Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/
info/about/policies/terms.jsp
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content
in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship.
For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Penn State University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Utopian Studies.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded from 147.91.1.45 on Thu, 28 Jan 2016 12:52:26 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
No Place forUtopia:
Postmodern Theory and The WhiteHotel
GREGORY C. VBEIRA
This content downloaded from 147.91.1.45 on Thu, 28 Jan 2016 12:52:26 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
118 UTOPIANSTUDIES
This content downloaded from 147.91.1.45 on Thu, 28 Jan 2016 12:52:26 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
No Place forUtopia
119
This content downloaded from 147.91.1.45 on Thu, 28 Jan 2016 12:52:26 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
120 UTOPIANSTUDIES
This content downloaded from 147.91.1.45 on Thu, 28 Jan 2016 12:52:26 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
No Place forUtopia
121
This content downloaded from 147.91.1.45 on Thu, 28 Jan 2016 12:52:26 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
122 UTOPIANSTUDIES
Ill
D.M. Thomas's The White Hotel, a novel inwhich the central character
is split into culturally produced constructs that are mediated by language,
clearly lends itself to interpretationas a postmodern text (Lee 94). To begin
with, the proposed central figure of the novel, Lisa Erdman, is a composite
character constructed out of various types of discourse. In the prologue and
the firstfive chapters, she is characterized through lettersbetween psycho
analysts, an erotic first person narrative poem, a thirdperson explication of
the poem, a putative psychoanalytic case study of the subject, a more tradi
tional third person narrative, and through the detached observations of an
even more distant narrator in the chapter that ends in Babi Yar. But to say
that the subject is "composed"
through these discourses is not accurate.
Better to say that the subject is decomposed or deconstructed because we
never get at whatever it is that constitutes Lisa Erdman. Rather than adding
This content downloaded from 147.91.1.45 on Thu, 28 Jan 2016 12:52:26 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
No Place forUtopia
123
This content downloaded from 147.91.1.45 on Thu, 28 Jan 2016 12:52:26 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
124 UTOPIANSTUDIES
Since we are not asked to privilege one ending over another, I suggest
that the important question is whether a resolution is possible at all. This is
precisely what Jameson means by the "question of Utopia": can a post
modern novel transmita Utopian impulse? More particularly, we have to ask
whether this collective project?the birth of Israel, albeit mystified?rests
as a Utopian representation arising out of real life experience?Babi
Yar?
or whether Thomas offers the ending as just another discourse among
themany discourses of the novel. Is a Utopian response, faith in theprogress
toward the resolution of conflicts, possible within the postmodern con
straints of the novel?
The postmodern constraints are clear: "Lisa," as a fragmented, textually
created subject, lacks a constitutive center, and therefore, is unable to for
mulate any meaningful response to her surroundings. She might, therefore,
be said to be incapable of a Utopian impulse. Her psychic fragmentation and
inability to respond climaxes in the bayonet rape, a fragmenting of her body,
inBabi Yar. Because this scene physically reenacts Lisa's postmodern men
tal state we might privilege thismoment as central to the novel. In this case
we would have to see the discourse of "The Camp" as a critique of utopia?
as an inadequate response to the violence of Babi Yar. But this interpreta
tion rests on the assumption of Lisa's lack of a center and ifwe do privilege
Babi Yar as a reality of violence, we are asserting that there is a central thing?
is susceptible to violence and that at thatmoment, there
that is "Lisa"?that
is a subject to be violated. If there is such a subject, then that subject can
also be mobilized and partake in collective action. And, indeed, we know
thatLisa ismore than fiction; Thomas's descriptions of Babi Yar are based
on the eyewitness account of Dina Pronicheva. If we do privilege Babi Yar
as partaking of reality, thenwe must also admit the possibility that "The
Camp" can?arising out of reality?be a Utopian response to it.
"The Camp" is not just one discourse among themany discourses of the
novel. It is the conclusion of the novel, and as an ending it asks to be privi
leged. But what we find in "The Camp" is an ending that is susceptible to
various pressures. As a postmodern creature, a creature of fiction, Lisa
inhabits different fictional spaces that are never taken as completely true.
But at the same time, as, in some sense, a historical character, she (and per
haps Thomas as well) is bound to try to resolve the conflicts thatfinally led
to theHolocaust. While Thomas cannot, within the constraints of his own
novel, break faith and offer a tidy resolution, he still cannot write theHolo
caust without writing a response?the misty, mystical, ambiguous, post
modern utopia of The White Hotel.
That Thomas seems unsure of the ending is understandable. In writing
about theHolocaust he iswriting about the dangers of utopianism. Lisa is a
victim of the Utopian drives of Nazi Germany, and it is the experience of
such twentieth century utopias as National Socialism and Soviet and Chi
nese communism, that have made us wary of utopia. We are made particu
larly aware of this fear of Utopian repression in the writings of French
theorists like Baudrillard and Jean-Fran?ois Lyotard. For example, Lyotard
This content downloaded from 147.91.1.45 on Thu, 28 Jan 2016 12:52:26 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
No Place forUtopia
125
This content downloaded from 147.91.1.45 on Thu, 28 Jan 2016 12:52:26 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
126 UTOPIANSTUDIES
REFERENCES
Baudrillard, Jean. America. (1986). trans. Chris Turner. NY: Verso,
Davis, Mike. City of Quartz. NY: Vintage, 1990.
1988.
This content downloaded from 147.91.1.45 on Thu, 28 Jan 2016 12:52:26 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
No Place forUtopia
127
Symbolic Act.
Ithaca: Cornell
_Postmodernism, or, theCultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham: Duke UP, 1991.
in Society 4.2-3 (1981): 143-170.
Kinder, Marsha. "The Spirit of theWhite Hotel." Humanities
1990.
Lee, Alison. Realism and Power: Postmodern British Fiction. NY: Routledge,
Levine, George. Rev. of The White Hotel,
28 May 1981:20-23.
Lyotard, Jean-Fran?ois. The Postmodern
U ofMinnesota
P, 1984.
Moylan,
Tom. Demand
Methuen,
Press,
David.
the Impossible:
by D.M.
Condition:
Science
Thomas.
The New
A Report
Fiction
and
York Review
on Knowledge.
the Utopian
of Books
Minneapolis:
Imagination.
NY:
1986.
Rev.
1981: 16.
Sept.-Oct.
Siegelman, Ellen. "The White Hotel:
by D.M.
Visions
Thomas.
and Revisions
The American
of the Psyche."
Book
Review
Literature
1981.
This content downloaded from 147.91.1.45 on Thu, 28 Jan 2016 12:52:26 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
and