflicts early enough so that
we can meet the most difficult schedule demands. HOK is
knowledgeable and has a proven track record of meeting
and exceeding our clients expectations regarding cost and
schedule control.
E. DESIGN PL AN
(CONTINUED)
The proposed schedule and workplan is based on a CM/

GC project delivery method, and illustrates the delivery of
project construction documents for the Judicial Complex
within 18 months. We believe it is in the GBA and GSFICs
best interest to begin construction in mid-2016. The
reason for this is related to competitiveness cost while
other major projects are under construction. There will
be three major local projects expecting to complete in or
by late 2017. They include the new Braves Ball Field,
Falcons Stadium and State Farm Insurance projects.
The competitiveness timing will be especially critical
for structural systems labor and materials. An earlier
construction start could reduce structural costs. A detailed
Microsoft Projects Schedule is located in the Appendix
of our proposal in addition to the graphic schedule on the
previous pages.
Our schedule includes
The schedule is shown with no stops between the design
phases and the construction phase. We do however
understand that the commencement of the construction
phase is contingent upon state approval of funds.
Workshops/Meetings are planned on a 3 week interval
over the course of the project to ensure project
milestones and objectives are met.
Weekly management status/look ahead conferences.

Early, cursory State Fire Marshal review to obtain buy-in
on the project life safety concepts. This will eliminate any
major surprises during Construction Documents.
Early, cursory City of Atlanta review to obtain buy-in
on the project site development. This will eliminate any
major surprises during Construction Documents.
A/E Cost Estimates will be reviewed with GSFIC, GBA
and other judicial stakeholders at each project milestone.
We assumed a GSFIC Design Review Group (DRG) review
period at the end of each phase. A final presentation
to GSFIC, GBA, and other judicial stakeholders to get
approval and notice to proceed at each project milestone.
Detailed project schedule in addition to the schedule
shown on the following pages is attached in appendix of
this submittal.
Schedule Compliance Systems & Procedures
HOK uses Newforma and Deltek for time management and
scheduling.
Weekly internal team meetings.
Schedule updates in the agenda of Owner/Architect
meetings during the design phases.
E. DESIGN PL AN
(CONTINUED)
Alternate Schedule
Having analyzed the projects complexity, the importance
of collaboration and regular feedback, and proper owner
review at each milestone, we believe the best method of
compressing the schedule, if desired, is to:
Maintain the same structure but shorten the cycle of
workshops, presentations and reviews.
Modify the project delivery to include Fast Track,
separate pricing and permitting packages that could
include
+ site development,
+ foundations/structure and
+ shell/core/interior/building systems packages.
E4 C O N S T R U C T I O N A D M I N I S T R AT I O N
During the construction phase, the design team will attend

bi-weekly job meetings, make periodic site visits, write
and submit progress reports and observe the progress
of the work to determine if the work is proceeding in
accordance with the contract documents. The design
team shall observe the construction of the facilities to
determine whether individual work elements are in general
conformance with the design intent shown on the design
documents. GSFIC and the Georgia Judicial Complex will
be regularly informed of the progress of the work and,
when necessary, notified in writing of deficiencies.
The design team shall review shop drawings, catalog cuts,

laboratory and mill tests and samples for conformance
with the Construction Documents. When necessary, the
design team shall interpret and provide recommendations
on the requirements of the Construction Documents and
instruct contractors on behalf of GSFIC and the Georgia
Judicial Complex. The team will prepare supplemental
drawings and change orders as necessary. The design
team shall review the contractors requisitions for payment.
Such review shall be provided to indicate for GSFIC and
the Georgia Judicial Complex, which based on the Design
Teams observations, the work has been progressed to the
indicated point.
During the Construction Phase the Design Team will
review, on a monthly basis, the contractors construction
schedule to determine the integrity of critical sequencing
relationships and the cumulative effect on the schedule of
all adjustments and changes to work already incorporated
into the construction contracts. In coordination with
the Georgia Judicial Complex and other consultants,
the Design Team shall review the project to determine
substantial completion and final completion in accordance
with the contract documents.
E. DESIGN PL AN
(CONTINUED)
E5 PLAN FOR APPLYING ENERGY EFFICIENT DESIGN

