Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Benjamin
Williams - 110085362
There are a number of key factors that Delmolino and Harris (2012)
outline to enable a good fit to be found for a student who has been
diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and a particular
classroom setting, such as the compatibility of a childs characteristics
and family setting and how the values of the family and school align. The
article proposes a four level model for both parents and teachers to take
into consideration when making the decision of where to place a child with
ASD, which I will examine in turn.
Level 1: Values and Philosophy: Keeping in mind that the goal in
educating any child is personal independence and social responsibility,
the individual outcomes and how they are achieved vary greatly for a
child with ASD. It is important that the family and school find some sort of
agreement when it comes to assumptions about the childs potential and
the expectations and priorities when it comes to the focus of the childs
education. The authors identified five values that were consistently shared
by parents, teachers and administrators: ensuring instruction is
individualised, collecting data to monitor progress, using empiricallybased teaching methods, collaboration between members of an
interdisciplinary team and planning for long term goals.
Level 2: Quality Indicators: Treatment strategies are identified as the
main quality indicator that this article focuses on. Some examples of
strategies that have proven to be effective from other research include
the need for at least 25 hours of intervention per week, daily
individualised attention to ensure progress, a focus on spontaneous
communication and a proactive approach when it comes to challenging
behaviours. There is, however, no body of research available that allows
us to match individual children with an intervention to suit them
1 | Page
Benjamin
Williams - 110085362
2 | Page
Benjamin
Williams - 110085362
tailor their teaching and instructional methods to a specific child and the
ways in which they collect data on a child with ASD.
The strength of this paper is that it is very well set out and the use of the
levels model makes it easy to follow and look back upon the different
sections when needed. It is also very thorough and obviously a lot of
research has gone into its writing which allows the reader to gain a
thorough knowledge of the many factors that need to be balanced to
maximise the potential learning in children with ASD.
One weakness I identified in this article is that it mentions a couple of
intervention strategies, specifically Applied Behaviour Analysis and
TEACCH, but they do not give the reader any information as to what these
interventions entail. It would be of great benefit to elaborate on how these
approaches differ and the ways they can be applied to the classroom
environment.
The Department for Education and Child Development (DECD 2014, p. 4)
in their Children and Students with Disability Policy aim to ensure that all
students with a disability are provided access to an appropriate learning
program so that they can meet the requirements set out in the Australian
Curriculum. Children with a disability should have the opportunity to
participate education programs on the same basis as students without a
disability, which may mean that the school needs to make adjustments to
the program to specifically suit the child. In this way, the
recommendations by Delmolino and Harris (2012) fit in with the DECD
policy, as well as the part of the policy referring to educators
responsibility to develop, implement, monitor and review educational
programs of all students and implement any negotiated interventions that
will enable a child with a disability to engage with the program and
participate in a supportive learning environment (DECD 2014, p. 9).
Delmolino and Harris (2012, p. 1199), when talking about a setting or
intervention, tell us that, while quality indicators can help to ensure that
the program has the elements that research has shown are associated
with success, they dont give us any information about how we can apply
3 | Page
Benjamin
Williams - 110085362
4 | Page
Benjamin
Williams - 110085362
Section five and six of the Disability Discrimination Act (1992) details what
constitute direct and indirect disability discrimination. The failure to make
reasonable adjustments that will likely create a disadvantaged effect for
the disabled person, whether it is intentional or not, is considered to be
discrimination. This is why it is vitally important to plan lessons that can
be adjusted as need be, whether it be for a child with ASD or just one who
is having trouble grasping the content.
It could be argued that the recommendations from this article fall under
all seven of the AITSL (2014) professional standards for teachers. It is
important that the teacher knows the students and how they learn and
knows how to teach the content in a number of different ways. The
teacher also needs to plan and implement effective teaching and learning
to include all students, create safe and supportive learning environments
so that all students can learn to the best of their capabilities, assess and
provide feedback, engage in professional learning, particularly in the area
of teaching children with ASD and to engage professionally with other
teachers, the childs parents and other professionals to do what it best for
the child to support their learning and development.
Reference List:
AITSL 2014, Australian Professional Standards for Teachers, Australian
Institute for Teaching and School Leadership, viewed 20th August 2015, <
www.aitsl.edu.au/australian-professional-standards-forteachers/standards/overview/organisation-of-the-standards>
DECD 2014, Children and Students with Disability Policy, Department for
Education and Child Development, viewed 20th August 2015,
<http://www.decd.sa.gov.au/docs/documents/1/StudentswithDisabilitie1.pdf>
5 | Page
Benjamin
Williams - 110085362
6 | Page