From: (b) (6)

To: (b) (6)

Cc: (b) (6)
Subject: FW: Minimum cat opening size and frequency - RGV
Date: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 4:57:03 PM

(b)
( )
(b)(5),(b)(6)

(b)
(6)

From: (b) (6)

Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 2:58 PM
To: (b) (6)
Subject: RE: Minimum cat opening size and frequency - RGV

I agree with Dr. Schmidt in that .5” x 1” will not make a difference. We stick to the 8.5 x 11’ opening.

(b) (6)
Assistant Chief Patrol Agent
RGV Sector
(b) (6)

From: (b) (6)

Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 11:58 AM
To:( MER
Cc:b(b) (6)
Subject: FW: Minimum cat opening size and frequency - RGV

Gents,
(b) (6) is asking to see how RGV feels about having an 9” X 12” critter hole on the fence design
(assuming that we opt for a Jersey type barrier or other similar design). That is their view. Look at the
emails below and let me know what RGV thinks. Thanks.

From: (b) (6)

Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 12:39 PM
To:(
Subject:
b FW: Minimum cat opening size and frequency - RGV

Get with the sector and see if you guys can live with it, if not we need to push back. Will .5” x 1” make
a difference?
From: (b) (6)

Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 12:17 PM

To: (b) (6) J
Cc: (b) (6)
Subject: FW: Minimum cat opening size and frequency - RGV

(b)
(6)
Not sure if you are aware of all that has gone on about the potential holes needed in the RGV fence to
allow ocelot and jaguarandi to get through and still keep people out.

OBP (b) (6) proposed 8.5" x 11" opening but FWS has now come back with 9 x 12. Can
OBP live with that??

(b)
(6)

From: (b) (6)

Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 12:07 PM
To: (b) (6)
Subject: Minimum cat opening size and frequency - RGV

FWS came back with a request of 9” wide x 12” high, and every other panel. Can we live with that?

(b) (6)
Natural Resources
engineering-environmental Management, Inc.
18897 Eichler Rd
Newell, SD 57760
(b) (6)

CONFIDENTIALITY. The information contained in this transmission is advice intended exclusively for the proper use by the intended addressees
and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you received this information in error, you are requested to inform the sender and/or
addressee immediately and permanently delete and/or destroy the material. Please note that no confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any
mis-transmission.