PRINCIPLES AND ADDITIONAL SERVICES
Our sustainable investigation starts at the beginning

of the design process when implementation has the
lowest impact on cost. We analyze wind, rain, sun and
temperature, slope and drainage, vegetation, along with
building use and operational requirements and use our
proprietary BIM software to quantify and visualize the
possibilities to provide you with the best information.
Our experience on this and many other courthouse across
the county are directly applicable to the Georgia Judicial
Complex. For example, high volume spaces such as
courtrooms and lobbies are typically expensive to heat and
cool. By using displacement ventilation we can deliver air
low in the space we treat only the occupied area and let
heat rise into the higher volume. This is a constant volume
system so there is no on/off of systems which makes it
more comfortable, quieter and requires smaller ductwork
and fan sizes.
Our team has the ability to apply multiple energy efficiency
principles to the design as well as provide additional
services of the new Georgia Judicial Complex where GSFIC
and the Georgia Building Authority would deem applicable.
Life Cycle Costs - To supplement the use of our BIM
software and modeling capabilities, the team also uses
sustainable design analysis software, Ecotect, to perform
a myriad of functions that support our sustainable

design goals and security efforts. By importing the BIM
model into Ecotect, it can be analyzed for whole-building
energy consumption, thermal performance, water usage,
daylighting, and other calculations critical to achieving
LEED certification. These advanced tools allow the team
to also fine tune the design based on a multitude of factors
including life cycle costing and security concerns, such
as sight line confirmation, camera coverage, and the
elimination hiding spaces and blind spots to name a few.
Appropriate Use of Technology - Confronted with the
increasing sophistication of technology, limited budgets,
long building life-cycles, and operation and maintenance
requirements, the selection and integration of the right
technology is essential to supporting your goals and
objectives. Based on the experience gained from virtually
hundreds of facilities, each with specific challenges and
requirements, our ultimate goal is to work with you to
design a balanced system that meets all of your operational
prerequisites and enhances the effectiveness of your
personnel; not replace them.
Accessibility - As a public structure it is imperative that
this project be accessible to all citizens. HOK is familiar
with the State of Georgia and Americans with Disabilities
Act Guidelines. Our team has met these requirements
on every facility we have designed since implementation
of these standards and has helped develop the specific
E. DESIGN PL AN
(CONTINUED)
measures for Justice facilities and assisted in training

architects on proper implementation. This work is available
on the Access Board website and in the NCSC Courthouse
Planning Standards. Disabilities including hearing, sight
and physical impairments. Our challenge is to provide
access in a natural yet visibly transparent manner which
supports the facilitys function without intrusion or
additional cost.
Anti-Terrorism, Security Provisions - HOK utilizes our
knowledge gained from federal courthouses (and other
facilities such as embassies to the Pentagon) to implement
technologies appropriate for your project.
Vehicle stand-off distances to reduce risk from car
bombs with the use of the invisible integration of site
elements.
Raise air intakes to prevent the introduction of chemical
and biological contaminants.
Aim exterior windows away from sensitive areas;
particularly areas where explosions could occur.
Provide structural redundancy to assure the continued
use of the facility after a natural or terrorist event.
Locate utilities in secure areas away from docks and
building entries that could be compromised.
Other additional services GSFIC and the Georgia Building

