Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 1

Are educators meeting

the learning needs of boys

in the classroom?


Discussions surrounding the gender

gap in education have gained
significant attention in recent years.
The term gender gap is a result of
numerous studies conducted that
suggest girls continually lead the way in
academic achievement while boys are lagging behind.
In 2010, the Globe and Mail identified Failing Boys as
one of eight major issues that will become a growing
challenge to Canadians in the coming decade (as cited
in Martino, 2015). Parents, teachers, and casual
observers have puzzled over the many boys who
seem to be lost in another world while sitting in their
classroom desks as if their minds did not come in
from recess when their bodies did. Numerous
explanations exist to explain the reasons for this gap
including boys slower maturing, and a combination of
biological, social, and cognitive differences between
boys and girls (Vercelletto, 2015; Piechura-Couture et
al., 2013). Suggested solutions range from
incorporating an active and interactive curriculum
(Vercelletto, 2015), to setting up single gender
classrooms and schools (Piechura-Couture et al.,
2013). Research such as this suggests that this gap is
not beyond the control of educators, and through
careful instructional design teachers can effectively
reach the learning needs of all their students
regardless of gender.

Mandy Kary

view my e-Portfolio


1 A questionnaire was given to students in Grade 4, 6, and 8. These questions

allowed boys and girls attitudes towards school (in general), Mathematics,
English Language Arts, their relationship with their teachers, and their views on
post-secondary education to be compared.

The purpose of this research project was to explore the extent to which current
educators are meeting the learning needs of boys. The research involved analyzing
academic achievment data and giving questionnaires and interviews to students and
teachers. The results of the research show that on average, the current education
system is not as effective at meeting the learning needs of boys as it is for girls. It also
showed that there is a need to raise awareness of this concern with teachers. The research
conducted raised many new questions and showed other potential connections between attitude and
academic achievement that would be worthy of future study.

In order to effectively answer the driving

question, three areas were explored:


2 Achievement data was collected by looking

at thirty nine student files and recording
available information of PAT scores in
Grades 3, 6, and 9.


On Average, boys report

fewer positive attitudes,
with 3 exceptions:

1 Students attitudes
2 achievement data
3 teachers perspectives
3 The teachers of these classes were asked three

questions based around their personal views on

the learning differences between boys and girls
in the classroom. (Only two teachers responded)



On average, boys score lower in both Math

and Language Arts in Grades 3, 6, & 9.

Learning Differences: Both surveyed teachers have

observed learning differences between boys and girls.
Academic Achievement: One feels girls perform better
academically, and the other said she could not
conclusively say which gender performed better.
Preparedness: One responded that she feels prepared
to meet boys learning needs, while the other said this
is dependent on the class.

The gap closes in

Grade 9 Math
The gap is widest in
Grade 9 LA

grAde 8 Teacher Connection

attitudes toward College
& Attitudes toward School (boys were either equal or higher)

Teach to ALL
Explore new ways to
meet the learning
needs of both boys
and girls.


Both academic achievement and positive attitudes are lower on average

for boys. This calls into question the possibility of a connection
teachers meeting the
between attitude and achievement. It is also interesting to note
learning needs of boys in the
that in all cases, whichever gender felt a stronger connection to
classroom? The averages speak for
the teacher also had more positive attitudes towards school.
themselves. Boys generally report fewer
The importance of positive student-teacher relationships
positive attitudes in all areas except towards
cannot be underestimated, regardless of gender. By Grade
college. They also are performing lower
9, there is a gap wider than ever in Language Arts, but
academically on average. Obviously, housed within
boys and girls averages are equal in Math. This indicates
these statistics are individuals. Not all boys
that the gap looks different depending on the subject area
struggle in school, nor do all girls succeed. What is
and the grade. This difference in performance between
evident from this study is that on average, more
LA and Math may be influenced by attitude as overall, girls
boys do struggle within the confines of our
reported more positive attitudes towards LA.
current system and on average educators
The responses received from the teachers show a good
are not meeting the learning needs of
awareness of the learning differences between boys and girls,
boys as effectively as they are
however, it appears that there is the need to better educate
meeting those of girls.
teachers on the fact that boys academic scores are indeed lower
Explore changing views over time (This study
compared only boys and girls in general, but did
not focus on how each genders perspectives
changed depending on age).

Explore the correlation

between the teachers
gender and students
attitudes toward school.

Explore the
between attitude
and academics.

Take a larger
sample and include
multiple classes of
the same grade.

positive attitudes.
They affect the
way students


So What
Does This
Mean for

than girls and they perceive school less positively.

for future

the importance of a

Look into the correlation

between the students
connection to the teacher
and their achievement.

Daniel, J. (Ed.). (2015). Understanding and raising boys. Retrieved from

http://www.pbs.org/ parents/raisingboys/index.html
Fortin, N. M., Oreopoulos, P., & Phipps, S. (2015). Leaving Boys Behind. Journal Of Human
Resources, 50(3), 549-579.
Froese-Germain, B. (2006). Educating boys: Tempering rhetoric with research. Mcgill
Journal Of Education, 41(2), 145-154.
Gurian, M., & Stevens, K. (2010). 10 essential strategies for teaching boys effectively. ASCD
Express, 6(4)
Hawley, R., & Reichert, M. (2011). Successfully teaching boys: Findings from a new
international study. (cover story). International Educator, 25(3), 1.
Johnson, C., & Gooliaff, S. (2013). Teaching to strengths: engaging young boys in learning.
Reclaiming Children & Youth, 21(4), 27-31.
Martino, W. (2015). Failing boys! Beyond crisis, moral panic and limiting stereotypes.
Retrieved October 23, 2015.
Mead, S. (2006). The truth about boys and girls. Retrieved October 24, 2015, from
Medina, J. (2014). Brain rules: 12 principles for surviving and thriving at work, home, and
school. Seattle, WA: Pear Press.
Piechura-Coouture, K., Heins, E., & Tichenor, M. (2013). The boy factor: Can single gender
classes reduce the over-representation of boys in special education? College
Student Journal, 47(2), 235-243.
Statistics Canada (2004, Oct.). The gap in achievement between boys and girls. Education
Matters: Insights on Education, Learning and Training in Canada, No. 4. Available
on line at: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/81-004-x/200410/7423-eng.htm.
Vantieghem, W., Vermeersch, H., & Houtte, M. (2014). Why 'gender' disappeared from the
gender gap: (re-)introducing gender identity theory to educational gender gap
research. Social Psychology Of Education, 17(3), 357-381
Vercelletto, C. (2015).Why our boys struggle in school. Working Mother, 38(3), 40-44.