AN OPEN CHALLENGE TO BLIND FOLLOWERS OF ALI MIRZA

1] ALI MIRZA HAS DELIVERED APPROXIMATELY 140 LECTURE BUT IN NONE OF HIS
LECTURES HE HAS CRITICISED ANY ITHNA ASHRI SCHOLAR FROM JAFAR AL KELINI
TO KHUMINI.
THIS SHOWS THAT HE IS AN ISNA ASHRITE.
2] IN HIS LECTURE RESULTOF BLIND FOLLOWING, HE DID NOT MENSIONED A
SINGLE ISNA ASHRITE AUTHOR BUT ONLY ACCUSED ALL THREE SECTS ASCRIBED TO
AHLUSSUNNAH NAMELY AHLULHADIS,BARAILVIS AND DEOBANDIS [ NAMES ARE
WRITTEN ACCORDING TO ABJAD]
3] IN HIS LECTURE ON FINALITY OF HOLY PROPHET HE HAS SHOWN SOME SYMPATHY
TO MIRZAIS. THIS DOES SHOW THAT HE IS AN AGENT OF SOME ANTI ISLAMIC SECT
SAY MIRZAISM OR ELSE.
4] HE DIVIDES AHLUSSUNNAH IN THREE SECTS BUT HE DOSE NOT DIVIDE ISNA
ASRISM IN ITS SECTS .
THEY ARE 1]USULIAH 2] AKHBAARIAH, 3]ISNA ASHRIAH
SUFIA,4]SHAIKHIAH,5]MAULAIAH6]MUBALLIGHIN[FOLLOWERS OF TALIB AL JAUHARI
ETC AND 6] MUALLIMIN[FOLLOWERS OF HUSAIN NAJFI]7]KHUMINIAH,8]KHUIAH
[FOLLOWERS OF KHUI.
5]HE HAS NEVER STATED THAT BOOKS LIKE USUL AL KAFI AND NAHJ AL BALAGHAH
ARE UNRELIABLE AND UN AUTHENTIC.
6] IT HAS BEEN PROVED THAT SOME PORTIONS OFGOSPEL OF BARNABAS
CONTRADICTS QURAN AND SAHIH HADIS ,YET HE USED IT IN HIS LECTURE ON
DESSENSION OF MASIH AS.
7] HE HAS CRITICISED SUNNI ULMA ON THEIR INTERNAS DISPUTES BUT NEVER
CRITICISED TWELVERS ON THEIR INTERNAL DISPUTES.
THIS PROVES THAT HE IS AN AGENT OF SOME ANTI ISLAMIC SECT.