Authority might consider include:
Full Time On-Site Architect

FF&E - Selection, Spec & Procurement Support
Irrigation - Design & Spec
GA Peach Enhanced Commissioning Agent (incentive 10 points)
A/V Equipment Design & Specifications
Aerial Construction Phase Photography
High Definition/Resolution Renderings
High Definition/Resolution Rendered Animated Fly-thrus
Completed Building Photography
Permitting Fees
Physical Security - Force Protection Design & Spec
Physical Security - Progressive Collapse Protection
Structural
Building Systems Equipment Training
Building Systems Equipment Programming
Site Surveying
Geotechnical Investigation
Materials Testing & Inspection - Construction Phase
Water Flow & Static Pressure Testing
Jurisdictional Waters Delineation
IBC Section 1704 Special testing - Construction Phase
Existing Site or Building Field Dimension Documentation
Zoning Change Assistance
Off-Site Utility Improvements - Design & Engineering
Road/Intersection Improvements - Design & Engineering
Right-of-Way Acquisition Services
APPENDIX
We have included a detailed Microsoft

Projects Schedule in an Appendix and in
addition to the schedule shown in Section E3.
GEORGIAJUDICIALCOMPLEX
ID
TaskName
Duration Start
Finish
NOTICETOPROCEED
0days
Mon8/11/14
Mon8/11/14
ProjectKickoffMeeting
5days
Mon8/11/14
Fri8/15/14
SelectionofConstructionManagementFirm
3mons
Mon8/11/14
Fri10/31/14
SCHEMATICDESIGNPHASE
94days
Mon8/11/14
Thu12/18/14
37days
Mon8/11/14
Tue9/30/14
2016
Jul
Sep
Nov
Jan
Mar
May
Jul
Sep
Nov
Jan
Mar
May
Jul
Sep
Nov
Jan
Mar
May
8/11
2
3
16
17
18
19
20
SchematicDesignto50%SD
21
SchematicDesignProductionto50%
30days
Mon8/11/14
Fri9/19/14
22
CodeReview
2days
Mon8/11/14
Tue8/12/14
23
BIMPlan
2days
Mon8/11/14
Tue8/12/14
24
TeamValueAnalysisMeeting
2days
Tue9/9/14
Wed9/10/14
25
EstablishStructuralSystemforDesign
2days
Thu9/11/14
Fri9/12/14
26
Issue50%SchematicDesignforReview
0days
Fri9/19/14
Fri9/19/14
27
100%SchematicDesignReviewMeeting
0days
Tue9/23/14
Tue9/23/14
28
OwnerReview&Comments
2days
Wed9/24/14
Thu9/25/14
29
PickupOwnerReviewComments
2days
Fri9/26/14
Mon9/29/14
30
SubmitUpdate
0days
Mon9/29/14
Mon9/29/14
31
OwnerConfirmationReview
1day
Tue9/30/14
Tue9/30/14
OwnerApproval100%Program&SchematicDesign
0days
Tue9/30/14
Tue9/30/14
15days
Wed10/1/14
Tue10/21/14
32
33
34
SchematicDesignto75%SD(forCostEstimate#1)
SchematicDesignProductionto50%
23days
Mon11/17/14
Pricing
9days
Mon11/17/14 Thu11/27/14
SchematicDesignCostEstimate#1(from80%SD)
9/23
9/29
9/30
15days Wed10/1/14 Tue10/21/14
36
35
9/19
Thu12/18/14
37
A/EReview&Reconcile
3days
Fri11/28/14
Tue12/2/14
38
SubmitPricingtoOwner
0days
Tue12/2/14
Tue12/2/14
12/2
39
Present&ReviewPricingwithOwner
0days
Thu12/4/14
Thu12/4/14
12/4
40
OwnerReviewandCommnets
3days
Thu12/4/14
Mon12/8/14
41
PickUpOwnerReviewComments
3days
Tue12/9/14
Thu12/11/14
42
OwnerApproval50%SchematicDesignCostEstimate/Pricing0days
Thu12/18/14
Thu12/18/14
43
SchematicDesignto100%SD
30days
Wed10/22/14
Tue12/2/14
46
