Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
I. INTRODUCTION
While extensive research has been carried out to
develop new types of batteries and converters to convert
appropriately the batteries output, very little work has
been done in modeling the battery itself. The fact that
most power converters are now switched at relatively
very high frequencies (much higher than 50Hz) will
require new model of the batteries to take into account
the operation of the battery under this high switching
mode (dynamic behavior).
The State Of Charge (SOC) evaluation is a fundamental
step, especially in energy flows management problems of
stand alone Photovoltaic (PV) hybrid systems, in fact
Lead-acid batteries are the dominant energy storage in the
PV stand-alone systems. Nevertheless, uneconomical
lifetime of the battery is one typical feature of such
systems. During the last decade, the attention of system
developers has concentrated on analysing the reasons for
this premature battery failure. Sensitivity of the battery
and severe operating conditions of the PV systems
stimulate the battery ageing mechanisms and result in
rapid degradation of its capacity. Therefore the battery
always suffers from short life-cycle under stand alone PV
systems. However, there is some technological
development on the component level that allows to
obtain special solar batteries, which have s relatively
longer life cycle under PV operating conditions. These
technologies are still expensive and rarely available in the
current markets of developing countries. On the other
hand, operation control plays an important role in the
Authorized licensed use limited to: GOVERNMENT COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY. Downloaded on December 31, 2009 at 05:02 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
E0 E e ln( SOC )
R0 R1 ln(J /(J q / CT ))
CT
C0
(1)
where:
q is the so-called extracted charge, i.e., the charge
that has been actually extracted from the battery
starting from a completely full battery (battery is
full when t=0 );
C0 is the nominal capacity;
SOC = 1 q / C0 is the State Of Charge;
CT is the battery capacity at current i;
R0 is a constant parameter;
Ee , R1 J, E are empirical coefficients.
1171
Authorized licensed use limited to: GOVERNMENT COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY. Downloaded on December 31, 2009 at 05:02 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
V. EXPERIMENTAL RESULT
The validity of the proposed SOC evaluation model is
based on and verified by means of a series of
experimental tests In the test setup, battery voltage and
battery current waveforms are taken from Hall-effect
voltage and current transducers by means of the analog
interface. The data are sampled at 5 Hz, and recorded on
a PC, using a data acquisition system. The data
acquisition system used consists of LabView software, a
data acquisition card and a sample-and-hold card
(DAQPad-6015) from National Instruments. The
DAQPad-6015 converts analog inputs to digital data at
0.2 MS/s rate with 16-bit resolution. It has 16 singleended analog inputs . The collected data are processed by
MATLAB software, and the time variations of battery
voltage, battery current and SOC are obtained for
different charge-discharge strategies.
The test are conducted on 4x12 V, 100-Ah rated capacity
HOPPECKE mod. 2OPzS100 open vase, lead-acid
battery. The manufacturers data giving the necessary
constant currents to be supplied to the tested batteries to
discharge them to 1.75 V/cell level for different time
durations.
Four charge tests at 7 A, 10 A, 18 A constant currents,
three discharge tests at 2A, 5A and 7A constant currents
and two tests at cyclical current at 2A and 7A, with 15
and 20 minutes switching time respectively were carried
out.
Fig. 4. The selected recurrent neural networks for lead acid cell
modeling.
A. Charging tests
Charging tests were carried out with constant current
ensured by the power supply system throughout all the
experiment, whose target was the upper voltage limit
given by the manufacturer.
In these conditions, nearly all the current does not tend
to charge the battery, but rather causes a marked
gasification of the electrolithic solution.
1172
Authorized licensed use limited to: GOVERNMENT COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY. Downloaded on December 31, 2009 at 05:02 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
B. Discharge tests
In carrying out discharge tests, a constant current load
was applied until a minimum voltage threshold was
reached, depending both on the applied current and
temperature, with the same law indicated for the charging
process.
During discharge it is important not to go down this
threshold, so as to avoid precipitation phenomena that
might badly damage the battery.
VII. CONCLUSIONS
Fig. 6. Battery voltage versus time at discharge current of 5A
1173
Authorized licensed use limited to: GOVERNMENT COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY. Downloaded on December 31, 2009 at 05:02 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
REFERENCES
[1] R. Giglioli, R. Salutari, G. Zini, M. Conte: Experience on a
Battery State of Charge Observer, Proceedings of 11th
International Electric Vehicle
[2] A. Casacca, M. R. Capobianco, Z. M. Salameh: Lead Acid
Battery Storage Configurations for Improved Available
Capacity, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion,
Vol.11, No. 1, March 1996.
[3] Z. M. Salameh, M. A. Casacca, and W. A. Lynch: A
mathematical model for lead-acid batteries, IEEE Trans.
Energy Convers., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 9398, Mar. 1992.
[4] M. Valvo, F. E. Wicks, D. Robertson, and S. Rudin,:
Development and application of an improved equivalent
circuit model of a lead acid battery, in Proc. Energy
Convers. Eng. Conf., vol. 2, Aug. 1996, pp. 11591163.
[5] M. Ceraolo: New dynamical models of lead-acid batteries,
IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 11841190,
Nov. 2000.
[6] S. Barsali and M. Ceraolo: Dynamical models of lead-acid
batteries: Implementation issues, IEEE Trans. Energy
Convers., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1623, Mar. 2002.
[7] B. Schweighofer, K. M. Raab, and G. Brasseur: Modeling
of high power automotive batteries by the use of an
automated test system, IEEE Trans.Instrum. Meas., vol. 52,
no. 4, pp. 10871091, Aug. 2003.
[8] L. Gao, S. Liu, and R. A. Dougal: Dynamic lithium-ion
battery model for system simulation, IEEE Trans. Compon.
Packag. Technol., vol. 25,no. 3, pp. 495505, Sep. 2002.
[9] M. C. Glass: Battery electrochemical nonlinear/dynamic
SPICE model, in Proc. Energy Convers. Eng. Conf., vol. 1,
1996, pp. 292297.
[10] S. Buller, M. Thele, R. W. D. Doncker, and E. Karden:
Impedance based simulation models of supercapacitors
and Li-ion batteries for power electronic applications, in
Conf. Rec. 2003 Ind. Appl. Conf., vol. 3, pp. 1596-1600.
[11] P. Baudry, M. Neri, M. Gueguen, and G. Lonchampt: Electrothermal modeling of polymer lithium batteries for starting period
and pulse power, J. Power Sources, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 393396,
Apr. 1995.
1174
Authorized licensed use limited to: GOVERNMENT COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY. Downloaded on December 31, 2009 at 05:02 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.