1.

Validity-we follow the idea of that if it is illogical, it is incorrect

a. Cause and effect
b. Watch for leap to conclusion
c. An argument must have premises, or it is just an assertion
2. Use an illustration (stock market)

Premise - Socrates uses weak induction to support claim 1-only finds one thing
and calls it done
Premise one - we dont have to use the first premise
Premise two (symbiotic/material relation between mind/body)
Premise three-subject to technology

Two
Premise still has issue on first claim
Nothing is more real than dropping a brick on toe
Soul gets confused on what is real
If doesnt change if it is a form
States that soul changes
Good at something and like something doesnt mean that it is the same

Three
Assertion premise one
Accepted at time
Mind cannot always stop actions (breathing and passing out)
Not every action is dictated by the mind

Forms not made up of anything

Argument two
Not an argument a cosmology, an opinion
Premise one states that theory of recollection contradicts P1
Simmias uses functionalism
Second argument

P1-we agree
P2 We agree
P4-contradicts p2 which challenges the argument
Simmias illustration is proven a bad example not the argument wrong
Socrates uses this premise which in truth does more damage to his own
cosmology
Real focus is on what if the soul is a product of the body
P5 we did not tick that
P6 we agree to an extent
Form doesnt perish when changed
Just moves out of the way