SchematicReview&Approval
10days
Thu12/4/14
Thu12/18/14
47
100%SchematicDesignReviewMeeting
0days
Thu12/4/14
Thu12/4/14
48
5days
Fri12/5/14
Thu12/11/14
49
PickupOwnerReviewComments
3days
Fri12/12/14
Tue12/16/14
50
SubmitUpdate
0days
Tue12/16/14
Tue12/16/14
51
2days
Wed12/17/14 Thu12/18/14
52
OwnerApproval100%Program&SchematicDesign
0days
Thu12/18/14
Thu12/18/14
135days
Thu1/1/15
Wed7/8/15
56days
Thu1/1/15
Thu3/19/15
12/18
12/4
12/16
12/18
53
54
55
DESIGNDEVELOPMENTPHASE
DesignDevelopmentto50%DD
56
DesignDevelopmentProductionto50%
45days
Thu1/1/15
Wed3/4/15
57
CMMeetingtoDefinePreferredBuildingSystems
0days
Wed1/7/15
Wed1/7/15
58
Issue50%DesignDevelopmentDocumentsforReview
0days
Wed3/4/15
Wed3/4/15
3/4
59
OwnerReviewMeeting
0days
Thu3/5/15
Thu3/5/15
3/5
60
5days
Fri3/6/15
Thu3/12/15
A/EConfirmsPickupofOwnerReviewComments
5days
Fri3/13/15
Thu3/19/15
57days
Fri3/20/15
Mon6/8/15
61
62
DesignDevelopmentto100%DD
63
DesignDevelopmentProductionto100%
50days
Fri3/20/15
Thu5/28/15
64
A/ETeamQA/QC100%DesignDevelopment
2days
Fri5/29/15
Mon6/1/15
65
A/ETeamRev'sperQA/QC100%DesignDevelopment
5days
Tue6/2/15
Mon6/8/15
66
Issue100%DesignDevelopmentDocumentsforReview&Pric 0days
Mon6/8/15
Mon6/8/15
15days
Tue6/9/15
Mon6/29/15
67
DesignDevelopmentCostEstimate#2(from100%DD)
68
Pricing
10days
Tue6/9/15
Mon6/22/15
69
A/EReview&Reconcile
3days
Tue6/23/15
Thu6/25/15
70
0days
Thu6/25/15
Thu6/25/15
71
2days
Fri6/26/15
Mon6/29/15
72
73
OwnerApproval50%SchematicDesignCostEstimate/Pricing0days
DesignDevelopmentReview&Approval
Mon6/29/15
Mon6/29/15
22days
Mon6/8/15
Wed7/8/15
1/7
6/8
6/25
6/29
6/8
74
OwnerReviewMeeting
0days
Mon6/8/15
Mon6/8/15
75
11days
Tue6/9/15
Tue6/23/15
76
PickupOwnerReview&AgreedPricingComments
5days
Wed6/24/15
Tue6/30/15
77
SubmitUpdate
3days
Wed7/1/15
Fri7/3/15
78
3days
Mon7/6/15
Wed7/8/15
79
OwnerApproval100%DesignDevelopment
0days
Wed7/8/15
Wed7/8/15
Task
Milestone
ProjectSummary
ExternalMilestone
InactiveMilestone
ManualTask
ManualSummaryRollup
Startonly
Deadline
Split
Summary
ExternalTasks
InactiveTask
InactiveSummary
Durationonly
ManualSummary
Finishonly
Progress
Project:HINESNorthparkPropo
Date:Wed7/16/14
7/8
Page1
Jul
Sep
Nov
GEORGIAJUDICIALCOMPLEX
ID
TaskName
Duration Start
Finish
2016
Jul
Sep
Nov
Jan
Mar
May
Jul
Sep
Nov
Jan
Mar
May
Jul
Sep
Nov
Jan
Mar
May
Jul
Sep
Nov
80
81
82
CONSTRUCTIONDOCUMENTSPHASE
ConstructionDocumentsto50%CD
167days
Thu7/9/15
Fri2/26/16
53days
Thu7/9/15
Mon9/21/15
83
ConstructionDocumentsProductionto50%
40days
Thu7/9/15
Wed9/2/15
84
A/ETeamQA/QCMeeting50%ConstructionDocuments
2days
Thu9/3/15
Fri9/4/15
85
A/ETeamRev'sperQA/QC50%ConstructionDocuments
5days
Mon9/7/15
Fri9/11/15
86
Issue50%ConstructionDocuments
0days
Fri9/11/15
Fri9/11/15
87
OwnerPageTurnReview&Comments
2days
Mon9/14/15
Tue9/15/15
88
A/ETeamPicksupComments
2days
Wed9/16/15
Thu9/17/15
89
2days
Fri9/18/15
Mon9/21/15
90
OwnerApproval50%ConstructionDocuments
0days
Mon9/21/15
Mon9/21/15
94days
Mon9/14/15
Thu1/21/16
Fri12/18/15
91
ConstructionDocumentsto90%CDforPermitting&GMP
92
70days
Mon9/14/15
93
A/ETeamQA/QC90%ConstructionDocuments
5days
Mon12/21/15 Fri12/25/15
94
Issue90%ConstructionDocuments
0days
Fri12/25/15
95
OwnerPageTurnReview&Comments
5days
Mon12/28/15 Fri1/1/16
96
A/ETeamPicksupComments
9days
Mon1/4/16
Thu1/14/16
97
A/ESubmitsUpdatetoOwner
0days
Thu1/14/16
Thu1/14/16
98
5days
Fri1/15/16
Thu1/21/16
OwnerApproval50%ConstructionDocuments
0days
Thu1/21/16
Thu1/21/16
22days
Fri12/25/15
Tue1/26/16
99
100
CostEstimate#3from90%CD's
Pricing
15days
Mon12/28/15 Fri1/15/16
102
A/EReview&Reconcile
5days
Mon1/18/16
Fri1/22/16
103
0days
Fri1/22/16
Fri1/22/16
104
2days
Mon1/25/16
Tue1/26/16
106
OwnerApprovalConstructionDocumentsCostEstimate/Pric 0days
ConstructionDocumentsto100%CD
9/21
12/25
Fri12/25/15
101
105
9/11
Fri12/25/15
Fri12/25/15
45days
Mon12/28/15
Fri2/26/16
107
30days
Mon12/28/15 Fri2/5/16
108
A/ETeamQA/QC100%ConstructionDocuments
5days
Mon2/8/16
Fri2/12/16
109
A/ETeamRev'sperQA/QC100%ConstructionDocuments
10days
Mon2/15/16
Fri2/26/16
110
Issue100%ConstructionDocumentsforPermit&GMP/Procur0days
Fri2/26/16
Fri2/26/16
40days
Fri2/26/16
Fri4/22/16
1/14
1/21
1/22
12/25
2/26
111
112
PermittingGeneralConstruction,Structure,Shell,Core,MEP,
Interiorsfrom90%CD's
113
PermitSubmittal
0days
Fri2/26/16
Fri2/26/16
114
CityofAtlantaPermitReview
25days
Mon2/29/16
Fri4/1/16
115
StateFireMarshallreview
25days
Mon2/29/16
Fri4/1/16
116
ReceivePermitReviewComments
0days
Fri4/1/16
Fri4/1/16
117
RevisePermitDocuments
5days
Mon4/4/16
Fri4/8/16
118
SubmitRevisedPermitDocuments
0days
Fri4/8/16
Fri4/8/16
119
PermitRevisionsReview
10days
Mon4/11/16
Fri4/22/16
120
ReceivePermitApproval
0days
Fri4/22/16
Fri4/22/16
55days
Mon2/29/16
Fri5/13/16
2/26
4/1
4/8
4/22
121
122
GMP/PROCUREMENT
123
BidPeriod
45days Mon2/29/16 Fri4/29/16
124
PreBidConference
0days
Fri3/11/16
Fri3/11/16
125
PrepareAddendum
7days
Mon4/4/16
Tue4/12/16
126
IssueIssueAddendum
0days
Tue4/12/16
Tue4/12/16
127
BidsDue
0days
Fri4/29/16
Fri4/29/16
128
BidEvaluation
10days Mon5/2/16
Fri5/13/16
129
NoticeofAward
0days
Fri5/13/16
Fri5/13/16
392days
Mon5/16/16
Tue11/14/17
3/11
4/12
4/29
5/13
130
131
CONSTRUCTIONPHASE
132
133
Mobilize
15days
Mon5/16/16
Fri6/3/16
134
ConstructionSite,Structure,Buiulding,MEP,Interiors
375days
Mon6/6/16
Fri11/10/17
135
BuildingSystemsT&B,Bldg&Commissioning&Training
35days
Mon9/18/17
Fri11/3/17
136
CertificateofOccupancyfromAHJInspectors
0days
Mon10/2/17
Mon10/2/17
10/2
137
NoticeofSubstantialCompletionfromContractor
0days
Mon10/2/17
Mon10/2/17
10/2
138
A/ETeamPunchlist
7days
Mon10/2/17
Tue10/10/17
139
PunchListWork
25days
Wed10/11/17
Tue11/14/17
140
FinalConstructionCompletion
0days
Tue11/14/17
Tue11/14/17
Project:HINESNorthparkPropo
Date:Wed7/16/14
11/14
Task
Milestone
ProjectSummary
ExternalMilestone
InactiveMilestone
ManualTask
ManualSummaryRollup
Startonly
Deadline
Split
Summary
ExternalTasks
InactiveTask
InactiveSummary
Durationonly
ManualSummary
Finishonly
Progress
Page2
Michael Katzin, AIA

Principal-in-Charge
HOK
191 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 2250 | Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
michael.katzin@hok.com
+1 678 954 8976
www.hok.com

HOK - State Judicial Complex - Proposal

Transféré par

Informations du document

Titre original

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

HOK - State Judicial Complex - Proposal

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

STATE OF GEORGIA

GEORGIA STATE FINANCING & INVESTMENT COMMISSION

Request for Proposal

July 23, 2014 Dear Mr. Hyde,

Michael Katzin, AIA

WE FOCUS ON PROVIDING INNOVATION AND DESIGN EXCELLENCE

Michael Katzin, AIA

Jeff Goodale, ACA

K EY ENG I NEER I NG & C O NS U LTA N T TE AM

Jordan & Skala Engineers

Eberly & Associates

Faithful and Gould

Data, Acoustics, A/V, Court

Michael Katzin, AIA, Principal in Charge

Dan Wiley, Court Operations & Planning Specialist

operations and facility planning trends and is particularly

Julia Busby, Associate ASID, NCIDQ, LEED AP,

Tim Milam, PE, Electrical Engineer

Matt Breidenthal, SE, PE, LEED AP,

Mr. Delaney is the Senior Civil Engineering Project

Vice President | Principal- in- Charge and Project Manager

Architecture: Georgia, OSHA10

American Institute of Architects

Dawson County Courthouse

Gwinnett County Police

Douglas County Adult Detention and

Habersham County Justice Facility

Douglas County Court and

Forsyth County Courthouse and Jail

Gwinnett County Police

Coffee County Adult Jail, Court &

* experience prior to joining HOK

Fulton County Juvenile Court and

Oconee County Jail

Fulton County Public Safety Training

Charleston County Detention Center

Fulton County Fire Stations*

Fulton County Jail Complex Master

Fulton County Medical Examiners

Fulton County Jail Courts*

Expansion Complex at the U.S.

Fulton County Jail Building Upgrades*

Martin Army Community Hospital

Group Vice President | Senior Courts Architect

4 Washtenaw County District Court

Architecture: Illinois; NCARB;

Travis County Civil & Family

Robert A. Christensen Justice Center

Alfred A. Arraj US Courthouse

TIME COMMITMENT 60%

Collin County Courtroom Prototype

Kane County Trafc Court

Lorain County Justice Center

Buzz Westfall Justice Center

Johnson County Courthouse Master

Union County Courthouse

Buzz Westfall Justice Center

Old Post Ofce Missouri Court of

Thomas F. Eagleton US Federal

Potter Stewart U.S. Courthouse and

American Institute of Architects

Kane County Courthouse

East Multnomah County